Shreya Kangovi1,2,3,4, Nandita Mitra5, Lindsey Norton1, Rory Harte1, Xinyi Zhao1, Tamala Carter2, David Grande1,4, Judith A Long1,3,4. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 2. Penn Center for Community Health Workers, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 5. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Abstract
Importance: Addressing the social determinants of health has been difficult for health systems to operationalize. Objective: To assess a standardized intervention, Individualized Management for Patient-Centered Targets (IMPaCT), delivered by community health workers (CHWs) across 3 health systems. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-armed, single-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited patients from 3 primary care facilities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, between January 28, 2015, and March 28, 2016. Patients who resided in a high-poverty zip code, were uninsured or publicly insured, and who had a diagnosis for 2 or more chronic diseases were recruited, and patients were randomized to either the CHW intervention or the control arm (goal setting only). Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach from June 2017 to March 2018. Intervention: Participants set a chronic disease management goal with their primary care physician; those randomized to the CHW intervention received 6 months of tailored support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in self-rated physical health. The secondary outcomes were self-rated mental health, chronic disease control, patient activation, patient-reported quality of primary care, and all-cause hospitalization. Results: Of the 592 participants, 370 (62.5%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 52.6 (11.1) years. Participants in both arms had similar improvements in self-rated physical health (mean [SD], 1.8 [11.2] vs 1.6 [9.9]; P = .89). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to report the highest quality of care (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4; risk difference [RD], 0.12; P < .001) and spent fewer total days in the hospital at 6 months (155 days vs 345 days; absolute event rate reduction, 69%) and 9 months (300 days vs 471 days; absolute event rate reduction, 65%). This reduction was driven by a shorter average length of stay (difference, -3.1 days; 95% CI, -6.33 to 0.22; P = .06) and a lower mean number of hospitalizations (difference, -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to 0.0; P = .07) among patients who were hospitalized. Patients in the intervention group had a lower odds of repeat hospitalizations (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; RD, -0.24; P = .02), including 30-day readmissions (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9; RD, -0.17; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: A standardized intervention did not improve self-rated health but did improve the patient-perceived quality of care while reducing hospitalizations, suggesting that health systems may use a standardized intervention to address the social determinants of health. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02347787.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Addressing the social determinants of health has been difficult for health systems to operationalize. Objective: To assess a standardized intervention, Individualized Management for Patient-Centered Targets (IMPaCT), delivered by community health workers (CHWs) across 3 health systems. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-armed, single-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited patients from 3 primary care facilities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, between January 28, 2015, and March 28, 2016. Patients who resided in a high-poverty zip code, were uninsured or publicly insured, and who had a diagnosis for 2 or more chronic diseases were recruited, and patients were randomized to either the CHW intervention or the control arm (goal setting only). Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach from June 2017 to March 2018. Intervention: Participants set a chronic disease management goal with their primary care physician; those randomized to the CHW intervention received 6 months of tailored support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in self-rated physical health. The secondary outcomes were self-rated mental health, chronic disease control, patient activation, patient-reported quality of primary care, and all-cause hospitalization. Results: Of the 592 participants, 370 (62.5%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 52.6 (11.1) years. Participants in both arms had similar improvements in self-rated physical health (mean [SD], 1.8 [11.2] vs 1.6 [9.9]; P = .89). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to report the highest quality of care (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4; risk difference [RD], 0.12; P < .001) and spent fewer total days in the hospital at 6 months (155 days vs 345 days; absolute event rate reduction, 69%) and 9 months (300 days vs 471 days; absolute event rate reduction, 65%). This reduction was driven by a shorter average length of stay (difference, -3.1 days; 95% CI, -6.33 to 0.22; P = .06) and a lower mean number of hospitalizations (difference, -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to 0.0; P = .07) among patients who were hospitalized. Patients in the intervention group had a lower odds of repeat hospitalizations (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; RD, -0.24; P = .02), including 30-day readmissions (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9; RD, -0.17; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: A standardized intervention did not improve self-rated health but did improve the patient-perceived quality of care while reducing hospitalizations, suggesting that health systems may use a standardized intervention to address the social determinants of health. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02347787.
Authors: Meera Viswanathan; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Brett Nishikawa; Laura C Morgan; Amanda A Honeycutt; Patricia Thieda; Kathleen N Lohr; Daniel E Jonas Journal: Med Care Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Shreya Kangovi; Frances K Barg; Tamala Carter; Judith A Long; Richard Shannon; David Grande Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Sarah Hudson Scholle; Oanh Vuong; Lin Ding; Stephanie Fry; Patricia Gallagher; Julie A Brown; Ron D Hays; Paul D Cleary Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: James K Krieger; Tim K Takaro; Carol Allen; Lin Song; Marcia Weaver; Sanders Chai; Phillip Dickey Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Andrea J Apter; A Russell Localio; Knashawn H Morales; Xiaoyan Han; Luzmercy Perez; Alyssa N Mullen; Marisa Rogers; Heather Klusaritz; John T Howell; Maryori N Canales; Tyra Bryant-Stephens Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Aruna Chandran; Amanda Long; Ashley Price; Jeannie Murray; Errol L Fields; Christina M Schumacher; Adena Greenbaum; Jacky M Jennings Journal: J Community Health Date: 2020-10
Authors: Elena Byhoff; Emilia H De Marchis; Danielle Hessler; Caroline Fichtenberg; Nancy Adler; Alicia J Cohen; Kelly M Doran; Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba; Eric W Fleegler; Nicholas Gavin; Amy G Huebschmann; Stacy Tessler Lindau; Elizabeth L Tung; Maria Raven; Susan Jepson; Wendy Johnson; Ardis L Olson; Megan Sandel; Richard S Sheward; Laura M Gottlieb Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Linda M Isbell; Edwin D Boudreaux; Hannah Chimowitz; Guanyu Liu; Emma Cyr; Ezekiel Kimball Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Radhika Gore; Ariel Brown; Garseng Wong; Scott Sherman; Mark Schwartz; Nadia Islam Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 5.128