Andrea Sallent1, Roberto Seijas2,3, Albert Pérez-Bellmunt2, Eulalia Oliva4, Oriol Casasayas2, Carles Escalona2, Oscar Ares5,6. 1. 1 Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. 2. 2 Arthroscopy GC, Garcia Cugat Foundation Hospital Quirón, Barcelona, Spain. 3. 3 Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. 4. 4 Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. 5. 5 Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain. 6. 6 Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: 3D technology has increased popularity during the past decade due to recent advancements and has been described as a useful tool in several fields of medicine including orthopaedic surgery. Applications include preoperative planning, custom-made implants, patient-specific guides, etc. The aim of this study was to evaluate the similarity between 3D-printed models and cadaveric femoral heads, based on CT scans. METHODS: Cadaveric study of 12 male hips. Computed tomography (CT) was performed and through a semi-automatic segmentation process created the 3D model. Using a 3D printer, the model was printed in ABS plastic. 1 observer performed several measurements in the cadaver, and a 2nd observer performed the same measurements in the 3D-printed model. A 3rd observer compared both measurements and performed the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the measurements of bony structures between the cadaveric specimens and the 3D-printed model (p > 0.05 in all cases). We found significant differences when comparing measurements containing a soft tissue element, for example the dimensions of the cartilage covered femoral head (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed models of the hip are accurate and feasible to the real bone and can thus be reliable for preoperative planning or other uses that may arise in orthopaedic surgery. Presence of cartilage must be considered when creating the 3D model from CT that considers bone but not cartilage.
INTRODUCTION: 3D technology has increased popularity during the past decade due to recent advancements and has been described as a useful tool in several fields of medicine including orthopaedic surgery. Applications include preoperative planning, custom-made implants, patient-specific guides, etc. The aim of this study was to evaluate the similarity between 3D-printed models and cadaveric femoral heads, based on CT scans. METHODS: Cadaveric study of 12 male hips. Computed tomography (CT) was performed and through a semi-automatic segmentation process created the 3D model. Using a 3D printer, the model was printed in ABS plastic. 1 observer performed several measurements in the cadaver, and a 2nd observer performed the same measurements in the 3D-printed model. A 3rd observer compared both measurements and performed the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the measurements of bony structures between the cadaveric specimens and the 3D-printed model (p > 0.05 in all cases). We found significant differences when comparing measurements containing a soft tissue element, for example the dimensions of the cartilage covered femoral head (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed models of the hip are accurate and feasible to the real bone and can thus be reliable for preoperative planning or other uses that may arise in orthopaedic surgery. Presence of cartilage must be considered when creating the 3D model from CT that considers bone but not cartilage.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D printing; 3D technology; feasibility; printed models; proximal femur
Authors: Peter K Sculco; Timothy Wright; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Alexander Gu; Mathias Bostrom; Fares Haddad; Seth Jerabek; Michael Bolognesi; Thomas Fehring; Alejandro Gonzalez DellaValle; William Jiranek; William Walter; Wayne Paprosky; Donald Garbuz; Thomas Sculco Journal: HSS J Date: 2021-09-28