Literature DB >> 30418689

Muscle-induced loading as an important source of variation in craniofacial skeletal shape.

Andrew J Conith1, Daniel T Lam1, R Craig Albertson1.   

Abstract

The shape of the craniofacial skeleton is constantly changing through ontogeny and reflects a balance between developmental patterning and mechanical-load-induced remodeling. Muscles are a major contributor to producing the mechanical environment that is crucial for "normal" skull development. Here, we use an F5 hybrid population of Lake Malawi cichlids to characterize the strength and types of associations between craniofacial bones and muscles. We focus on four bones/bone complexes, with different developmental origins, alongside four muscles with distinct functions. We used micro-computed tomography to extract 3D information on bones and muscles. 3D geometric morphometrics and volumetric measurements were used to characterize bone and muscle shape, respectively. Linear regressions were performed to test for associations between bone shape and muscle volume. We identified three types of associations between muscles and bones: weak, strong direct (i.e., muscles insert directly onto bone), and strong indirect (i.e., bone is influenced by muscles without a direct connection). In addition, we show that although the shape of some bones is relatively robust to muscle-induced mechanical stimulus, others appear to be highly sensitive to muscular input. Our results imply that the roles for muscular input on skeletal shape extend beyond specific points of origin or insertion and hold significant potential to influence broader patterns of craniofacial geometry. Thus, changes in the loading environment, either as a normal course of ontogeny or if an organism is exposed to a novel environment, may have pronounced effects on skeletal shape via near and far-ranging effects of muscular loading.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; cichlid; craniofacial; geometric morphometrics; muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30418689      PMCID: PMC6819996          DOI: 10.1002/dvg.23263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genesis        ISSN: 1526-954X            Impact factor:   2.487


  58 in total

1.  Genetic basis of adaptive shape differences in the cichlid head.

Authors:  R C Albertson; J T Streelman; T D Kocher
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 2.  Boning up on Wolff's Law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone.

Authors:  Jan-Hung Chen; Chao Liu; Lidan You; Craig A Simmons
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  The Hippo pathway: regulators and regulations.

Authors:  Fa-Xing Yu; Kun-Liang Guan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: the molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies.

Authors:  R Craig Albertson; J Todd Streelman; Thomas D Kocher; Pamela C Yelick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Baby fish working out: an epigenetic source of adaptive variation in the cichlid jaw.

Authors:  Yinan Hu; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Musculoskeletal patterning in the pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish embryo.

Authors:  T F Schilling; C B Kimmel
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Nested Levels of Adaptive Divergence: The Genetic Basis of Craniofacial Divergence and Ecological Sexual Dimorphism.

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Jason Wang; Graeme Anderson; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Local mechanical stimuli regulate bone formation and resorption in mice at the tissue level.

Authors:  Friederike A Schulte; Davide Ruffoni; Floor M Lambers; David Christen; Duncan J Webster; Gisela Kuhn; Ralph Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Skeletogenic fate of zebrafish cranial and trunk neural crest.

Authors:  Erika Kague; Michael Gallagher; Sally Burke; Michael Parsons; Tamara Franz-Odendaal; Shannon Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Adaptive plasticity in the mouse mandible.

Authors:  Philip S L Anderson; Sabrina Renaud; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prevalence and associated factors of myofascial pain in orthognathic patients with skeletal class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lucas Caetano Uetanabaro; Jennifer Tsi Gerber; Katheleen Miranda Dos Santos; Michelle Nascimento Meger; Delson João da Costa; Erika Calvano Küchler; Aline Monise Sebastiani; Rafaela Scariot
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-03-09

2.  Weak genetic signal for phenotypic integration implicates developmental processes as major regulators of trait covariation.

Authors:  Andrew J Conith; Sylvie A Hope; Brian H Chhouk; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  The perioral muscle continuum affects premaxillary development in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Weiwei Bian; Rao Fu; Jing Wang; Jian Wang; Jia Zhou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Morphological association between the muscles and bones in the craniofacial region.

Authors:  Masahito Yamamoto; Hiromasa Takada; Satoshi Ishizuka; Kei Kitamura; Juhee Jeong; Masaki Sato; Nobuyuki Hinata; Shinichi Abe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Does phenotypic plasticity initiate developmental bias?

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Kirsty McWhinnie; Natalie Pilakouta; Lynsey Walker
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Ecomorphological divergence and habitat lability in the context of robust patterns of modularity in the cichlid feeding apparatus.

Authors:  Andrew J Conith; Michael R Kidd; Thomas D Kocher; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 7.  Making and shaping endochondral and intramembranous bones.

Authors:  Gabriel L Galea; Mohamed R Zein; Steven Allen; Philippa Francis-West
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.842

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.