| Literature DB >> 30420811 |
Guilherme Lemos Shimojo1, Danielle da Silva Dias1, Christiane Malfitano1, Iris Callado Sanches2, Susana Llesuy1,3, Luis Ulloa1,4, Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen5, Kátia De Angelis1,6.
Abstract
The prevalence of hypertension sharply increases in menopausal women. Recent studies have demonstrated that aerobic or resistance training may help control hypertension. In this study, we report that combining aerobic and resistance training may provide an effective therapeutic approach for hypertension control, attenuating inflammation and oxidative stress in ovariectomized rats. Female Wistar and spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR) were distributed into four groups: sedentary control (C), sedentary hypertensive (HR), sedentary hypertensive ovariectomized (HR-O), and combined trained hypertensive ovariectomized (T-HR-O). Combined exercise training was performed on a motor treadmill (aerobic training) and on a ladder adapted to rats (resistance training), in alternate days for 8 weeks. Direct arterial pressure was recorded and oxidative stress and inflammation were evaluated in cardiac and renal tissue. Ovariectomy increases increased mean arterial blood pressure, sympathetic modulation, and oxidative stress in SHR. Combining aerobic and resistance training reduced mean arterial blood pressure (12% vs. HR-O), heart rate (8% vs. HR-O), vascular sympathetic modulation (40% vs. HR-O), and improved baroreflex sensitivity. Combined training reduced cardiac inflammation (TNF and IL-6) and cardiac and renal lipoperoxidation (59% and 57%, respectively vs. HR-O). It also enhanced cardiac (71%) and renal (76%) total antioxidant capacity when compared to HR-O group. In conclusion, combining aerobic and resistance training improves mean arterial blood pressure, cardiovascular autonomic control, preventing cardiac and renal oxidative stress and inflammation in an experimental hypertension model with surgical menopause induced with ovariectomy.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction; combined exercise training; hypertension; inflammation; kidney; ovariectomy; oxidative stress
Year: 2018 PMID: 30420811 PMCID: PMC6215975 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Body weight in the groups C, sedentary control (n = 7); HR, sedentary hypertensive (n = 7); HR-O, sedentary hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7); and T-HR-O, combined trained hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7).
| Measurement | C | HR | HR-O | T-HR-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | ||||
| Weight (g) | 216 ± 5 | 188 ± 2† | 191 ± 2† | 191 ± 2† |
| Final | ||||
| Weight (g) | 280 ± 5 | 197 ± 2† | 264 ± 2†∗ | 255 ± 2∗#† |
| Gain | ||||
| Weight (g) | 64 ± 2 | 9 ± 1† | 73 ± 2† | 64 ± 3∗# |
| % gain | 29% | 5% | 38% | 33% |
Hemodynamic and cardiac autonomic control in C, sedentary control (n = 7); HR, sedentary hypertensive (n = 7); HR-O, sedentary hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7); and T-HR-O, combined trained hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7).
| Measurement | C | HR | HR-O | T-HR-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHg) | 113 ± 1.5 | 165 ± 3† | 176 ± 4†∗ | 155 ± 3†#∗ |
| DAP (mmHg) | 95 ± 2 | 145 ± 3† | 154 ± 3.4†∗ | 133 ± 3†#∗ |
| SAP (mmHg) | 128 ± 2 | 192 ± 4† | 200 ± 5† | 177 ± 4†#∗ |
| HR (bpm) | 366 ± 11 | 359 ± 7 | 355 ± 6 | 330 ± 6†#∗ |
FIGURE 1(A) Pulse interval variability (VAR-PI). (B) Root mean square of successive differences in the pulse interval (RMMSD). (C) Percentage of LF (low-frequency band, 0.20–0.75 Hz) and HF (high-frequency band, 0.75–3 Hz) band. (D) LF/HF ratio. (E) Total variance of systolic arterial pressure (VAR-SAP). (F) Low-frequency band of SAP (LF-SAP). (G) Baroreflex evaluated by bradycardic and (H) tachycardic responses. (C) sedentary control (n = 7); HR: sedentary hypertensive (n = 7); HR-O: sedentary hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7); and T-HR-O: combined trained hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7). †P < 0.05 vs. C; ∗P < 0.05 vs. HR; #P < 0.05 vs. HR-O.
Inflammatory response in cardiac tissue in C, sedentary control (n = 7); HR, sedentary hypertensive (n = 7); HR-O, sedentary hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7); and T-HR-O, combined trained hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7).
| Measurement | C | HR | HR-O | T-HR-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac | ||||
| TNF (pg/mg protein) | 36.05 ± 5.1 | 61.71 ± 7.2† | 60.72 ± 8.4† | 49.5 ± 4.0 |
| IL6 (pg/mg protein) | 200 ± 21.15 | 156 ± 26.03 | 155 ± 20.68 | 115 ± 6.47† |
| IL10 (pg/mg protein) | 59.05 ± 7.05 | 54.19 ± 10.23 | 33.16 ± 5.98† | 29.45 ± 4.35† |
| Renal | ||||
| TNF (pg/mg protein) | 81.24 ± 8.87 | 88.93 ± 4.75 | 96.34 ± 3.70 | 91.33 ± 7.23 |
| IL6 (pg/mg protein) | 139 ± 19.20 | 144 ± 16.79 | 121 ± 15.19 | 126 ± 12.36 |
| IL10 (pg/mg protein) | 45.71 ± 3.03 | 54.33 ± 3.49 | 43.44 ± 3.81 | 60.08 ± 4.35# |
FIGURE 2Cardiac oxidative stress assessed by (A) lipoperoxidation (TBARS), (B) carbonyls, (C) total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter (TRAP), (D) superoxide dismutase (SOD), and (E) catalase. C: sedentary control (n = 7); HR: sedentary hypertensive (n = 7); HR-O: sedentary hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7); and T-HR-O: combined trained hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7). †P < 0.05 vs. C; ∗P < 0.05 vs. HR; #P < 0.05 vs. HR-O.
FIGURE 3Kidney oxidative stress assessed by (A) NADPH oxidase, (B) lipoperoxidation (TBARS), (C) carbonyls, (D) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (E) catalase, and (F) total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter (TRAP). C: sedentary control (n = 7); HR: sedentary hypertensive (n = 7); HR-O: sedentary hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7); and T-HR-O: combined trained hypertensive ovariectomized (n = 7). †P < 0.05 vs. C; ∗P < 0.05 vs. HR; #P < 0.05 vs. HR-O.