Literature DB >> 30419062

Association of specific gene mutations derived from machine learning with survival in lung adenocarcinoma.

Han-Jun Cho1,2, Soonchul Lee3, Young Geon Ji4, Dong Hyeon Lee1.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the United States and the leading cause of mortality in cancer patients. Biomarkers predicting survival of patients with lung cancer have a profound effect on patient prognosis and treatment. However, predictive biomarkers for survival and their relevance for lung cancer are not been well known yet. The objective of this study was to perform machine learning with data from The Cancer Genome Atlas of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) to find survival-specific gene mutations that could be used as survival-predicting biomarkers. To identify survival-specific mutations according to various clinical factors, four feature selection methods (information gain, chi-squared test, minimum redundancy maximum relevance, and correlation) were used. Extracted survival-specific mutations of LUAD were applied individually or as a group for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Mutations in MMRN2 and GMPPA were significantly associated with patient mortality while those in ZNF560 and SETX were associated with patient survival. Mutations in DNAJC2 and MMRN2 showed significant negative association with overall survival while mutations in ZNF560 showed significant positive association with overall survival. Mutations in MMRN2 showed significant negative association with disease-free survival while mutations in DRD3 and ZNF560 showed positive associated with disease-free survival. Mutations in DRD3, SETX, and ZNF560 showed significant positive association with survival in patients with LUAD while the opposite was true for mutations in DNAJC2, GMPPA, and MMRN2. These gene mutations were also found in other cohorts of LUAD, lung squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell lung cancer. In LUAD of Pan-Lung Cancer cohort, mutations in GMPPA, DNAJC2, and MMRN2 showed significant negative associations with survival of patients while mutations in DRD3 and SETX showed significant positive association with survival. In this study, machine learning was conducted to obtain information necessary to discover specific gene mutations associated with the survival of patients with LUAD. Mutations in the above six genes could predict survival rate and disease-free survival rate in patients with LUAD. Thus, they are important biomarker candidates for prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30419062      PMCID: PMC6231670          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  33 in total

1.  Machine Learning Identifies Stemness Features Associated with Oncogenic Dedifferentiation.

Authors:  Tathiane M Malta; Artem Sokolov; Andrew J Gentles; Tomasz Burzykowski; Laila Poisson; John N Weinstein; Bożena Kamińska; Joerg Huelsken; Larsson Omberg; Olivier Gevaert; Antonio Colaprico; Patrycja Czerwińska; Sylwia Mazurek; Lopa Mishra; Holger Heyn; Alex Krasnitz; Andrew K Godwin; Alexander J Lazar; Joshua M Stuart; Katherine A Hoadley; Peter W Laird; Houtan Noushmehr; Maciej Wiznerowicz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Guidelines for the nomenclature of the human heat shock proteins.

Authors:  Harm H Kampinga; Jurre Hageman; Michel J Vos; Hiroshi Kubota; Robert M Tanguay; Elspeth A Bruford; Michael E Cheetham; Bin Chen; Lawrence E Hightower
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Mapping the hallmarks of lung adenocarcinoma with massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Marcin Imielinski; Alice H Berger; Peter S Hammerman; Bryan Hernandez; Trevor J Pugh; Eran Hodis; Jeonghee Cho; James Suh; Marzia Capelletti; Andrey Sivachenko; Carrie Sougnez; Daniel Auclair; Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Kristian Cibulskis; Kyusam Choi; Luc de Waal; Tanaz Sharifnia; Angela Brooks; Heidi Greulich; Shantanu Banerji; Thomas Zander; Danila Seidel; Frauke Leenders; Sascha Ansén; Corinna Ludwig; Walburga Engel-Riedel; Erich Stoelben; Jürgen Wolf; Chandra Goparju; Kristin Thompson; Wendy Winckler; David Kwiatkowski; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne; Vincent A Miller; William Pao; William D Travis; Harvey I Pass; Stacey B Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Roman K Thomas; Levi A Garraway; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Association of Omics Features with Histopathology Patterns in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kun-Hsing Yu; Gerald J Berry; Daniel L Rubin; Christopher Ré; Russ B Altman; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 10.304

