| Literature DB >> 30418681 |
Marinus H Van Ijzendoorn1, Miriam Steele2, Pehr Granqvist3.
Abstract
In the service of children's best interests, we argue for a sharpening of the evidentiary standards used in family court decision making, from preponderance of (occasionally substandard) evidence to "beyond a reasonable doubt." Second, we call for a move in child protection cases from static diagnoses (e.g., attachment classifications) to assessments of the potential for enhanced parenting. Finally, informed by the implications of the replication crisis in the biomedical and psychological sciences, we applaud the move of the attachment field forward to large-scale, collective research agendas and goals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30418681 DOI: 10.1002/imhj.21751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infant Ment Health J ISSN: 0163-9641