Literature DB >> 30419178

Primary Stability of an Acromioclavicular Joint Repair Is Affected by the Type of Additional Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Capsule.

Felix Dyrna1,2, Florian B Imhoff1,2, B Haller2,3, Sepp Braun2, Elifho Obopilwe1, John M Apostolakos1, Daichi Morikawa2,4, Andreas B Imhoff1, Augustus D Mazzocca2, Knut Beitzel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The synergistic effect of the acromioclavicular (AC) capsule and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments on AC joint stability has gained recent recognition for its importance. Biomechanical and clinical studies have shown the benefit of combined reconstruction with multiple variations of surgical techniques for AC capsule augmentation. The ideal configuration remains unknown for such capsular repair aimed at achieving optimal stability with anatomic reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Primary AC joint stability can be restored by AC capsule augmentation, while position of the additional suture construct is critical. It was hypothesized that techniques that reconstruct the anterior capsular structures would restore native stability against rotations and translations. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Thirty fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were used. Each sample was tested in the native state and served as its own control. After complete capsulotomy, 1 of 5 AC capsular repair configurations was performed: anterior, superior, posterior, O-frame, and X-frame. After testing of the AC capsular repair configurations, the tests were repeated after dissection of the CC ligaments and after CC ligament reconstruction with a suture button system. AC joint stability was immediately tested after each step under rotation and horizontal translation. To accomplish this, the AC joints were anatomically positioned on a custom fixture linked to a servohydraulic testing system. A 3-dimensional optical measuring system was used to evaluate the 3-dimensional joint motion. Clavicle posterior translation in relation to the acromion, rotation around the long axis of the clavicle, and displacement of the lateral clavicle in relation to the center of rotation were measured. The torques and forces required to rotate and translate the clavicle were recorded.
RESULTS: In terms of translational testing, after the complete capsulotomy, a significant reduction of resistance force was found across all groups, with a mean 13% to 20% remaining ( P < .05). All AC suture augmentations were able to significantly increase the average resistance force as compared with the native ( P = .01) against posterior translation. Subsequent cutting of the CC ligaments did not result in a significant change in any of the groups ( P = .23). The synergistic effect of AC capsule augmentation and CC ligament reconstruction could be demonstrated without exception. In terms of rotational testing, the complete capsulotomy resulted in a significant reduction of resistance torque in all groups ( P < .05), with a remaining torque ranging between 2% and 11% across the groups. However, all AC suture constructs significantly increased the resistance torque as compared with the capsulotomy ( P = .01). The subsequent cutting of the CC ligaments resulted in a significant change in 2 of the 5 groups (O-frame, P = .01; X-frame, P = .02) and an overall remaining torque reduction ranging from 3% and 42%. The combined reconstruction of the AC capsule and CC ligaments achieved the highest percentage of regained resistance torque but remained significantly weaker than the native specimen ( P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Native translational stability could be restored by the addition of AC capsule augmentation, while partial rotational instability remained. The tested constructs revealed no significant individual differences. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Combined stabilization of the AC capsule and CC ligaments demonstrated the greatest capacity to restore the native stability against translational and rotational loads, with the specific configuration of the AC capsule repair to be chosen according to the personal preferences of the surgeon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC brace; AC capsule; AC joint; acromioclavicular reconstruction; suture cerclage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30419178     DOI: 10.1177/0363546518807908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Tobias Schöbel; Jean-Pierre Fischer; Sabine Löffler; Georg Osterhoff; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sircana; Maristella F Saccomanno; Fabrizio Mocini; Vincenzo Campana; Piermarco Messinese; Andrea Monteleone; Andrea Salvi; Alessandra Scaini; Almerico Megaro; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage.

Authors:  Gunnar Jensen; Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra; Mireille Al-Ibadi; Katharina Salmoukas; Jan Christoph Katthagen; Helmut Lill; Alexander Ellwein
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-07

4.  Clinical and radiological outcome of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A retrospective cohort study on Hook plate versus arthroscopic assisted single coracoclavicular tunnel with DogBone™ button dual FiberTape® construct.

Authors:  Sandesh Madi; Vivek Pandey; Sujayendra Murali; Kiran Acharya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-03-04

5.  Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Knut Beitzel; Simon Archambault; Aulon Jerliu; Mark P Cote; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-16

6.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  High grade acromioclavicular injury: Comparison of arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Arrisna Artha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-25

8.  Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Type III/V Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.

Authors:  Lukas N Muench; Cameron Kia; Aulon Jerliu; Matthew Murphy; Daniel P Berthold; Mark P Cote; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-26

9.  Arthroscopy-Assisted All-Suture Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.

Authors:  Amit Joshi; Bibek Basukala; Nagmani Singh; Sanjeeb Rijal; Dhan Bahadur Karki; Rohit Bista; Ishor Pradhan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-04-18

10.  Effect of Rotator Cuff Deficiencies on Muscle Forces and Glenohumeral Contact Force After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Zhenxian Chen; Xunjian Fan; Yongchang Gao; Jing Zhang; Lei Guo; Shibin Chen; Zhongmin Jin
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.