| Literature DB >> 30419954 |
Heng Yang1, Rongsheng Mi1, Long Cheng1, Yan Huang1, Rui An2, Yehua Zhang1, Haiyan Jia1, Xiaoli Zhang1, Xu Wang1, Xiangan Han1, Zhaoguo Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterocytozoon bieneusi is a common species of microsporidia that not only influences human health but also threatens animal productive performance and value. However, there have been no systematic studies of the prevalence of E. bieneusi in sheep in China.Entities:
Keywords: China; Enterocytozoon bieneusi; Genotyping; Prevalence; Sheep
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30419954 PMCID: PMC6233543 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3178-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Prevalence of E. bieneusi and distribution of ITS genotypes in sheep based on published reports
| Year | Country | Province (China) | Prevalence (%) | Genotype (no. of samples) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Sweden | 45.0 (49/109) | BEB6 (32), OEB1 (6), OEB2 (2), BEB6 + OEB1 (4), BEB6 + OEB2 (4), NDb (1) | [ | |
| 2016 | Brazil | 19.2 (24/125) | BEB6 (11), BEB7 (8), I (2), BEB18 (1), BEB19 (1), LW1(1) | [ | |
| 2014 | China | Heilongjiang | 4.4 (2/45) | BEB6 (2) | [ |
| 2015 | China | Heilongjiang | 13.9 (68/489) | BEB6 (28), CM7 (3), CS-4 (4), BEB6/CM7a (5), BEB6/OEB1a (5), BEB6/NESH4a (3), OEB1(3), BEB6/NESH6a (1), CS-4/EbpCa (1), NESH1(1), NESH2 (1), NESH3 (1), NESH5 (1), | [ |
| 2015 | China | Heilongjiang | 22.5 (31/138) | BEB6 (12), Peru6 (5), D (4), O (3), COS-I to COS-VII (one each), | [ |
| 2015 | China | Inner Mongolia | 69.3 (260/375) | BEB6 (237), CM7 (23) | [ |
| 2016 | China | Henan | 51.9 (161/310) | BEB6 (53), COS-I (12), CM4 (1), CHG3 (5), CHS3 (2), CHS4 (1), CHS5 (1), CHS6 (1), CHS10 (1), CHS12 (1) | [ |
| Liaoning | 9.4 (6/64) | BEB6 (3) | |||
| Heilongjiang | 25.0 (10/40) | BEB6 (4), COS-I (2), CHS7 (1), CHS8 (1), CHS9 (1), CHS11 (1) | |||
| 2018 | China | Qinghai | 23.4 (73/312) | BEB6 (31), COS-I (25), NESH5 (11), CHS17 (2), CHS13 (1), CHS14 (1), CHS15 (1), CHS16 (1) | [ |
Fig. 1Geographical map of sampling provinces included in this study. The map was generated using Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2016 software
Prevalence and genotype distribution of E. bieneusi in sheep from different regions of China
| Region | No. of specimens | No. positive (%) | 95% CI | Genotype (no. of samples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central China | 35 | 0d | 0–10.0 | |
| Eastern China | 326 | 58 (17.8)c | 13.8–22.4 | BEB6 (38), CHG1 (14), CHG3 (5), COS-I (1) |
| Northern China | 166 | 3 (1.8)d | 0.4–5.2 | BEB6 (3) |
| Northeast China | 130 | 50 (38.5)a | 30.1–47.4 | BEB6 (40), CHS7 (3), |
| Northwest China | 296 | 83 (28.0)b | 23.0–33.5 | BEB6 (48), CHS8 (32), |
| Total | 953 | 194 (20.4) | 17.8–23.1 | BEB6 (129), CHS8 (32), CHG1 (14), CHG3 (5), CHS7 (3), COS-I (3), |
Note: Different superscript letters within columns represent significant differences between groups (P < 0.05). Novel genotypes identified in this study are indicated in bold
Prevalence and genotype distribution of E. bieneusi in sheep from different provinces of China
| Region | Province | No. of specimens | No. positive (%) | 95% CI | Genotype (no. of samples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central China | Henan | 35 | 0e | 0–10.0 | |
| Eastern China | Anhui | 52 | 6 (11.5)c | 4.4–23.4 | CHG1 (3), CHG3 (3) |
| Shandong | 122 | 16 (13.1)c | 7.7–20.4 | BEB6 (3), CHG1 (11), CHG3 (2) | |
| Shanghai | 152 | 36 (23.7)b | 17.2–31.3 | BEB6 (35), COS-I (1) | |
| Northern China | Beijing | 64 | 0e | 0–5.6 | |
| Inner Mongolia | 102 | 3 (2.9)de | 0.6–8.4 | BEB6 (3) | |
| Northeast China | Heilongjiang | 60 | 31 (51. 7)a | 38.4–64.8 | BEB6 (21), CHS7 (3), CHHLJS1 (3), COS-I (2), CHHLJS2 (2) |
| Jilin | 70 | 19 (27.1)b | 17.2–39.1 | BEB6 (19) | |
| Northwest China | Ningxia | 121 | 57 (47.1)a | 38.0–56.4 | BEB6 (24), CHS8 (32), CHNXS1 (1) |
