Literature DB >> 30420809

Muscle Thickness and Curvature Influence Atrial Conduction Velocities.

Simone Rossi1, Stephen Gaeta2, Boyce E Griffith1,3,4, Craig S Henriquez5.   

Abstract

Electroanatomical mapping is currently used to provide clinicians with information about the electrophysiological state of the heart and to guide interventions like ablation. These maps can be used to identify ectopic triggers of an arrhythmia such as atrial fibrillation (AF) or changes in the conduction velocity (CV) that have been associated with poor cell to cell coupling or fibrosis. Unfortunately, many factors are known to affect CV, including membrane excitability, pacing rate, wavefront curvature, and bath loading, making interpretation challenging. In this work, we show how endocardial conduction velocities are also affected by the geometrical factors of muscle thickness and wall curvature. Using an idealized three-dimensional strand, we show that transverse conductivities and boundary conditions can slow down or speed up signal propagation, depending on the curvature of the muscle tissue. In fact, a planar wavefront that is parallel to a straight line normal to the mid-surface does not remain normal to the mid-surface in a curved domain. We further demonstrate that the conclusions drawn from the idealized test case can be used to explain spatial changes in conduction velocities in a patient-specific reconstruction of the left atrial posterior wall. The simulations suggest that the widespread assumption of treating atrial muscle as a two-dimensional manifold for electrophysiological simulations will not accurately represent the endocardial conduction velocities in regions of the heart thicker than 0.5 mm with significant wall curvature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; bath-loading conditions; bidomain model; cardiac electrophysiology; conduction velocity; electroanatomical mapping; left atrial posterior wall

Year:  2018        PMID: 30420809      PMCID: PMC6215968          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


  45 in total

1.  Time course and mechanisms of endo-epicardial electrical dissociation during atrial fibrillation in the goat.

Authors:  Jens Eckstein; Bart Maesen; Dominik Linz; Stef Zeemering; Arne van Hunnik; Sander Verheule; Maurits Allessie; Ulrich Schotten
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Drift of scroll waves in thin layers caused by thickness features: asymptotic theory and numerical simulations.

Authors:  I V Biktasheva; H Dierckx; V N Biktashev
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Defibrillation depends on conductivity fluctuations and the degree of disorganization in reentry patterns.

Authors:  Gernot Plank; L Joshua Leon; Shane Kimber; Edward J Vigmond
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-02

Review 4.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Nonuniform muscle fiber orientation causes spiral wave drift in a finite element model of cardiac action potential propagation.

Authors:  J M Rogers; A D McCulloch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-06

6.  Three-dimensional atrial wall thickness maps to inform catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Martin Bishop; Ronak Rajani; Gernot Plank; Nicholas Gaddum; Gerry Carr-White; Matt Wright; Mark O'Neill; Steven Niederer
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Atrial Conduction Velocity Correlates with Frequency Content of Bipolar Signal.

Authors:  Stefano Grossi; Francesco Grassi; Lorenzo Galleani; Francesca Bianchi; Andrea Sibona Masi; Maria Rosa Conte
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Characterization of left atrial activation in the intact human heart.

Authors:  Vias Markides; Richard J Schilling; Siew Yen Ho; Anthony W C Chow; D Wyn Davies; Nicholas S Peters
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Basic mechanisms of cardiac impulse propagation and associated arrhythmias.

Authors:  André G Kléber; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  A mathematical model for electrical stimulation of a monolayer of cardiac cells.

Authors:  Ranjini Srinivasan; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  3 in total

1.  The impact of wall thickness and curvature on wall stress in patient-specific electromechanical models of the left atrium.

Authors:  Christoph M Augustin; Thomas E Fastl; Aurel Neic; Chiara Bellini; John Whitaker; Ronak Rajani; Mark D O'Neill; Martin J Bishop; Gernot Plank; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-12-04

2.  Does left atrial epicardial conduction time reflect atrial fibrosis and the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after thoracoscopic ablation? Post hoc analysis of the AFACT trial.

Authors:  R Wesselink; J Neefs; N W E van den Berg; E R Meulendijks; M M Terpstra; M Kawasaki; F A Nariswari; F R Piersma; W J P van Boven; A H G Driessen; J R de Groot
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Identification of local atrial conduction heterogeneities using high-density conduction velocity estimation.

Authors:  Mathijs S van Schie; Annejet Heida; Yannick J H J Taverne; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.