| Literature DB >> 30423992 |
Lin Bai1,2, Cuizhen Wang3, Shuying Zang4, Changshan Wu5, Jinming Luo6, Yuexiang Wu7.
Abstract
In arid and semi-arid regions, identifying and monitoring of soil alkalinity and salinity are in urgently need for preventing land degradation and maintaining ecological balances. In this study, physicochemical, statistical, and spectral analysis revealed that potential of hydrogen (pH) and electrical conductivity (EC) characterized the saline-alkali soils and were sensitive to the visible and near infrared (VIS-NIR) wavelengths. On the basis of soil pH, EC, and spectral data, the partial least squares regression (PLSR) models for estimating soil alkalinity and salinity were constructed. The R² values for soil pH and EC models were 0.77 and 0.48, and the root mean square errors (RMSEs) were 0.95 and 17.92 dS/m, respectively. The ratios of performance to inter-quartile distance (RPIQ) for the soil pH and EC models were 3.84 and 0.14, respectively, indicating that the soil pH model performed well but the soil EC model was not considerably reliable. With the validation dataset, the RMSEs of the two models were 1.06 and 18.92 dS/m. With the PLSR models applied to hyperspectral data acquired from the hyperspectral imager (HSI) onboard the HJ-1A satellite (launched in 2008 by China), the soil alkalinity and salinity distributions were mapped in the study area, and were validated with RMSEs of 1.09 and 17.30 dS/m, respectively. These findings revealed that the hyperspectral images in the VIS-NIR wavelengths had the potential to map soil alkalinity and salinity in the Songnen Plain, China.Entities:
Keywords: PLSR model; alkalinity and salinity; hyperspectral data; soil
Year: 2018 PMID: 30423992 PMCID: PMC6264000 DOI: 10.3390/s18113855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Wuyu’er–Shuangyang River Basin and soil sample sites in the study area. The red frame confines the mapping area for soil alkalinity and salinity, corresponding to two HSI scenes. The solid triangles denote soil sampling sites.
Descriptive statistics of soil physical and chemical measurements.
| Mean | Maximum | Minimum | Standard Deviation | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 8.43 | 10.86 | 5.34 | 1.91 | 9.48 |
| EC (dS/m) | 5.22 | 153.00 | 0.05 | 19.64 | 0.78 |
| TOC (%) | 1.82 | 5.71 | 0.25 | 1.40 | 1.44 |
| HCO3− (mg/L) | 1247.95 | 4515.00 | 55.57 | 1408.92 | 788.14 |
| CO32− (mg/L) | 1017.96 | 12,436.00 | 0 | 2406.44 | 224.55 |
Correlation matrix among pH, EC, TOC and two ions.
| pH | EC | TOC | HCO3− | CO32− | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 1 | ||||
| EC | 0.74 | 1 | |||
| TOC | –0.61 | –0.48 | 1 | ||
| HCO3− | 0.19 | 0.25 | –0.07 | 1 | |
| CO32− | 0.87 | 0.85 | –0.58 | 0.16 | 1 |
Descriptive statistics of soil pH-EC levels.
| pH-EC Levels | Characteristics | Geographical Background | pH | EC (dS/m) | TOC (%) | CO32− (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongly alkaline and strongly saline | Sporadic small patches salt crust | Margins of playas and pools | 10.48 | 17.80 | 0.45 | 8366.70 |
| Strongly alkaline and moderately saline | White color | Margins of playas and pools | 10.46 | 9.42 | 0.57 | 2450.54 |
| Strongly alkaline and slightly saline | Grey white color | Margins of playas and pools | 10.29 | 5.64 | 0.53 | 977.08 |
| Strongly alkaline and non-saline | Grey color | Margins of playas and pools | 10.11 | 1.39 | 0.69 | 296.60 |
| Moderately alkaline and non-saline | Brown color | flats near playas and pools | 8.65 | 0.29 | 1.19 | 0 |
| Slightly alkaline and non-saline | Dark color | flats | 7.94 | 0.23 | 2.34 | - |
| Non-affected soils | Dark color | flats | 5.91 | 0.14 | 3.22 | - |
Note: CO32− contents of soil pH below 8.5 are not calculated.
Figure 2Average soil spectra curves from 505 nm to 956 nm in different pH-EC levels.
Performance statistics of PLSR models for estimating soil pH and EC (dS/m).
| Calibration | Validation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bands | R2 | Constant | Components | RMSE | RPIQ | RMSE | |
| pH | Band 21-band 115 | 0.77 | 3.60 | 3 | 0.95 | 3.84 | 1.06 |
| EC | Band 21-band 115 | 0.48 | –38.39 | 3 | 17.92 | 0.14 | 18.92 |
| pH | Band 21, band 76, band 108 | 0.74 | 2.31 | 2 | 1.01 | 4.02 | 1.26 |
| EC | Band 21, band 73, band 109 | 0.36 | –55.51 | 1 | 19.63 | 0.13 | 18.96 |
Figure 3Final regression coefficient curves of PLSR models.
Performance statistics of PLSR model inversion from HSI images.
| Map Inversion | Validation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum | Minimum | RMSE | |
| pH | 14.65 | 1.78 | 1.09 |
| EC (dS/m) | 35.72 | −55.09 | 17.30 |
Figure 4Alkaline and saline classifications of soils in accordance with pH-EC levels.