Yu-Qing Zhang1, Jia-Wei Wang2, Yun-Peng Wang1, Xiao-Hua Zhang1, Ji-Ping Li3. 1. Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: yhljp89@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myoclonic dystonia syndrome (MDS) is a rare inherited movement disorder characterized by the coexistence of myoclonic jerks and dystonia. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment for patients with MDS that targets the globus pallidus internus or ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus. However, there are few studies regarding the long-term effects of Vim DBS in patients with MDS and even fewer in those without gene mutations. METHODS: Two positive and three negative SGCE mutation patients presenting with predominant myoclonus underwent Vim DBS. The Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) were assessed pre- and postoperation. RESULTS: Over an average follow-up period of 50 months, the myoclonus improvement rate was 92.7%. The average improvement in the BFMDRS motor score was 71.4% and the average improvement in the BFMDRS disabling score was 75.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Vim DBS can be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with MDS. Vim DBS alone may be preferable for patients with myoclonus-dominated MDS regardless of the identification of an SGCE mutation. Additional globus pallidus internus DBS may be used for progressive dystonia after Vim DBS.
BACKGROUND:Myoclonic dystonia syndrome (MDS) is a rare inherited movement disorder characterized by the coexistence of myoclonic jerks and dystonia. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment for patients with MDS that targets the globus pallidus internus or ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus. However, there are few studies regarding the long-term effects of Vim DBS in patients with MDS and even fewer in those without gene mutations. METHODS: Two positive and three negative SGCE mutation patients presenting with predominant myoclonus underwent Vim DBS. The Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) were assessed pre- and postoperation. RESULTS: Over an average follow-up period of 50 months, the myoclonus improvement rate was 92.7%. The average improvement in the BFMDRS motor score was 71.4% and the average improvement in the BFMDRS disabling score was 75.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Vim DBS can be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with MDS. Vim DBS alone may be preferable for patients with myoclonus-dominated MDS regardless of the identification of an SGCE mutation. Additional globus pallidus internus DBS may be used for progressive dystonia after Vim DBS.