| Literature DB >> 30420894 |
Roselyne Nzangue Tepongning1, Javeres Ntepe Mbah1, Francky Love Avoulou1, Marie Madeleine Jerme1, Evrard-Kevin Kene Ndanga1, Fabrice Boyom Fekam2.
Abstract
Malaria is one of the most important infectious diseases in Africa especially in Cameroon. The nonaccessibility to current treatments for poor people and the appearance of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites stimulate the search for alternative treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimalarial activity and the safety of hydroethanolic extracts from Erigeron floribundus and Azadirachta indica. The crude hydroethanolic extracts of E. floribundus (HEEF) and A. indica (HEAI) were prepared via maceration of the whole plant powder of E. floribundus and the leaves of A. indica in 70% ethanol. The antimalarial activity was determined according to Peter's 4-day suppressive test using the murine model Plasmodium berghei/Balb C mice, while the acute and subacute toxicity tests were assessed according to the OECD 425 and 407 guidelines, respectively. The results indicate a reduction of parasitemia ranging from 49.75 ± 3.64 to 69.28 ± 1.36% for HEAI and from 30.46 ± 4.30 to 62.36 ± 2.32% for HEEI. Overall, HEEF and HEAI at doses of 60, 120, and 240 mg/kg b.w. and 75, 150, and 300 mg/kg b.w., respectively, showed a significant (p≤0.001) parasitemia reduction on P. berghei infecting BALB/c mice. HEEF and HEAI caused a significant (p<0.001) attenuation of body temperature drop in mice compared to negative control, except for the 150 mg/kg b.w. dose in the female group. Moreover, there was no mice mortality observed with these extracts even at 5000 mg/kg, while the aspartate amino transferase (ASAT) level of mice treated with 300 mg/kg b.w. of HEAI extract increased when compared with the control. The results of this study support the traditional use of these plants species extracts against malaria infection in rural zones of Northern Cameroon, therefore confirming their potential as sources for the development of efficient phytomedicines for malaria-poverty disease alleviation.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30420894 PMCID: PMC6215572 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5156710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effects of hydroethanolic extracts of E. floribundus on parasitemia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| M | 60 | 32.85 ± 2.78 | 39.57± 5.12 c |
| 120 | 23.22 ± 2.05 | 57.28± 3.77 b | ||
| 240 | 20.57 ± 1.16 | 62.16± 2.19 b | ||
| F | 60 | 33.08 ± 2.35 | 30.46± 4.30 c | |
| 120 | 23.37 ± 2.15 | 57.32± 3.93 b | ||
| 240 | 20.61 ± 1.27 | 62.36± 2.32 b | ||
|
| M | 10 | 0.23 ± 0.16 | 99.58± 0.29 a |
| F | 10 | 0.29 ± 0.28 | 99.47± 0.55 a | |
|
| M | 200 | 54.36 ± 3.43 | 0.00 |
| F | 200 | 54.76 ± 3.01 | 0.00 |
∗∗∗P < 0.001, statistically significant difference in comparison with control group (distilled water) using student t-test; n=6. HEEF: hydroethanolic extracts of E. floribundus. M: male; F: female.
a, b, and c represent comparison between groups. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test.
Effects of hydroethanolic extracts of A. indica on parasitemia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| M | 75 | 26.95 ± 1.80 | 50.79±3.31 c |
| 150 | 23.97 ± 0.74 | 55.91±1.36 c | ||
| 300 | 16.70 ± 0.74 | 69.28±1.36 b | ||
| F | 75 | 26.95 ± 1.95 | 49.75± 3.64d | |
| 150 | 24.04 ± 0.71 | 55.17± 1.32 c | ||
| 300 | 17.16 ± 0.59 | 68.00± 1.10 b | ||
|
| M | 10 | 0.23 ± 0.16 | 99.58±0.29 a |
| F | 10 | 0.25 ± 0.16 | 99.53± 0.31 a | |
|
| M | 200 | 54.36 ± 3.43 | 0.00 |
| F | 200 | 53.63 ± 2.56 | 0.00 |
∗∗∗P < 0.001, statistically significant difference in comparison with control group (distilled water) using Student t-test; n=6. HEAI: hydroethanolic extracts of A. indica. M: Male; F: female.
a, b, and c represent comparison between groups. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test.
Figure 1Effects of E. floribundus and A. indica hydroethanolic extracts on the temperature of parasitized male mice. D0: day 0; D4: day 4; n = 6; ap < 0.05 compared to negative control at day 4; bp < 0.05 compared to positive control at day 4.
Figure 2Effects of E. floribundus and A. indica hydroethanolic extracts on the temperature of parasitized female mice. D0: day 0; D4: day 4; n = 6; ap < 0.05 compared to negative control at day 4; bp < 0.05 compared to positive control at day 4.
