Literature DB >> 30417574

Dynamic genome and transcriptional network-based biomarkers and drugs: precision in breast cancer therapy.

Ioannis D Kyrochristos1,2, Demosthenes E Ziogas1,3, Dimitrios H Roukos1,2,4.   

Abstract

Despite remarkable progress in medium-term overall survival benefit in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant and metastatic settings, with multiple recent targeted drug approvals, acquired resistance, late relapse, and cancer-related death rates remain challenging. Integrated technological systems have been developed to overcome these unmet needs. The characterization of structural and functional noncoding genome elements through next-generation sequencing (NGS) systems, Hi-C and CRISPR/Cas9, as well as computational models, allows for whole genome and transcriptome analysis. Rapid progress in large-scale single-biopsy genome analysis has identified several novel breast cancer driver genes and oncotargets. The exploration of spatiotemporal tumor evolution has returned exciting while inconclusive data on dynamic intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) through multiregional NGS and single-cell DNA/RNA sequencing and circulating genomic subclones (cGSs) by serial circulating cell-free DNA NGS to predict and overcome intrinsic and acquired therapeutic resistance. This review discusses reliable breast cancer genome analysis data and focuses on two major crucial perspectives. The validation of ITH, cGSs, and intrapatient genetic/genomic heterogeneity as predictive biomarkers, as well as the valid discovery of novel oncotargets within patient-centric genomic trials, encouraging early drug development, could optimize primary and secondary therapeutic decision-making. A longer-term goal is to identify the individualized landscape of both coding and noncoding key mutations. This progress will enable the understanding of molecular mechanisms perturbating regulatory networks, shaping the pharmaceutical controllability of deregulated transcriptional biocircuits.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; breast cancer; drugs; intrapatient heterogeneity; next-generation sequencing systems; precision therapy; regulatory networks

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30417574     DOI: 10.1002/med.21549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Res Rev        ISSN: 0198-6325            Impact factor:   12.944


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of dynamic molecular networks: the progression from colorectal adenoma to cancer.

Authors:  Yuchen Jiang; Feifeng Song; Xiaoping Hu; Dandan Guo; Yujia Liu; Jiafeng Wang; Liehao Jiang; Ping Huang; Yiwen Zhang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12

2.  Molecular pathogenesis of breast cancer: impact of miR-99a-5p and miR-99a-3p regulation on oncogenic genes.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shinden; Tadahiro Hirashima; Nijiro Nohata; Hiroko Toda; Reona Okada; Shunichi Asai; Takako Tanaka; Yuto Hozaka; Takao Ohtsuka; Yuko Kijima; Naohiko Seki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Specific glioblastoma multiforme prognostic-subtype distinctions based on DNA methylation patterns.

Authors:  Huihui Ma; Chenggang Zhao; Zhiyang Zhao; Lizhu Hu; Fang Ye; Hongzhi Wang; Zhiyou Fang; Yuejin Wu; Xueran Chen
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.987

4.  A hypoxia-related signature for clinically predicting diagnosis, prognosis and immune microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Baohui Zhang; Bufu Tang; Jianyao Gao; Jiatong Li; Lingming Kong; Ling Qin
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis and Immune Cell Infiltration Using Gene Signature Associated with Inflammatory Response.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Da; Shuai Luo; Ming Huang; Fei Song; Rong Ding; Yao Xiao; Yang Fu; Yin-Shan Yang; Hai-Lei Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  A Novel Signature Integrated of Immunoglobulin, Glycosylation and Anti-Viral Genes to Predict Prognosis for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shengshan Xu; Yuchen Liu; Hansu Ma; Shuo Fang; Shoupeng Wei; Xiaoping Li; Zhuming Lu; Youbin Zheng; Tong Liu; Xiaojian Zhu; Dongming Xu; Yihang Pan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Aconitine induces cardiomyocyte damage by mitigating BNIP3-dependent mitophagy and the TNFα-NLRP3 signalling axis.

Authors:  Fu Peng; Nan Zhang; Chunting Wang; Xiaoyun Wang; Wei Huang; Cheng Peng; Gu He; Bo Han
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 8.  PI3K/AKT pathway as a key link modulates the multidrug resistance of cancers.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Youwen Chen; Guangzhi Liu; Chenxi Li; Yurong Song; Zhiwen Cao; Wen Li; Jinghong Hu; Cheng Lu; Yuanyan Liu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.