Literature DB >> 30418273

Cross-Country Transportation Efficacy and Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Large-Diameter Ultra-Thin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

Mohit Parekh1,2, Alessandro Ruzza1, Bernhard Steger3, Colin E Willoughby4, Salwah Rehman5,6, Stefano Ferrari1, Diego Ponzin1, Stephen B Kaye5,6, Vito Romano5,6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of preloaded large-diameter ultra-thin grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) after cross-country shipment.
METHODS: A laboratory study in an eye bank and a clinical cohort study in an academic tertiary care center were performed. UT-DSAEK (9.5 mm diameter) grafts (n = 7) were prepared, loaded into a commercial device (iGlide; Eurobio, Les Ulis, France), preserved for 4 days at room temperature in transport medium, and analyzed. In a retrospective study, preloaded tissues (n = 39) for clinical use were prepared, transported from Italy to the United Kingdom, and surgically delivered into the eyes of patients undergoing UT-DSAEK. Central and peripheral endothelial cell density (ECD) and viability were measured before and after loading and storage of the grafts in the laboratory study. Clinically, best-corrected visual acuity, ECD before and at final follow-up, dislocation rate, primary graft failure, and surgical time were recorded.
RESULTS: In the laboratory study, postcut central graft thickness was 93.3 ± 17.2 μm. ECD and cell mortality did not change significantly before and after preservation (P = 0.8). Cell loss after 4 days of preservation was 1.7% ± 1.6%. Clinically, 39 eyes of 39 patients at final follow-up showed a mean central graft thickness of 88 ± 22 μm and a best-corrected visual acuity of 0.34 ± 0.24 logMAR. Nine of 39 cases (23%) needed rebubbling, and 28% cell loss was observed at final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Large-diameter UT-DSAEK grafts can be prepared and preloaded in the eye bank using the iGlide and transported to the surgical center facilitating surgery for patients undergoing UT-DSAEK, potentially reducing tissue wastage, surgical time, and costs related to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30418273     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of pre-loaded ultra-thin DSAEK and pre-loaded DMEK.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Luca Pagano; Kunal A Gadhvi; Giulia Coco; Mitchell Titley; Matthew Thomas Fenech; Stefano Ferrari; Hannah J Levis; Mohit Parekh; Stephen Kaye
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-16

2.  Prelamellar Dissection Donor Corneal Thickness Is Associated With Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Operative Complications in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Kevin W Ross; Christopher G Stoeger; George O D Rosenwasser; Robert C OʼBrien; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Beth Ann Benetz; Patricia Dahl; Donna C Drury; Steven P Dunn; Sameera M Farazdaghi; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Shahzad I Mian; Michael L Nordlund; Jeffrey G Penta; Mark C Soper; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier; Doyce V Williams; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.152

3.  Optimisation of Storage and Transportation Conditions of Cultured Corneal Endothelial Cells for Cell Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Wahlig; Gary S L Peh; Khadijah Adnan; Heng-Pei Ang; Chan N Lwin; F Morales-Wong; Hon Shing Ong; Matthew Lovatt; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Role of AS-OCT in Managing Corneal Disorders.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Akhil Varshney; Muralidhar Ramappa; Sayan Basu; Vito Romano; Manisha Acharya; Abha Gaur; Neha Kapur; Aastha Singh; Gaurav Shah; Isha Chaudhary; Nikunj Patel; Anil Tiwari; Anahita Kate; Virender Sangwan; Umang Mathur
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.