Body weights of mice subjected to acute toxicity assessment of the hydroethanolic extracts of E. floribundus and A. indica.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| 22.0 ± 0.7 | 23.7 ± 0.9 | 24.8 ±0.6 |
|
| 23.3 ± 0.9 | 24.0 ± 0.7 | 24.9 ± 0.5 |
|
| 22.1 ± 0.3 | 23.2 ± 0.7 | 24.1 ±0.2 |
|
| |||
|
| 22.0 ± 0.7 | 23.7 ± 0.9 | 24.8 ± 0.6 |
|
| 22.1 ± 0.7 | 23.3 ± 0.3 | 24.6 ± 0.3 |
|
| 22.0 ± 0.6 | 22.5 ± 1.0 | 24.7 ± 0.8 |
Female mice were administered a single dose of each plant extract at doses of 2000 mg/kg (5) and 5000 mg/kg (3) and mean body weight was recorded before the treatment (day 0) and on days 7 and 14. The control group received 200 µL of distilled water. HEEF; hydroethanolic extracts of E. floribundus; HEAI: hydroethanolic extracts of A. indica.
Body and organ weights of rats subjected to subacute toxicity assessment of the hydroethanolic extracts of E. floribundus and A. indica.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Control | 123.3±9.1 | 127.8±8.8 | 131.8±9.2 | 136.8±8.8 | 143.5±9.5 |
| 60 mg/kg | 123.3 ± 10.3 | 126.3 ± 9.7 | 129.8 ± 9.6 | 131.8 ± 9.9 | 134.7±10.2 |
| 120 mg/kg | 123.3 ± 8.8 | 126.3 ± 9.0 | 129.7 ± 11.5 | 130.3 ± 8.2 | 133.0±7.7 |
| 240 mg/kg | 123.0 ± 13.1 | 126.4 ± 12.5 | 130.4 ± 8.6 | 132.0±10.7 | 134.2±10.6 |
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Control | 5.72 ± 0.66 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 1.28 ± 0.13 | 1.16 ± 0.11 | 0.78 ± 0.19 |
| 60 mg/kg | 5.15 ± 0.58 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 1.26 ± 0.13 | 1.51 ± 0.65 | 0.80 ± 0.14 |
| 120 mg/kg | 4.54 ± 1.46 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 1.21 ± 0.09 | 1.39 ± 0.36 | 0.70 ± 0.15 |
| 240 mg/kg | 5.16 ± 0.32 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 1.17 ± 0.04 | 1.40 ± 0.53 | 0.79 ± 0.19 |
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Control | 123.3 ± 9.11 | 127.8 ± 8.8 | 131.8 ± 9.2 | 136.8 ± 8.8 | 143.5 ± 9.5 |
| 75 mg/kg | 123.2 ± 15.3 | 127.0 ± 15.0 | 130.0 ± 14.5 | 136.6 ± 13.7 | 139.3± 4.6 |
| 150 mg/kg | 123.5 ± 10.2 | 128.0 ± 10.4 | 131.5 ± 9.4 | 136.0 ± 9.3 | 141.0±10.0 |
| 300 mg/kg | 122.7 ± 5.8 | 126.5 ± 5.5 | 130.0 ± 5.8 | 133.7 ± 6.3 | 137.2 ± 6.5 |
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| Control | 5.72 ± 0.66 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 1.28 ± 0.13 | 1.16 ± 0.11 | 0.78 ± 0.19 |
| 75 mg/kg | 5.65 ± 0.58 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 1.25 ± 0.06 | 1.09 ± 0.11 | 0.81 ± 0.13 |
| 150 mg/kg | 5.93 ± 0.75 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 1.33 ± 0.10 | 1.25 ± 0.37 | 0.74 ± 0.11 |
| 300 mg/kg | 5.08 ± 0.37 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 1.22 ± 0.06 | 1.37 ± 0.25 | 0.86 ± 0.44 |
Mice (5) were administered with 60, 120, and 240mg/kg doses of HEEF, with 75, 150, and 300mg/kg doses of HEAI for 28 days, and mean body weight and organ weight were recorded before the treatment (day 0) and on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. The control group received 200 µL of distilled water.
Effects of E. floribundus and A. indica hydroethanolic extracts on biochemical parameters.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| 55.00±6.1a | 153.85±18.5a | 4.83±0.4a |
|
| 54.67±10.8a | 181.45±22.6a | 4.72±0.3a |
|
| 53.33±7.0a | 162.35±11.5a | 4.57±0.2a |
|
| 49.00±11.9a | 175.08±36.6a | 4.88±0.6a |
|
| |||
|
| 55.00±6.1a | 153.85±18.5a | 4.83±0.4a |
|
| 64.67±17.4a | 203.93±42.1a | 4.50±0.7a |
|
| 61.33±17.4a | 191.38±36.3a | 4.30±0.5a |
|
| 58.66±12.7a | 213.58±30.5b | 4.55±0.2a |
a and b represent comparison between groups. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD test. n=6. HEEF: hydroethanolic extracts of E. floribundus; HEAI: hydroethanolic extracts of A. indica.