Literature DB >> 30416664

The long-term clinical outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale single institutional retrospective study.

Yuxing Jiang1, Yongliang Zhao1, Feng Qian1, Yan Shi1, Yingxue Hao1, Jun Chen1, Pingang Li1, Peiwu Yu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND
PURPOSE: Robotic surgery has been applied in gastric carcinoma over a decade. Although a series of studies were performed to investigate the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted gastrectomy, few papers were in view of long-term outcomes. The current study was aimed to explore the oncological outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.
METHODS: A total of 606 gastric cancer patients who underwent robot-assisted gastrectomy during March 2010 through March 2017, were enrolled in this research. The clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical procedures along with follow-up information and prognostic factors were recorded in detail. The disease-free survival and overall survival rates were tested by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: All the patients underwent the robotic surgery including 15 proximal gastrectomies, 403 distal gastrectomies, 169 total gastrectomies and 19 remnant gastrectomies. Fifiy-six (9.24%) patients were lost in the follow-up process (3-87 months, a media of 42 months). There were 119 recurrences observed, including 55 local recurrences, 51 peritoneal metastasis and 13 distant metastasis. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 73.60% and 74.24%, while the 5-year disease-free survivorship and overall survival rates were 68.73% and 69.33%. The 5-year overall survival rates grouped based on TNM stage were 96.58% for IA, 88.16% for IB, 87.03% for IIA, 80.62% fo IIB, 58.50% for IIIA, 48.62% for IIIB, 45.32% for IIIC and 17.03% for IV.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted gastrectomy is a valuable procedure for gastric cancer patients. Beside its feasibility and safety, it reveals an acceptable long-term clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; follow-up; long-term outcomes; robot-assisted gastrectomy; survival

Year:  2018        PMID: 30416664      PMCID: PMC6220210     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res            Impact factor:   4.060


  36 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Do Joong Park; Sang-Uk Han; Woo Jin Hyung; Min Chan Kim; Wook Kim; Seong Yeob Ryu; Seung-Wan Ryu; Kyo Young Song; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Gyu-Seok Cho; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Survival and surgical outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: case-control study.

Authors:  Bang Wool Eom; Young-Woo Kim; Sang Eok Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Jun Ho Lee; Hong Man Yoon; Soo-Jeong Cho; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Soo Jin Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes.

Authors:  Binghong Xiong; Li Ma; Caiquan Zhang
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.279

4.  Evaluation of the Seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification.

Authors:  Stefano Rausei; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Luigi Boni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Long-term oncologic outcomes from laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center experience of 601 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Sang-Woong Lee; Eiji Nomura; George Bouras; Takaya Tokuhara; Souichiro Tsunemi; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Seung Yoon Yang; Kun Ho Roh; You-Na Kim; Minah Cho; Seung Hyun Lim; Taeil Son; Woo Jin Hyung; Hyoung-Il Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted vs. open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and technical aspects of a case-control study.

Authors:  T Bo; Y Peiwu; Q Feng; Z Yongliang; S Yan; H Yingxue; L Huaxing
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masaya Nakauchi; Koichi Suda; Shibasaki Susumu; Shinichi Kadoya; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kuo-Hung Huang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Wen-Liang Fang; Jen-Hao Chen; Su-Shun Lo; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Chew-Wun Wu; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prognostic factors of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: Does robotic gastrectomy bring oncological benefit?

Authors:  Masaya Nakauchi; Koichi Suda; Susumu Shibasaki; Kenichi Nakamura; Shinichi Kadoya; Kenji Kikuchi; Kazuki Inaba; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Surgical and oncological outcomes of distal gastrectomy compared to total gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuxing Jiang; Fan Yang; Jingfu Ma; Ning Zhang; Chao Zhang; Gaoming Li; Zhengyan Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.111

3.  Does three-dimensional surgery affect recurrence patterns in patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic R0 gastrectomy? Results from a 3-year follow-up phase III trial.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Bin-Bin Xu; Zhi-Fang Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: single Western center results.

Authors:  Luigi Marano; Alessia D'Ignazio; Luca Resca; Daniele Marrelli; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-14

Review 5.  Risk Assessment and Preventive Treatment for Peritoneal Recurrence Following Radical Resection for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Lin Xiang; Shuai Jin; Peng Zheng; Ewetse Paul Maswikiti; Yang Yu; Lei Gao; Jing Zhang; Ying Zhang; Hao Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Pooled analysis of the oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Ying Wu; Xiu-Feng Lin; Ping Yang; Wei Li
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.