BACKGROUND: Accelerated (also termed dose-dense, DD) chemotherapy regimens such as accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin have shown better efficacy and tolerability in the metastatic setting, and shortened the time to surgery in the neoadjuvant setting compared to standard-schedule regimens. We hypothesized that a DD schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) would shorten the time to surgery and yield similar pathologic complete response rates (pT0) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) compared with historical controls with standard GC. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant DDGC in MIBC. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cT2-4a, N0-1, M0 MIBC were eligible and received three 14-d cycles of DDGC with pegfilgrastim support followed by radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection. The primary end point was the pT0 rate. Molecular subtypes were assigned and correlated with survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, of whom 58% had baseline clinical stage >T2N0M0; the median age was 69 yr. Ten patients (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-49%) achieved ypT0N0 status at cystectomy. Another four patients (13%, 95% CI 1-25%) were downstaged to non-muscle-invasive (<pT2N0) disease. Most patients (54.8%) experienced only grade 1-2 treatment-related toxicities. However, seven patients (23%) had clinically significant vascular events, leading to early closure of the study. Thirty patients (94%) underwent cystectomy. The median time from the start of chemotherapy to cystectomy was 9.3 wk. There was no correlation between molecular subtypes and survival. CONCLUSIONS: DDGC yielded a similar pT0 rate to that noted retrospectively with standard GC. Vascular events precluded, delayed, or increased the risk of surgery for 23% of patients, resulting in early closure of the study. Additional prospective studies with embedded biomarker correlatives of GC in the neoadjuvant setting are critical to accurately define both the activity and toxicity of this combination in MIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This prospective phase 2 study tested a dose-dense schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin in MIBC. The study was closed early because of a higher than expected rate of vascular events. These data suggest that caution is required in using this regimen, particularly when there is better prospective evidence for the safety and efficacy of alternative regimens such as dose-dense or accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin.
BACKGROUND: Accelerated (also termed dose-dense, DD) chemotherapy regimens such as accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin have shown better efficacy and tolerability in the metastatic setting, and shortened the time to surgery in the neoadjuvant setting compared to standard-schedule regimens. We hypothesized that a DD schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) would shorten the time to surgery and yield similar pathologic complete response rates (pT0) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) compared with historical controls with standard GC. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant DDGC in MIBC. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cT2-4a, N0-1, M0 MIBC were eligible and received three 14-d cycles of DDGC with pegfilgrastim support followed by radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection. The primary end point was the pT0 rate. Molecular subtypes were assigned and correlated with survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, of whom 58% had baseline clinical stage >T2N0M0; the median age was 69 yr. Ten patients (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-49%) achieved ypT0N0 status at cystectomy. Another four patients (13%, 95% CI 1-25%) were downstaged to non-muscle-invasive (<pT2N0) disease. Most patients (54.8%) experienced only grade 1-2 treatment-related toxicities. However, seven patients (23%) had clinically significant vascular events, leading to early closure of the study. Thirty patients (94%) underwent cystectomy. The median time from the start of chemotherapy to cystectomy was 9.3 wk. There was no correlation between molecular subtypes and survival. CONCLUSIONS: DDGC yielded a similar pT0 rate to that noted retrospectively with standard GC. Vascular events precluded, delayed, or increased the risk of surgery for 23% of patients, resulting in early closure of the study. Additional prospective studies with embedded biomarker correlatives of GC in the neoadjuvant setting are critical to accurately define both the activity and toxicity of this combination in MIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This prospective phase 2 study tested a dose-dense schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin in MIBC. The study was closed early because of a higher than expected rate of vascular events. These data suggest that caution is required in using this regimen, particularly when there is better prospective evidence for the safety and efficacy of alternative regimens such as dose-dense or accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin.
Authors: Andrea B Apolo; Joseph W Kim; Bernard H Bochner; Seth M Steinberg; Dean F Bajorin; Wm Kevin Kelly; Piyush K Agarwal; Theresa M Koppie; Matthew G Kaag; David I Quinn; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Srikala S Sridhar Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Daniel Herchenhorn; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Fabio A Peixoto; Franz S de Campos; Valdelice O Santos; Denise M Moreira; Hedilene Cardoso; Isabele A Small; Carlos G Ferreira Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Christopher M Tully; Andrea B Apolo; Emily C Zabor; Ashley M Regazzi; Irina Ostrovnaya; Helena F Furberg; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Dean F Bajorin Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Atreya Dash; Joseph A Pettus; Harry W Herr; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Paul Russo; Mary G Boyle; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Rosalia Viterbo; Edouard J Trabulsi; Eric A Ross; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Costas D Lallas; Yu-Ning Wong; Jianqing Lin; Alexander Kutikov; Efrat Dotan; Timothy A Brennan; Norma Palma; Essel Dulaimi; Reza Mehrazin; Stephen A Boorjian; William Kevin Kelly; Robert G Uzzo; Gary R Hudes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Liu; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Levi A Garraway; Joaquim Bellmunt; Eliezer Van Allen; Jonathan E Rosenberg Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: J L Abbruzzese; R Grunewald; E A Weeks; D Gravel; T Adams; B Nowak; S Mineishi; P Tarassoff; W Satterlee; M N Raber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Di Maria Jiang; Shilpa Gupta; Abhijat Kitchlu; Alejandro Meraz-Munoz; Scott A North; Nimira S Alimohamed; Normand Blais; Srikala S Sridhar Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Giuseppe Rosiello; Angela Pecoraro; Carlotta Palumbo; Sophie Knipper; Stefano Luzzago; Marina Deuker; Zhe Tian; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 4.226