Literature DB >> 30416840

MOESHA: A Genetic Algorithm for Automatic Calibration and Estimation of Parameter Uncertainty and Sensitivity of Hydrologic Models.

Bradley L Barnhart1, Keith A Sawicz1, Darren L Ficklin2, Gerald W Whittaker3.   

Abstract

Characterization of the uncertainty and sensitivity of model parameters is an essential facet of hydrologic modeling. This article introduces the multi-objective evolutionary sensitivity handling algorithm (MOESHA) that combines input parameter uncertainty and sensitivity analyses with a genetic algorithm calibration routine to dynamically sample the parameter space. This novel algorithm serves as an alternative to traditional static space-sampling methods, such as stratified sampling or Latin hypercube sampling. In addition to calibrating model parameters to a hydrologic model, MOESHA determines the optimal distribution of model parameters that maximizes model robustness and minimizes error, and the results provide an estimate for model uncertainty due to the uncertainty in model parameters. Subsequently, we compare the model parameter distributions to the distribution of a dummy variable (i.e., a variable that does not affect model output) to differentiate between impactful (i.e., sensitive) and non-impactful parameters. In this way, an optimally calibrated model is produced, and estimations of model uncertainty as well as the relative impact of model parameters on model output (i.e., sensitivity) are determined. A case study using a single-cell hydrologic model (EXP-HYDRO) is used to test the method using river discharge data from the Dee River catchment in Wales. We compare the results of MOESHA with Sobol's global sensitivity analysis method and demonstrate that the algorithm is able to pinpoint non-impactful parameters, demonstrate the uncertainty of model results with respect to uncertainties in model parameters, and achieve excellent calibration results. A major drawback of the algorithm is that it is computationally expensive; therefore, parallelized methods should be used to reduce the computational burden.

Keywords:  Genetic algorithm; Hydrologic modeling; Model calibration; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty

Year:  2017        PMID: 30416840      PMCID: PMC6223138          DOI: 10.13031/trans.12179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans ASABE        ISSN: 2151-0032            Impact factor:   1.188


  2 in total

1.  Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization.

Authors:  Marco Laumanns; Lothar Thiele; Kalyanmoy Deb; Eckart Zitzler
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.277

2.  A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models.

Authors:  D M Hamby
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Embedding co-production and addressing uncertainty in watershed modeling decision-support tools: successes and challenges.

Authors:  Bradley L Barnhart; Heather E Golden; Joseph R Kasprzyk; James J Pauer; Chas E Jones; Keith A Sawicz; Nahal Hoghooghi; Michelle Simon; Robert B McKane; Paul M Mayer; Amy N Piscopo; Darren L Ficklin; Jonathan J Halama; Paul B Pettus; Brenda Rashleigh
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.288

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.