Literature DB >> 30415902

Outcomes after neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for cT2-4N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis.

Whitney S Brandt1, Wanpu Yan1, Jian Zhou1, Kay See Tan2, Joseph Montecalvo3, Bernard J Park1, Prasad S Adusumilli1, James Huang1, Matthew J Bott1, Valerie W Rusch1, Daniela Molena1, William D Travis3, Mark G Kris4, Jamie E Chaft4, David R Jones5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Comparative survival between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cT2-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer has not been extensively studied.
METHODS: Patients with cT2-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer who received platinum-based chemotherapy were retrospectively identified. Exclusion criteria included stage IV disease, induction radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, chemotherapy tolerance, and ability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors response to predict survival. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, compared using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models, and stratified using matched pairs after propensity score matching.
RESULTS: In total, 330 patients met the inclusion criteria (n = 92/group after propensity-score matching; median follow-up, 42 months). Five-year disease-free survival was 49% (95% confidence interval, 39-61) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus 48% (95% confidence interval, 38-61) for adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .70). On multivariable analysis, disease-free survival was not associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.90; P = .737), nor was overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.30; P = .572). The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was more likely to receive full doses and cycles of chemotherapy (P = .014/0.005) and had fewer grade 3 or greater toxicities (P = .001). Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with disease-free survival (P = .035); 15% of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (14/92) had a major pathologic response.
CONCLUSIONS: Timing of chemotherapy, before or after surgery, is not associated with an improvement in overall or disease-free survival among patients with cT2-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer who undergo complete surgical resection.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; non–small cell lung cancer; propensity-matched analysis; survival

Year:  2018        PMID: 30415902      PMCID: PMC6344258          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  12 in total

1.  Driving the discussion about the greater propensity for doing better with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Abigail K Zamora; Anthony W Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer debate revisited.

Authors:  Chan Yeu Pu; Sai Yendamuri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer-is timing everything?

Authors:  Melanie P Subramanian; Varun Puri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Morbidity and mortality of lobectomy or pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant treatment: an analysis from the ESTS database.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli; Gaetano Rocco; Zalan Szanto; Pascal Thomas; Pierre Emmanuel Falcoz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Long-term outcomes following neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Junjie Xi; Yajing Du; Zhengyang Hu; Jiaqi Liang; Yunyi Bian; Zhencong Chen; Qihai Sui; Cheng Zhan; Ming Li; Weigang Guo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Treatment rationale and design of the induction chemotherapy and adjuvant thoracic radiation in resectable N2-3A/3B non-small cell lung cancer (ICAT) study.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tsunezuka; Masayoshi Inoue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant apatinib plus S-1 in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Chu Zhang; Xiang Wang; Miao Zhang; Dong Liu; Dun-Peng Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Review and perspective on adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies in NSCLC.

Authors:  Chengxiang Yi; Yayi He; Haoran Xia; Helin Zhang; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  The Emerging Importance of Tumor Genomics in Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Harry B Lengel; James G Connolly; Gregory D Jones; Raul Caso; Jian Zhou; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Brooke Mastrogiacomo; James M Isbell; Bob T Li; Yuan Liu; Natasha Rekhtman; David R Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with intraoperative radiotherapy is effective to prevent recurrence in high-risk non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Authors:  Olga V Pankova; Evgeny O Rodionov; Sergey V Miller; Sergey A Tuzikov; Liubov A Tashireva; Tatiana S Gerashchenko; Evgeny V Denisov; Vladimir M Perelmuter
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.