Literature DB >> 30423392

Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.

Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Lynne T Braun, Chiadi E Ndumele, Sidney C Smith, Laurence S Sperling, Salim S Virani, Roger S Blumenthal.   

Abstract

Risk assessment is a critical step in the current approach to primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Knowledge of the 10-year risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease identifies patients in higher-risk groups who are likely to have greater net benefit and lower number needed to treat for both statins and antihypertensive therapy. Current U.S. prevention guidelines for blood pressure and cholesterol management recommend use of the pooled cohort equations to start a process of shared decision-making between clinicians and patients in primary prevention. The pooled cohort equations have been widely validated and are broadly useful for the general U.S. clinical population. But, they may systematically underestimate risk in patients from certain racial/ethnic groups, those with lower socioeconomic status or with chronic inflammatory diseases, and overestimate risk in patients with higher socioeconomic status or who have been closely engaged with preventive healthcare services. If uncertainty remains for patients at borderline or intermediate risk, or if the patient is undecided after a patient-clinician discussion with consideration of risk enhancing factors (e.g., family history), additional testing with measurement of coronary artery calcium can be useful to reclassify risk estimates and improve selection of patients for use or avoidance of statin therapy. This special report summarizes the rationale and evidence base for quantitative risk assessment, reviews strengths and limitations of existing risk scores, discusses approaches for refining individual risk estimates for patients, and provides practical advice regarding implementation of risk assessment and decision-making strategies in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2019 American Heart Association, Inc., and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30423392     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  41 in total

1.  Preulcerous Risk Situation in Diabetic Foot Syndrome: Proposal for a Simple Ulcer Prevention Score.

Authors:  Stephan Kress; Helmut Anderten; Anja Borck; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann; Ulrike Holzmüller; Bernd Kulzer; Alexandra Portele; Oliver Schnell; Helga Varlemann; Claudia Zemmrich; Ralf Lobmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-10

2.  Carotid Artery Imaging Is More Strongly Associated With the 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Score Than Coronary Artery Imaging.

Authors:  Ying Li; Guangming Zhu; Victoria Ding; Bin Jiang; Derek Boothroyd; Fatima Rodriguez; Dominik Fleischmann; Manisha Desai; David Saloner; Luca Saba; Jason Hom; Max Wintermark
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  10-Year Risk Equations for Incident Heart Failure in the General Population.

Authors:  Sadiya S Khan; Hongyan Ning; Sanjiv J Shah; Clyde W Yancy; Mercedes Carnethon; Jarett D Berry; Robert J Mentz; Emily O'Brien; Adolfo Correa; Navin Suthahar; Rudolf A de Boer; John T Wilkins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  The Importance of Primary Care in Cardio-Oncology.

Authors:  Daniel A Cehic; Aaron L Sverdlov; Bogda Koczwara; Jon Emery; Doan T M Ngo; Elysia Thornton-Benko
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-10-21

5.  Does the risk of cardiovascular events differ between biopsy-proven NAFLD and MAFLD?

Authors:  Gabriel Tayguara Silveira Guerreiro; Larisse Longo; Mariana Alves Fonseca; Valessa Emanoele Gabriel de Souza; Mário Reis Álvares-da-Silva
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 6.  The Role of Sex-Specific Risk Factors in the Risk Assessment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Primary Prevention in Women.

Authors:  Priya M Freaney; Sadiya S Khan; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Neil J Stone
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  How Clinicians Discuss Medications During Primary Care Encounters Among Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Ariel R Green; Jennifer L Wolff; Diane M Echavarria; Malcolm Chapman; Annie Phung; Devon Smith; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in the Older Athlete.

Authors:  Alec J Moorman; Larry S Dean; Eugene Yang; Jonathan A Drezner
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Geographic and Sociodemographic Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk in Burkina Faso: Findings from a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Kadari Cisse; Sekou Samadoulougou; Mady Ouedraogo; Bruno Bonnechère; Jean-Marie Degryse; Seni Kouanda; Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-07

10.  Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.