Literature DB >> 30415992

The prognostic value of p16 and p53 expression for survival after vulvar cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Freja Lærke Sand1, Ditte Maria Bjerno Nielsen1, Marie Hoffmann Frederiksen2, Christina Louise Rasmussen1, Susanne K Kjaer3.   

Abstract

The tumor suppressor proteins p16 and p53 have been suggested to have prognostic value in some human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers, however, this has been less well established for vulvar cancer. The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to examine the prognostic value of p16 and p53 expression status on survival after vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). We conducted a thorough systematic literature search of multiple databases to identify studies examining survival after histolocally verified VSCC that were tested for p16 and/or p53. A total of 18 eligible studies were included. Using a fixed-effects model we calculated study-specific and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of 5-year overall survival (OS). In the analyses of OS, we included 475 VSCC cases tested for p16 expression of which 38% were p16 positive. The pooled HRp16 was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.29-0.55). In addition, the majority of results from studies with adjusted analyses on the prognostic value of p16 indicated that p16 expression status could be an independent prognostic marker for OS in women diagnosed with VSCC, and the same pattern was seen for disease specific survival (DSS). We also included 310 VSCC cases tested for p53 expression of which 54% were p53 positive. The pooled HRp53 was 1.81 (95% CI: 1.22-2.68) indicating that p53 positive VSCC have a significantly lower 5-year OS compared to p53 negative. The results in relation to p53 reported from adjusted analyses OS and on DSS and disease free survival were more equivocal. This meta-analysis and review suggests that p53 and especially p16 expression status are of prognostic importance in women diagnosed with VSCC. This may be clinically important in the future design of targeted therapy and when planning the optimal follow-up strategy. Future studies should include the combined use of biomarkers such as p16, p53 and HPV status.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Review; Survival; Vulvar cancer; p16; p53

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30415992     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  Major p53 immunohistochemical patterns in in situ and invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva and correlation with TP53 mutation status.

Authors:  Tjalling Bosse; Lynn N Hoang; Basile Tessier-Cloutier; Kim E Kortekaas; Emily Thompson; Jennifer Pors; Julia Chen; Julie Ho; Leah M Prentice; Melissa K McConechy; Christine Chow; Lily Proctor; Jessica N McAlpine; David G Huntsman; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Molecular pathways in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: implications for target therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Simona Maria Fragomeni; Frediano Inzani; Anna Fagotti; Luigi Della Corte; Stefano Gentileschi; Luca Tagliaferri; Gian Franco Zannoni; Giovanni Scambia; Giorgia Garganese
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  DNMT1 Enhances the Radiosensitivity of HPV-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas via Downregulating SMG1.

Authors:  Chunlin Zhang; Jiaoping Mi; Yuan Deng; Zeyi Deng; Dan Long; Zhaohui Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  PD-L1 expression and survival in p16-negative and -positive squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva.

Authors:  Bastian Czogalla; Deborah Pham; Fabian Trillsch; Miriam Rottmann; Julia Gallwas; Alexander Burges; Sven Mahner; Thomas Kirchner; Udo Jeschke; Doris Mayr; Elisa Schmoeckel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Expanding the Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and HPV Genotypic Features of High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Vulva With Morphology Mimicking Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia and/or Lichen Sclerosus.

Authors:  Laurie M Griesinger; Heather Walline; Grace Y Wang; Guadalupe Lorenzatti Hiles; Kathryn C Welch; Hope K Haefner; Richard W Lieberman; Stephanie L Skala
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  The Clinical Relevance of p16 and p53 Status in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva.

Authors:  Ellen L Barlow; Neil Lambie; Mark W Donoghoe; Zin Naing; Neville F Hacker
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Response: Letter regarding "The prognostic value of p16 and p53 expression for survival after vulvar cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis".

Authors:  Freja Lærke Sand; Ditte Maria Bjerno Nielsen; Marie Hoffmann Frederiksen; Christina Louise Rasmussen; Susanne K Kjaer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-09-03

8.  Letter regarding "The prognostic value of p16 and p53 expression for survival after vulvar cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis".

Authors:  Mingyang Jiang; Huachu Deng; Yunni Lin; Shanggui Su
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-08-30

Review 9.  PA28γ, an Accomplice to Malignant Cancer.

Authors:  Kexin Lei; Hetian Bai; Silu Sun; Chuan Xin; Jing Li; Qianming Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Combined COX-2/PPARγ Expression as Independent Negative Prognosticator for Vulvar Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nadine Ansorge; Christian Dannecker; Udo Jeschke; Elisa Schmoeckel; Doris Mayr; Helene H Heidegger; Aurelia Vattai; Maximiliane Burgmann; Bastian Czogalla; Sven Mahner; Sophie Fuerst
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.