6.  Blocking CLEC14A-MMRN2 binding inhibits sprouting angiogenesis and tumour growth.

Authors:  P J Noy; P Lodhia; K Khan; X Zhuang; D G Ward; A R Verissimo; A Bacon; R Bicknell
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Classification of breast cancer patients using somatic mutation profiles and machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Suleyman Vural; Xiaosheng Wang; Chittibabu Guda
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2016-08-26

8.  Gender Specific Mutation Incidence and Survival Associations in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (CCRCC).

Authors:  Christopher J Ricketts; W Marston Linehan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Possible pathways used to predict different stages of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Qiongyu Duan; Ying Xuan; Yunan Sun; Rong Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Machine Learning Detects Pan-cancer Ras Pathway Activation in The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Authors:  Gregory P Way; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Konnor La; Joshua Armenia; Walid K Chatila; Augustin Luna; Chris Sander; Andrew D Cherniack; Marco Mina; Giovanni Ciriello; Nikolaus Schultz; Yolanda Sanchez; Casey S Greene
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 9.423

View more
  11 in total

1.  TGF-β promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition via NF-κB/NOX4/ROS signal pathway in lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Mingze Ma; Fengxian Shi; Ruonan Zhai; Hang Wang; Ke Li; Chunyan Xu; Wu Yao; Fang Zhou
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  A Multi-Gene Model Effectively Predicts the Overall Prognosis of Stomach Adenocarcinomas With Large Genetic Heterogeneity Using Somatic Mutation Features.

Authors:  Xianming Liu; Xinjie Hui; Huayu Kang; Qiongfang Fang; Aiyue Chen; Yueming Hu; Desheng Lu; Xianxiong Chen; Yejun Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Classify multicategory outcome in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using clinical, transcriptomic and clinico-transcriptomic data: machine learning versus multinomial models.

Authors:  Fei Deng; Lanlan Shen; He Wang; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  FLOating-Window Projective Separator (FloWPS): A Data Trimming Tool for Support Vector Machines (SVM) to Improve Robustness of the Classifier.

Authors:  Victor Tkachev; Maxim Sorokin; Artem Mescheryakov; Alexander Simonov; Andrew Garazha; Anton Buzdin; Ilya Muchnik; Nicolas Borisov
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Development and Validation of a Scoring System Based on 9 Glycolysis-Related Genes for Prognosis Prediction in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tianqi Luo; Yufei Du; Jinling Duan; Chengcai Liang; Guoming Chen; Kaiming Jiang; Yongming Chen; Yingbo Chen
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

6.  Cancer prognosis prediction using somatic point mutation and copy number variation data: a comparison of gene-level and pathway-based models.

Authors:  Xingyu Zheng; Christopher I Amos; H Robert Frost
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Cancer gene expression profiles associated with clinical outcomes to chemotherapy treatments.

Authors:  Nicolas Borisov; Maxim Sorokin; Victor Tkachev; Andrew Garazha; Anton Buzdin
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Identifying Novel Cell Glycolysis-Related Gene Signature Predictive of Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Jiaxuan Zou; Ziwei Wang; Ge Li; Yi Lei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Profiling in Helicobacter pylori-Induced Gastric Cancer Identified Prognosis- and Immunotherapy-Relevant Gene Signatures.

Authors:  Duanrui Liu; Jingyu Zhu; Xiaoli Ma; Lulu Zhang; Yufei Wu; Wenshuai Zhu; Yuanxin Xing; Yanfei Jia; Yunshan Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-24

10.  Development of a novel prognostic score combining clinicopathologic variables, gene expression, and mutation profiles for lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guofeng Li; Guangsuo Wang; Yanhua Guo; Shixuan Li; Youlong Zhang; Jialu Li; Bin Peng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.