Tanja Eisemann1,2, Barbara Costa1, Patrick N Harter3,4,5, Wolfgang Wick4,5,6, Michel Mittelbronn3,4,5,7,8,9,10, Peter Angel1, Heike Peterziel1,11. 1. Division of Signal Transduction and Growth Control, DKFZ/ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Faculty of Biosciences, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Institute of Neurology (Edinger-Institute), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. 4. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. 5. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 6. Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Luxembourg Centre of Neuropathology, Luxembourg. 8. Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg. 9. NORLUX Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg. 10. Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg. 11. Clinical Cooperation Unit Pediatric Oncology, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment options of glioblastoma, the most aggressive primary brain tumor with frequent relapses and high mortality, are still very limited, urgently calling for novel therapeutic targets. Expression of the glycoprotein podoplanin correlates with poor prognosis in various cancer entities, including glioblastoma. Furthermore, podoplanin has been associated with tumor cell migration and proliferation in vitro; however, experimental data on its function in gliomagenesis in vivo are still missing. Hence, we have functionally investigated the impact of podoplanin on glioblastoma in a preclinical mouse model to evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target. METHODS: Fluorescence activated cell sorting, genome-wide expression analysis, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9)-mediated deletion of podoplanin in patient-derived human glioblastoma cells were combined with organotypic brain slice cultures and intracranial injections into mice. RESULTS: We defined a malignant gene signature in tumor cells with high podoplanin expression. The increase and/or maintenance of high podoplanin expression in serial transplantations and in podoplaninlow-sorted glioblastoma cells during outgrowth indicated the association of high podoplanin expression and poor outcome. Unexpectedly, similar rates of proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and invasion were observed in control and podoplanin-deleted tumors. Accordingly, neither tumor growth nor survival was affected upon podoplanin loss. CONCLUSION: We report that tumor progression occurs independently of podoplanin. Thus, in contrast to previous suggestions, blocking of podoplanin does not represent a promising therapeutic approach. However, as podoplanin is associated with tumor aggressiveness and progression, we propose the cell surface protein as a biomarker for poor prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Treatment options of glioblastoma, the most aggressive primary brain tumor with frequent relapses and high mortality, are still very limited, urgently calling for novel therapeutic targets. Expression of the glycoprotein podoplanin correlates with poor prognosis in various cancer entities, including glioblastoma. Furthermore, podoplanin has been associated with tumor cell migration and proliferation in vitro; however, experimental data on its function in gliomagenesis in vivo are still missing. Hence, we have functionally investigated the impact of podoplanin on glioblastoma in a preclinical mouse model to evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target. METHODS: Fluorescence activated cell sorting, genome-wide expression analysis, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9)-mediated deletion of podoplanin in patient-derived humanglioblastoma cells were combined with organotypic brain slice cultures and intracranial injections into mice. RESULTS: We defined a malignant gene signature in tumor cells with high podoplanin expression. The increase and/or maintenance of high podoplanin expression in serial transplantations and in podoplaninlow-sorted glioblastoma cells during outgrowth indicated the association of high podoplanin expression and poor outcome. Unexpectedly, similar rates of proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and invasion were observed in control and podoplanin-deleted tumors. Accordingly, neither tumor growth nor survival was affected upon podoplanin loss. CONCLUSION: We report that tumor progression occurs independently of podoplanin. Thus, in contrast to previous suggestions, blocking of podoplanin does not represent a promising therapeutic approach. However, as podoplanin is associated with tumor aggressiveness and progression, we propose the cell surface protein as a biomarker for poor prognosis.
Authors: Kate L Lowe; Brenda A Finney; Carsten Deppermann; René Hägerling; Salomé L Gazit; Jon Frampton; Christopher Buckley; Eric Camerer; Bernhard Nieswandt; Friedemann Kiefer; Steve P Watson Journal: Blood Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Anoop P Patel; Itay Tirosh; John J Trombetta; Alex K Shalek; Shawn M Gillespie; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Daniel P Cahill; Brian V Nahed; William T Curry; Robert L Martuza; David N Louis; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Mario L Suvà; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein Journal: Science Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Julia Riedl; Matthias Preusser; Pegah Mir Seyed Nazari; Florian Posch; Simon Panzer; Christine Marosi; Peter Birner; Johannes Thaler; Christine Brostjan; Daniela Lötsch; Walter Berger; Johannes A Hainfellner; Ingrid Pabinger; Cihan Ay Journal: Blood Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Nadim Tawil; Rayhaan Bassawon; Brian Meehan; Ali Nehme; Laura Montermini; Tenzin Gayden; Nicolas De Jay; Cristiana Spinelli; Shilpa Chennakrishnaiah; Dongsic Choi; Lata Adnani; Michele Zeinieh; Nada Jabado; Claudia L Kleinman; Michael Witcher; Yasser Riazalhosseini; Nigel S Key; David Schiff; Steven P Grover; Nigel Mackman; Charles P Couturier; Kevin Petrecca; Mario L Suvà; Anoop Patel; Itay Tirosh; Hamed Najafabadi; Janusz Rak Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2021-03-23
Authors: Aram S Modrek; Eskil Eskilsson; Ravesanker Ezhilarasan; Qianghu Wang; Lindsey D Goodman; Yingwen Ding; Ze-Yan Zhang; Krishna P L Bhat; Thanh-Thuy T Le; Floris P Barthel; Ming Tang; Jie Yang; Lihong Long; Joy Gumin; Frederick F Lang; Roel G W Verhaak; Kenneth D Aldape; Erik P Sulman Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Teresa G Krieger; Stephan M Tirier; Jeongbin Park; Katharina Jechow; Tanja Eisemann; Heike Peterziel; Peter Angel; Roland Eils; Christian Conrad Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 12.300