| Literature DB >> 30417038 |
Mohammad Hadi Dehghani1,2, Parvin Mahdavi1, Zoha Heidarinejad3,4.
Abstract
The aim of this data was to evaluate the efficiency of zinc oxide nanoparticles plus ultraviolet radiation (UV/ZnO) technology to remove Acid - 32 - Cyanine 5R. The effect of optimal parameters including initial pH (5,10), contact time (2-20 min), initial dye concentration (0.5-2 mg/L), and zinc oxide dosage (0.1 and 0.2 g/L) was investigated. The data showed that under alkaline conditions (pH = 10) and 0.2 g/L of ZnO nanoparticles, the maximum dye removal efficiency was observed under UV/ZnO process conditions. Furthermore, with the increase in Acid - 32 - Cyanine 5R dye concentration, the removal efficiency of the dye diminished, while with prolongation of the radiation time, the removal efficiency increased. In the presence of ultraviolet radiation, there is a need to longer time and higher radiation intensity for complete removal of the dye. However, in the presence of ZnO nanoparticles alone, around 5-10% of the dye is removed. The highest removal efficiency of Acid - 32 dye was through radiation by ultraviolet lamp 150 W at an initial dye concentration of 1 mg/L, in pH 5 and 10, respectively, at 98.5% and 99% respectively. On the other hand, through hybrid use of UV/ZnO, within a shorter time, complete removal (100%) is achieved. Generally, use of UV/ZnO process can be utilized as a suitable method for dye wastewaters treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Acid – 32 – Cyanine 5R; Aqueous solutions; Ultraviolet radiation; Zinc oxide nanoparticles
Year: 2018 PMID: 30417038 PMCID: PMC6216072 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency through radiation by ultraviolet lamp 150 W at pH = 10.
| Time (min) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| 2 | 67 | 75 | 48.5 | 58.5 |
| 4 | 75 | 81 | 53 | 62.5 |
| 6 | 80 | 87 | 60 | 66.5 |
| 8 | 88 | 92 | 65 | 71 |
| 10 | 90 | 93.5 | 70 | 74.5 |
| 12 | 93 | 95 | 75 | 78.5 |
| 14 | 95 | 97 | 79.5 | 83.5 |
| 16 | 96 | 97.5 | 83 | 86 |
| 18 | 98 | 98 | 85 | 87 |
| 20 | 98.5 | 98.5 | 89 | 89.5 |
The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency through radiation by ultraviolet lamp 150 W at pH = 5.
| Time (min) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| 2 | 71.5 | 78 | 5 | 59.5 |
| 4 | 79 | 84 | 58 | 64 |
| 6 | 81.5 | 88.5 | 63 | 68.5 |
| 8 | 87.5 | 93 | 67.5 | 73 |
| 10 | 90 | 94.5 | 72 | 76.5 |
| 12 | 93 | 95.5 | 79 | 84 |
| 14 | 94.5 | 97 | 83 | 87 |
| 16 | 96.5 | 98 | 86.5 | 89 |
| 18 | 98 | 98.2 | 88 | 90 |
| 20 | 98.5 | 99 | 91 | 91.5 |
Fig. 1The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency using ZnO nanoparticles alone under ZnO = 0.2 g/L and contact time of 20 min.
Fig. 2The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency using ZnO nanoparticles alone under ZnO = 0.1 g/L and contact time of 20 min.
Fig. 3A schematic of the photocatalyst reactor.
The qualitative properties of the studied dyeing wastewater.
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| pH | 7.5 |
| TSS | 205 mg/L |
| COD | 147 mg/L |
| BOD5 | 125 mg/L |
| Dye concentration | 385 ADMI |
ADMI: American Dye Manufactures Institute.
Fig. 4The Acid – 32- Cyanine 5R dye removal efficiency from real wastewater (dyeing) using the nanophotocatalytic method UV/ZnO under optimal process conditions.
The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency using the nanophotocatalytic method of UV/ZnO at pH = 10 and ZnO concentration = 0.2 g/L.
| Time (min) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| 2 | 96.6 | 97 | 97 | 97 |
| 4 | 98 | 97.5 | 97.5 | 98 |
| 6 | 98.6 | 98.2 | 98.2 | 98.4 |
| 8 | 100 | 98.5 | 99 | 98.8 |
| 10 | 99.2 | 99.5 | 99.4 | |
| 12 | 100 | 100 | 99.4 | |
| 14 | 100 | |||
The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency using the nanophotocatalytic method of UV/ZnO at pH = 5 and ZnO concentration = 0.2 g/L.
| Time (min) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| 2 | 96.6 | 96.4 | 96.7 | 97.6 |
| 4 | 97.3 | 97 | 97.5 | 97.6 |
| 6 | 98 | 97.8 | 98.2 | 98.4 |
| 8 | 98.6 | 98.5 | 98.7 | 99 |
| 10 | 99.3 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 99.4 |
| 12 | 100 | 100 | 99.2 | 99.6 |
| 14 | 100 | 100 | ||
The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency using the nanophotocatalytic method of UV/ZnO at pH = 10 and ZnO concentration = 0.1 g/L.
| Time (min) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| 2 | 95.3 | 95.7 | 96 | 96.2 |
| 4 | 96.6 | 96.8 | 96.7 | 97 |
| 6 | 98 | 97.5 | 97.7 | 97.8 |
| 8 | 98.6 | 98.2 | 98.2 | 98.4 |
| 10 | 100 | 98.5 | 99 | 98.8 |
| 12 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 99.2 | |
| 14 | 100 | 99.5 | 99.6 | |
| 16 | 100 | 100 | ||
The Acid – 32 dye removal efficiency using the nanophotocatalytic method of UV/ZnO at pH = 5 and ZnO concentration = 0.1 g/L.
| Time (min) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | |
| 2 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 96 |
| 4 | 96 | 96.4 | 96.7 | 96.6 |
| 6 | 96.6 | 97 | 97.7 | 97.4 |
| 8 | 98.6 | 97.8 | 98.2 | 98 |
| 10 | 100 | 98.5 | 99 | 98.4 |
| 12 | 98.9 | 99.2 | 98.8 | |
| 14 | 99.2 | 99.5 | 99.4 | |
| 16 | 100 | 100 | 99.6 | |
| 18 | 100 | |||
| Subject area | Environmental Chemistry |
| More specific subject area | Photo-catalytic removal |
| Type of data | Table and figure |
| How data was acquired | Batch experiments were performed to collect the data of the influence of ZnO dosage, initial dye concentration, contact time and pH on Acid – 32 – Cyanine 5R dye removal. The Acid – 32 – Cyanine 5R dye concentration was measured by a spectrophotometer device (Perkin – Elmer Lambada 25 – UV/Vis) at the wavelength of 400–700 nm. |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
| Experimental factors | The data of effects of main experimental parameters including ZnO dosage, initial dye concentration, contact time and solution pH were acquired. |
| Experimental features | The objective of this data was to Acid – 32 – Cyanine 5R dye removal from aqueous solutions using i) nanophotocatalytic UV/ZnO, ii) radiation alone (UV), and iii) ZnO nanoparticles alone. |
| Data source location | Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran |
| Data accessibility | The data are available with this article |
| Related research article | Oskoei V, Dehghani M, Nazmara S, Heibati B, Asif M, Tyagi I, et al. Removal of humic acid from aqueous solution using UV/ZnO nano-photocatalysis and adsorption. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2016;213:374–80. |