| Literature DB >> 30423969 |
Ștefania Marin1,2, Mădălina Georgiana Albu Kaya3, Mihaela Violeta Ghica4, Cristina Dinu-Pîrvu5, Lăcrămioara Popa6, Denisa Ioana Udeanu7, Geanina Mihai8, Marius Enachescu9,10.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to design, develop and evaluate new biohybrid sponges based on polymers (collagen and polyvinyl alcohol) with and without indomethacin as anti-inflammatory drug model to be used for tissue regeneration in wound healing. Type I fibrillar collagen in the form of a gel and different concentrations of polyvinyl alcohol were mixed together to prepare composite gels. Both control samples, without indomethacin and with indomethacin, were obtained. All samples were crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. By freeze-drying of hydrogels, the spongious forms (matrices) were obtained. The matrices were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), water absorption, enzymatic degradation and in vitro indomethacin release. The pharmacological effect of the spongious biohybrid matrices was determined on an experimental model of burns induced to Wistar rats. The SEM images showed a porous structure with interconnected pores. Collagen sponges present a structure with pore sizes between 20 and 200 µm, which became more and more compact with polyvinyl alcohol addition. The FT-IR showed interactions between collagen and polyvinyl alcohol. The enzymatic degradation indicated that the most stable matrix is the one with the ratio 75:25 of collagen:polyvinyl alcohol (ACI75), the other ones being degradable in time. The kinetic data of indomethacin release from matrices were fitted with different kinetic models and highlighted a biphasic release of the drug. Such kinetic profiles are targeted in skin wound healing for which important aspects are impaired inflammation and local pain. The treatment with sponges associated with anti-inflammatory drug had beneficial effects on the healing process in experimentally induced burns compared to the corresponding matrices without indomethacin and the classical treated control group.Entities:
Keywords: collagen; indomethacin; wound dressing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30423969 PMCID: PMC6320800 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10040224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Composition of collagen–polyvinyl alcohol matrices doped with indomethacin.
| Sample Code | C | CI | A | AI | AC25 | ACI25 | AC50 | ACI50 | AC75 | ACI75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collagen (COLL), % | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 75 |
| Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), % | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 25 |
| Indomethacin (IND), % | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Glutaraldehyde (GA), % | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 |
Figure 1Lyophilization program used to obtain collagen–polyvinyl alcohol–indomethacin matrices.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of obtained matrices for control samples.
Figure 3SEM images of (a) control samples, without indomethacin and (b) matrices with indomethacin, 250×.
Figure 4Water up-take (a) and enzymatic degradation (b) for all spongious matrices.
Figure 5Time-dependent cumulative release profiles of indomethacin from spongious matrices.
Correlation coefficients for indomethacin release from spongious supports determined by application of Power law, Higuchi and Zero-order models; kinetic parameters specific for Power law model; drug released percentage.
| Matrices | Kinetic Constant | Release | Power Model | Higuchi Model | Zero-Order | Drug |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI | 0.305 | 0.18 | 0.9876 | 0.8675 | 0.7017 | 85.68 * |
| CI | 0.038 | 0.43 | 0.9811 | 0.9766 | 0.8727 | 82.28 ** |
| ACI25 | 0.041 | 0.40 | 0.9883 | 0.9844 | 0.8893 | 93.35 ** |
| ACI50 | 0.053 | 0.42 | 0.9761 | 0.9687 | 0.8538 | 97.34 ** |
| ACI75 | 0.066 | 0.38 | 0.9788 | 0.9640 | 0.8373 | 91.31 ** |
* Drug released percentage after 8 h; ** drug released percentage after 24 h.
Figure 6The variation of wound diameter (mm) in days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14 after inflicting the burns and the treatment with collagen scaffolds. The graph bars represent standard deviation. Dunett’s test (vs. control) * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (C = collagen, I = indomethacin, A = polyvinyl alcohol).
Figure 7The evolution of the healing process for 14 days after inducing the burns and the treatment with spongious matrices (C = collagen, I = indomethacin, A = polyvinyl alcohol).
Figure 8The macroscopic evolution of the wound morphology after different treatment with spongious matrices and control group for 14 days (magnification 1.2×).