| Qinghai | 76 | 7(9.2)cd | 3.8–18.1 | BEB6 (6), NESH5 (1) | |
| Xinjiang | 99 | 19 (19.2)bc | 12.0–28.3 | BEB6 (18), CHXJS1 (1) | |
| Total | 953 | 194 (20.4) | 17.8–23.1 |
Note: Different superscript letters within columns represent significant differences between groups (P < 0.05)
Prevalence and ITS genotype distribution of E. bieneusi in different age groups of sheep
| Age | No. of specimens | No. positive (%) | 95% CI | Genotype (no. of samples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-weaned lambs | 292 | 73 (25.0)a | 20.1–30.4 | BEB6 (54), CHS8 (12), CHG3 (2), COS-I (1), CHG1 (1), CHHLJS2 (1), CHNXS1 (1), CHXJS1 (1) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 325 | 72 (22.2)a | 17.8–27.1 | BEB6 (47), CHS8 (11), CHS7 (2), COS-I (2), CHG1 (2), CHG3 (2), CHHLJS1 (2), CHSDS2 (2), NESH5 (1), CHHLJS2 (1) |
| Adult sheep | 336 | 49 (14.6)b | 11.0–18.8 | BEB6 (28), CHS8 (9), CHG1 (9), CHS7 (1), CHG3 (1), CHHLJS1 (1) |
| Total | 953 | 194 (20.4) | 17.8–23.1 |
Note: Different superscript letters within columns represent significant differences between groups (P < 0.05)
Prevalence and ITS genotype distribution of E. bieneusi in different age groups from different provinces
| Province | Age | No. of specimens | No. positive (%) | 95% CI | Genotype (no. of samples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anhui | Pre-weaned lambs | 16 | 2 (12.5) | 1.6–38.4 | CHG3 (2) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 22 | 3 (13.6) | 2.9–34.9 | CHG1 (2), CHG3 (1) | |
| Adult sheep | 14 | 1 (7.1) | 0.2–33.9 | CHG1 (1) | |
| Beijing | Pre-weaned lambs | 20 | 0 | 0–16.8 | |
| Post-weaned lambs | 22 | 0 | 0–15.4 | ||
| Adult sheep | 22 | 0 | 0–15.4 | ||
| Heilongjiang | Pre-weaned lambs | 20 | 12 (60.0) | 36.1–80.9 | BEB6 (11), CHHLJS2 (1) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 20 | 16 (80.0) | 56.3–94.3 | BEB6 (9), CHS7 (2), COS-I (2), CHHLJS1 (2), CHHLJS2 (1) | |
| Adult sheep | 20 | 3 (15.0) | 3.2–37.9 | BEB6 (1), CHS7 (1), CHHLJS1 (1) | |
| Henan | Adult sheep | 35 | 0 | 0–10.0 | |
| Inner Mongolia | Pre-weaned lambs | 37 | 3 (8.1) | 1.7–21.9 | BEB6 (3) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 35 | 0 | 0–10.0 | ||
| Adult sheep | 30 | 0 | 0–11.6 | ||
| Jilin | Pre-weaned lambs | 24 | 10 (41.7) | 22.1–63.4 | BEB6 (10) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 25 | 6 (24.0) | 9.4–45.1 | BEB6 (6) | |
| Adult sheep | 21 | 3 (14.3) | 3.1–36.3 | BEB6 (3) | |
| Ningxia | Pre-weaned lambs | 40 | 23 (57.5) | 40.9–73.0 | CHS8 (12), BEB6 (10), CHNXS1 (1) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 40 | 17 (42.5) | 27.0–59.1 | CHS8 (11), BEB6 (6) | |
| Adult sheep | 41 | 17 (41.5) | 26.3–57.9 | CHS8 (9), BEB6 (8) | |
| Qinghai | Pre-weaned lambs | 24 | 3 (12.5) | 2.7–32.4 | BEB6 (3) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 32 | 3 (9.4) | 2.0–25.0 | BEB6 (2), NESH5 (1) | |
| Adult sheep | 20 | 1 (5.0) | 0.1–24.9 | BEB6 (1) | |
| Shandong | Pre-weaned lambs | 57 | 1 (1.8) | 0–9.4 | CHG1 (1) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 29 | 5 (17.2) | 5.9–35.8 | BEB6 (2), CHG1 (2), CHG3 (1) | |
| Adult sheep | 36 | 10 (27.8) | 14.2–45.2 | CHG1 (8), BEB6 (1), CHG3 (1) | |
| Shanghai | Pre-weaned lambs | 20 | 6 (30.0) | 11.9–54.3 | BEB6 (5), COS-I (1) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 64 | 17 (26.6) | 16.3–39.1 | BEB6 (17) | |
| Adult sheep | 68 | 13 (19.1) | 10.6–30.5 | BEB6 (13) | |
| Xinjiang | Pre-weaned lambs | 34 | 13 (38.2) | 22.2–56.4 | BEB6 (12), CHXJS1 (1) |
| Post-weaned lambs | 36 | 5 (13.9) | 4.7–29.5 | BEB6 (5) | |
| Adult sheep | 29 | 1 (3.5) | 0.1–17.8 | BEB6 (1) |
Fig. 2Phylogenetic analysis of E. bieneusi based on ITS gene sequences. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining method and evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 7.0. Bootstrap values > 50% are shown. Filled squares indicate the novel genotypes obtained in the present study