Wuqiang Zhu1, Sean Reuter1, Loren J Field1. 1. The Krannert Institute of Cardiology and the Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1044 West Walnut Street, R4 Building Room W376, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Doxorubicin (DOX) is a widely used and effective anti-cancer therapeutic. DOX treatment is associated with both acute and late onset cardiotoxicity, limiting its overall efficacy. Here, the impact of cardiomyocyte cell cycle activation was examined in a juvenile model featuring aspects of acute and late onset DOX cardiotoxicity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-week old MHC-cycD2 transgenic mice (which express cyclin D2 in postnatal cardiomyocytes and exhibit sustained cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity; D2 mice) and their wild type (WT) littermates received weekly DOX injections for 5 weeks (25 mg/kg cumulative dose). One week after the last DOX treatment (acute stage), cardiac function was suppressed in both groups. Acute DOX cardiotoxicity in D2 and WT mice was associated with similar increases in the levels of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and Ku70/Ku80 expression (markers of DNA damage and oxidative stress), as well as similar reductions in hypertrophic cardiomyocyte growth. Cardiac dysfunction persisted in WT mice for 13 weeks following the last DOX treatment (late stage) and was accompanied by increased levels of cardiomyocyte apoptosis, Ku expression, and myocardial fibrosis. In contrast, D2 mice exhibited a progressive recovery in cardiac function, which was indistinguishable from saline-treated animals by 9 weeks following the last DOX treatment. Improved cardiac function was accompanied by reductions in the levels of late stage cardiomyocyte apoptosis, Ku expression, and myocardial fibrosis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity can promote recovery of cardiac function and preserve cardiac structure following DOX treatment. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Doxorubicin (DOX) is a widely used and effective anti-cancer therapeutic. DOX treatment is associated with both acute and late onset cardiotoxicity, limiting its overall efficacy. Here, the impact of cardiomyocyte cell cycle activation was examined in a juvenile model featuring aspects of acute and late onset DOXcardiotoxicity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-week old MHC-cycD2 transgenic mice (which express cyclin D2 in postnatal cardiomyocytes and exhibit sustained cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity; D2 mice) and their wild type (WT) littermates received weekly DOX injections for 5 weeks (25 mg/kg cumulative dose). One week after the last DOX treatment (acute stage), cardiac function was suppressed in both groups. Acute DOXcardiotoxicity in D2 and WT mice was associated with similar increases in the levels of cardiomyocyte apoptosis and Ku70/Ku80 expression (markers of DNA damage and oxidative stress), as well as similar reductions in hypertrophic cardiomyocyte growth. Cardiac dysfunction persisted in WT mice for 13 weeks following the last DOX treatment (late stage) and was accompanied by increased levels of cardiomyocyte apoptosis, Ku expression, and myocardial fibrosis. In contrast, D2 mice exhibited a progressive recovery in cardiac function, which was indistinguishable from saline-treated animals by 9 weeks following the last DOX treatment. Improved cardiac function was accompanied by reductions in the levels of late stage cardiomyocyte apoptosis, Ku expression, and myocardial fibrosis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity can promote recovery of cardiac function and preserve cardiac structure following DOX treatment. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Karl Toischer; Wuqiang Zhu; Mark Hünlich; Belal A Mohamed; Sara Khadjeh; Sean P Reuter; Katrin Schäfer; Deepak Ramanujam; Stefan Engelhardt; Loren J Field; Gerd Hasenfuss Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Rutger J Hassink; Kishore B Pasumarthi; Hidehiro Nakajima; Michael Rubart; Mark H Soonpaa; Aart Brutel de la Rivière; Pieter A Doevendans; Loren J Field Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2007-12-12 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Sui Zhang; Xiaobing Liu; Tasneem Bawa-Khalfe; Long-Sheng Lu; Yi Lisa Lyu; Leroy F Liu; Edward T H Yeh Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-10-28 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ibrahim Y Abdelgawad; Marianne K O Grant; Flavia E Popescu; David A Largaespada; Beshay N Zordoky Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Yi Sui; Wei Zhang; Tao Tang; Lili Gao; Ting Cao; Hongbo Zhu; Qinghua You; Bo Yu; Tao Yang Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Petr Kala; Hana Bartušková; Jan Piťha; Zdenka Vaňourková; Soňa Kikerlová; Šárka Jíchová; Vojtěch Melenovský; Lenka Hošková; Josef Veselka; Elzbieta Kompanowska-Jezierska; Janusz Sadowski; Olga Gawrys; Hana Maxová; Luděk Červenka Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 5.923