Ian Cowell1, Peter O'Sullivan2, Kieran O'Sullivan3, Ross Poyton4, Alison McGregor4, Ged Murtagh4. 1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK. Electronic address: i.cowell13@imperial.ac.uk. 2. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, WA, Australia; Bodylogic physiotherapy, Perth WA, Australia. 3. School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Ireland; Sports Spine Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar. 4. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physiotherapists have been urged to embrace a patient-oriented biopsychosocial (BPS) framework for the management of non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). However, recent evidence suggests that providing broader BPS interventions demonstrates small differences in pain or disability compared to usual care. Little is known about how to integrate a BPS model into physiotherapy practice and the challenges it presents. OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of physiotherapists' in primary care in England adopting a BPS approach to managing NSCLBP patients. METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten physiotherapists working in primary care. A purposive sampling method was employed to seek the broadest perspectives. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview transcripts and capture the emergent themes. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged: (1) physiotherapists recognised the multi-dimensional nature of NSCLBP and the need to manage the condition from a BPS perspective, (2) addressing psychological factors was viewed as challenging due to a lack of training and guidance, (3) engaging patients to self-manage their NSCLBP was seen as a key objective. CONCLUSION: Although employing a BPS approach is recognised by physiotherapists in the management of NSCLBP, this study highlights the problems of implementing evidence based guidelines recommending that psychological factors be addressed but providing limited support for this. It also supports the need to allocate more time to explore these domains in distressed individuals. Engaging patients to self-manage was seen as a key objective, which was not a straightforward process, requiring careful negotiation.
BACKGROUND: Physiotherapists have been urged to embrace a patient-oriented biopsychosocial (BPS) framework for the management of non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). However, recent evidence suggests that providing broader BPS interventions demonstrates small differences in pain or disability compared to usual care. Little is known about how to integrate a BPS model into physiotherapy practice and the challenges it presents. OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of physiotherapists' in primary care in England adopting a BPS approach to managing NSCLBP patients. METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten physiotherapists working in primary care. A purposive sampling method was employed to seek the broadest perspectives. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview transcripts and capture the emergent themes. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged: (1) physiotherapists recognised the multi-dimensional nature of NSCLBP and the need to manage the condition from a BPS perspective, (2) addressing psychological factors was viewed as challenging due to a lack of training and guidance, (3) engaging patients to self-manage their NSCLBP was seen as a key objective. CONCLUSION: Although employing a BPS approach is recognised by physiotherapists in the management of NSCLBP, this study highlights the problems of implementing evidence based guidelines recommending that psychological factors be addressed but providing limited support for this. It also supports the need to allocate more time to explore these domains in distressed individuals. Engaging patients to self-manage was seen as a key objective, which was not a straightforward process, requiring careful negotiation.
Authors: Jagjit Mankelow; Cormac G Ryan; Paul C Taylor; Maire-Brid Casey; Jenni Naisby; Kate Thompson; Joseph G McVeigh; Chris Seenan; Kay Cooper; Paul Hendrick; Donna Brown; William Gibson; Mervyn Travers; Norelee Kennedy; Cliona O'Riordan; Denis Martin Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Roberto Costa Krug; J P Caneiro; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; Ben Darlow; Marcelo Faria Silva; Jefferson Fagundes Loss Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Joanna Leaviss; Sarah Davis; Shijie Ren; Jean Hamilton; Alison Scope; Andrew Booth; Anthea Sutton; Glenys Parry; Marta Buszewicz; Rona Moss-Morris; Peter White Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Sweekriti Sharma; Adrian C Traeger; Ben Reed; Melanie Hamilton; Denise A O'Connor; Tammy C Hoffmann; Carissa Bonner; Rachelle Buchbinder; Chris G Maher Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-23 Impact factor: 2.692