| Literature DB >> 30423899 |
Diana Abril-Milán1, Oscar Valdés2, Yaneris Mirabal-Gallardo3, Alexander F de la Torre4, Carlos Bustamante5, Jorge Contreras6.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the potential of two non-edible oil extracts from seeds of Colliguaja integerrima (CIO) and Colliguaja salicifolia (CSO) to use as a renewable source for polyols and, eventually, polyurethane foams or biodiesel. For this purpose, two novel polyols from the aforementioned oils were obtained in a one-single step reaction using a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid. The polyol derivatives obtained from the two studied oils were characterized by spectral (FTIR, ¹H NMR, and 13C NMR), physicochemical (e.g., chromatographic analysis, acid value, oxidizability values, iodine value, peroxide value, saponification number, kinematic viscosity, density, theorical molecular weight, hydroxyl number, and hydroxyl functionality) and thermal (TGA) analyses according to standard methods. Physicochemical results revealed that all parameters, with the exception of the iodine value, were higher for bio-polyols (CSP and CIP) compared to the starting oils. The NMR, TGA, and FTIR analyses demonstrated the formation of polyols. Finally, the OH functionality values for CIP and CSP were 4.50 and 5.00, respectively. This result indicated the possible used of CIP and CSP as a raw material for the preparation of polyurethane rigid foams.Entities:
Keywords: Colliguaja integerrima; Colliguaja salicifolia; bio-polyol; renewable resources; vegetable oil
Year: 2018 PMID: 30423899 PMCID: PMC6266139 DOI: 10.3390/ma11112244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition and characteristics of C. integerrima oil (CIO) and C. salicifolia oil (CSO).
| Parameters | Oils | |
|---|---|---|
| CIO | CSO | |
| Fatty acid (%) | ||
| Myristic, C14:0 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Palmitic, C16:0 | 10.54 | 8.46 |
| Palmitoleic, C16:1 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| Margaric, C17:0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stearic, C18:0 | 2.03 | 2.06 |
| Oleic, C18:1 | 23.50 | 15.08 |
| Linoleic, C18:2 | 31.11 | 20.40 |
| Gamma- linolenic, C18:3 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
| Alpha-linolenic, C18:3 | 26.39 | 46.60 |
| Gondoic, C20:1 | 5.35 | 6.34 |
| Eicosadienoic C20:2 | 0.48 | 0.73 |
| Cox value | 9.35 | 12.24 |
| AV (mg KOH/g oil) | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| IV (g I2/100 g oil) | 143.8 | 179.3 |
| PV (meq O2/kg oil) | 19 | 18 |
| SN (mg KOH/g oil) | 196 | 194 |
| Kinematic Viscosity (mm2/s) | 58.6 | 48.8 |
| Density (g/cm3) | 0.884 | 0.896 |
Figure 1Chemical structures of linoleic (a) and linolenic (b) acids found in C. integerrima oil (CIO) and C. salicifolia oil (CSO).
Chemical composition and characteristics of C. integerrima polyol(CIP) and C. salicifolia polyol (CSP).
| Parameters | Polyols | |
|---|---|---|
| CIP | CSP | |
| AV (mg KOH/g) | 4.50 | 12.95 |
| IV (g I2/100 g) | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| SN (mg KOH/g) | 227 | 235 |
| Kinematic Viscosity (mm2/s) | 3637 | 5746 |
| Density (g/cm3) | 1.012 | 0.921 |
| Molar Mass (g/mol) | 1122.4 | 1166.1 |
| OH numbers (mg KOH/g) | 225.0 | 240.8 |
| OH functionality | 4.50 | 5.00 |
Figure 21H NMR spectra of CIP (a), CSP (c) whit their respective CIO (b) and CSO (d).
Figure 313C NMR spectra of CIP (a); CSP (c) with their respective CIO (b) and CSO (d).
Figure 4FTIR spectra of CIP (a); CSP (c) whit their respective CIO (b) and CSO (d).
Figure 5Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve of CIP (a); CSP (c) with their respective CIO (b) and CSO (d).