| Literature DB >> 30423270 |
Afaf E G Osman1, Jennifer Anderson1, Jane E Churpek1, Trevor N Christ1, Emily Curran1, Lucy A Godley1, Hongtao Liu1, Michael J Thirman1, Toyosi Odenike1, Wendy Stock1, Richard A Larson1.
Abstract
The treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has evolved rapidly in the past two decades after the introduction of highly active drugs, including tretinoin (all- trans-retinoic acid) and arsenic trioxide. It is now possible to treat this disease without the use of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Today's clinical guidelines include multiple regimens, some of which continue to use cytotoxic chemotherapy. This leaves the practicing oncologist with multiple treatment options when faced with a new case of APL. In an effort to standardize our approach to the treatment of newly diagnosed APL, we sought to develop a set of treatment recommendations at our institution. We identified eight major controversial issues in the treatment of APL. These controversial issues include the optimal dose and schedule of both all- trans-retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide, the optimal regimen for high-risk APL, the need for intrathecal prophylaxis, the use of prophylactic corticosteroids, and the need for maintenance therapy after consolidation. We reviewed the relevant literature and used the Delphi method among the coauthors to reach consensus for recommendations on the basis of the best available data and our own clinical experience. In this clinical review, we present our consensus recommendations, the reasoning behind them, and the grading of the evidence that supports them.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30423270 DOI: 10.1200/JOP.18.00328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol Pract ISSN: 1554-7477 Impact factor: 3.840