Literature DB >> 3041818

Cefoperazone versus ceftazidime monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia.

R J Mangi1, J Ryan, C Berenson, T Greco, M Simms, G Thornton, V T Andriole.   

Abstract

Cefoperazone and ceftazidime monotherapy were compared in a randomized, prospective evaluation of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. These antibiotics were equally effective, with an overall successful treatment rate of 45 of 62 (73 percent) for cefoperazone-treated patients and 50 of 63 (79 percent) for ceftazidime-treated patients (p = 0.41). There was no difference in the incidence of side effects (including hypoprothrombinemia), superinfections, or colonization of the oropharynx with yeast, enterococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, or resistant gram-negative bacilli. When antibiotic administration, and laboratory costs are considered, cefoperazone is less expensive than ceftazidime. Both cefoperazone and ceftazidime are effective therapy for nosocomial pneumonia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3041818     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90174-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systemic antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  K E Unertl; F P Lenhart; H Forst; K Peter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Cost-effective treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  J C Garrelts; A M Herrington
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Single agent therapy for infections in cancer patients: a prospective randomized trial comparing three extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

Authors:  K V Rolston; P G Jones; V Fainstein; N M Khardori; E J Anaissie; L Steelhammer; G P Bodey
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group.

Authors:  M P Fink; D R Snydman; M S Niederman; K V Leeper; R H Johnson; S O Heard; R G Wunderink; J W Caldwell; J J Schentag; G A Siami
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Systemic antimicrobial therapy of nosocomial pneumonia: monotherapy versus combination therapy.

Authors:  F M LaForce
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Ceftazidime. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  C P Rains; H M Bryson; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: report of the working party on hospital-acquired pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Authors:  R G Masterton; A Galloway; G French; M Street; J Armstrong; E Brown; J Cleverley; P Dilworth; C Fry; A D Gascoigne; Alan Knox; Dilip Nathwani; Robert Spencer; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.790

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.