Literature DB >> 30421375

Effect of Stem Cell Treatment on Acute Liver Failure Model Using Scaffold.

Hyeon Tae Kang1, Dae Won Jun2,3, Kiseok Jang4, Jeong-Kyu Hoh5, Jai Sun Lee1, Waqar Khalid Saeed6, Yeon Ji Chae1, Jin Ho Lee7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Injecting MSCs via blood vessel is most commonly used method, which has a major drawback of safety. The aim of our study was to evaluate efficacy using scaffold-loaded MSCs in acute liver failure model.
METHOD: Acute liver failure was induced in mice using thioacetamide (TAA) (200 mg/kg, i.p) once a day for two consecutive days. The animals were divided in four acute liver failure groups: (1) TAA; (2) empty scaffold; (3) MSCs injected through tail vein; (4) MSC + Scaffold, scaffold loaded with MSCs, to evaluate the mortality and changes in liver function. Polylactic-co-glycolic acid scaffold alone and loaded with human MSCs was implanted on mice dorsum.
RESULTS: TAA dose was titrated until one-third mortality rate was achieved. TAA (200 mg/kg) once daily for two consecutive days was injected to establish the acute liver failure model. The mortality of TAA and scaffold groups was 55.9% and 63.2%, respectively. Although, mortality of MSC-TV group decreased 14.7% as compared to TAA group (p = 0.200), MSC + Scaffold group had the lowest mortality (31.4%) (p = 0.013). Cells implanted in PLGA biomaterial were survived until 3 weeks, and their function was increased. Area of hepatic inflammation and necrosis was significantly reduced in MSC-TV and MSC + Scaffold groups; but there was no difference between the two groups. Gene expressions related to inflammation were significantly decreased in MSC-TV and MSC + Scaffold groups compared to TAA group. In MSC + Scaffold group, no migration of stem cells to liver tissue was observed. Although, not all cells in scaffold were stained, some of them were differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells which stained positive for PAS and CYP2E1 antibody.
CONCLUSION: Scaffold loaded with MSCs showed protective effects via paracrine signaling on acute liver failure model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute liver failure; Mesenchymal stem cell; Paracrine effect; Scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30421375     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5363-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  37 in total

1.  Functional differentiation of hepatocyte-like spheroid structures from putative liver progenitor cells in three-dimensional peptide scaffolds.

Authors:  Carlos E Semino; Joshua R Merok; Gracy G Crane; Georgia Panagiotakos; Shuguang Zhang
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.880

Review 2.  Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications.

Authors:  Jeanie L Drury; David J Mooney
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Pivotal role of paracrine effects in stem cell therapies in regenerative medicine: can we translate stem cell-secreted paracrine factors and microvesicles into better therapeutic strategies?

Authors:  M Z Ratajczak; M Kucia; T Jadczyk; N J Greco; W Wojakowski; M Tendera; J Ratajczak
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Stem cell therapy in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Taro Takami; Shuji Terai; Isao Sakaida
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.287

5.  Paracrine action enhances the effects of autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on vascular regeneration in rat model of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yao Liang Tang; Qiang Zhao; Xinyu Qin; Leping Shen; Leilei Cheng; Junbo Ge; M Ian Phillips
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Human umbilical cord matrix stem cells efficiently rescue acute liver failure through paracrine effects rather than hepatic differentiation.

Authors:  Shichang Zhang; Li Chen; Tao Liu; Bo Zhang; Dedong Xiang; Zhengguo Wang; Yingjie Wang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Concise review: Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells: progress toward safe clinical products.

Authors:  Yunjoon Jung; Gerhard Bauer; Jan A Nolta
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Reduction of myocardial infarct size by human mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium.

Authors:  Leo Timmers; Sai Kiang Lim; Fatih Arslan; Jeffrey S Armstrong; Imo E Hoefer; Pieter A Doevendans; Jan J Piek; Reida Menshawe El Oakley; Andre Choo; Chuen Neng Lee; Gerard Pasterkamp; Dominique P V de Kleijn
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 9.  Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy.

Authors:  Massimiliano Gnecchi; Zhiping Zhang; Aiguo Ni; Victor J Dzau
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Nanoparticle-mediated transcriptional modification enhances neuronal differentiation of human neural stem cells following transplantation in rat brain.

Authors:  Xiaowei Li; Stephany Y Tzeng; Xiaoyan Liu; Markus Tammia; Yu-Hao Cheng; Andrew Rolfe; Dong Sun; Ning Zhang; Jordan J Green; Xuejun Wen; Hai-Quan Mao
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and their exosome in acute liver failure (ALF): a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Samin Shokravi; Vitaliy Borisov; Burhan Abdullah Zaman; Firoozeh Niazvand; Raheleh Hazrati; Meysam Mohammadi Khah; Lakshmi Thangavelu; Sima Marzban; Armin Sohrabi; Amir Zamani
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 8.079

2.  Photobiomodulation in 3D tissue engineering.

Authors:  Polina Bikmulina; Nastasia Kosheleva; Anastasia Shpichka; Vladimir Yusupov; Vladimir Gogvadze; Yury Rochev; Peter Timashev
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.758

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.