Literature DB >> 30423479

Clinical Implications of t(11;14) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Hiroyuki Takamatsu1, Takeshi Yamashita2, Shingo Kurahashi3, Takayuki Saitoh4, Tadakazu Kondo5, Takeshi Maeda6, Hideyuki Nakazawa7, Makoto Murata8, Tomoko Narita9, Junya Kuroda10, Hisako Hashimoto11, Koji Kawamura12, Toshihiro Miyamoto13, Sumihisa Honda14, Tatsuo Ichinohe15, Yoshiko Atsuta16, Kazutaka Sunami17.   

Abstract

Conventional cytogenetic analyses and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) are helpful for stratifying patients with multiple myeloma (MM) into high-risk [t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or del 17p] and standard-risk [t(11;14)] categories. However, the prognosis of patients with MM treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) stratified according to these categories remains unclear. This retrospective observational study analyzed 97 patients with MM who received a single, planned ASCT after treatment with 200 mg/m2 melphalan between 2001 and 2011. The patients were grouped according to chromosomal abnormality, including t(11;14) (n = 45), t(4;14) (n = 31), del 17p (n = 10), t(11;14) with del 17p (n = 7), and t(4;14) with del 17p (n = 4). Median overall survival (OS) of the t(11;14) group (64.1 months) was not significantly different from that of the t(4;14) group (not reached), but it was significantly longer than that of the del 17p group (23.0 months; P = .002). G-banding revealed that the median OS of the t(11;14) group with additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) (46.2 months) was significantly shorter than that of the t(11;14) group without ACAs (not reached; P = .005) and the t(4;14) group (not reached; P = .010). These findings highlight the importance of G-banding in patients with t(11;14) MM.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous stem cell transplantation; Multiple myeloma; t(11;14)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30423479     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  5 in total

Review 1.  Multiple myeloma with t(11;14): unique biology and evolving landscape.

Authors:  Susan Bal; Shaji K Kumar; Rafael Fonseca; Francesca Gay; Vania Tm Hungria; Ahmet Dogan; Luciano J Costa
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.942

2.  CT-derived relationship between low relative muscle mass and bone damage in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing stem cells transplantation.

Authors:  Alberto Stefano Tagliafico; Federica Rossi; Bianca Bignotti; Lorenzo Torri; Alessandro Bonsignore; Liliana Belgioia; Alida Domineitto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Development and validation of prognostic implications of chromosome abnormalities algorithm for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tiancheng Luo; Wanting Qiang; Jing Lu; Haiyan He; Jin Liu; Lu Li; Hua Jiang; Weijun Fu; Juan Du
Journal:  Blood Sci       Date:  2020-07-29

Review 4.  Exploring the current molecular landscape and management of multiple myeloma patients with the t(11;14) translocation.

Authors:  Michael D Diamantidis; Sofia Papadaki; Evdoxia Hatjiharissi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  What Multiple Myeloma With t(11;14) Should Be Classified Into in Novel Agent Era: Standard or Intermediate Risk?

Authors:  Wen Gao; Juan Du; Junru Liu; Huixing Zhou; Zhiyao Zhang; Yuan Jian; Guangzhong Yang; Guorong Wang; Ying Tian; Yanchen Li; Yin Wu; Weijun Fu; Juan Li; Wenming Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.