Literature DB >> 30415878

Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Young Hyo Choi1, Min Yong Kang1, Hyun Hwan Sung1, Hwang Gyun Jeon1, Byong Chang Jeong1, Seong Il Seo1, Seong Soo Jeon1, Chan Kyo Kim2, Byung Kwan Park2, Hyun Moo Lee3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare cancer detection rates between 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided target prostate biopsy (MRI-TBx) according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in biopsy-naive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 2009 biopsy-naive patients with suspected prostate cancer (PSA ≤20 ng/mL). Patients underwent TRUS-Bx (n = 1786) or MRI-guided target prostate biopsy (MRI-TBx; n = 223) from September 2013 to March 2017 and were stratified according to each of 4 PSA cutoffs. MRI-TBx was performed on lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores of 3 to 5 on mpMRI. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as Gleason ≥7. Propensity score matching was performed using the prebiopsy variables, which included age, PSA, prostate volume, and PSA density.
RESULTS: Propensity score matching resulted in 222 patients in each group. There were significant differences between the TRUS-Bx and MRI-TBx groups in the overall detection rates of prostate cancer (41.4% vs. 55.4%; P = .003) and csPCa (30.1% vs. 42.8%; P = .005). However, across PSA cutoffs, MRI-TBx detected more prostate cancer than TRUS-Bx at PSA levels of 2.5 to <4 (29.5% vs. 56.6%; P < .001). The csPCa detection rates of TRUS-Bx and MRI-TBx did not differ significantly within the PSA cutoffs. There was a significantly higher detection rate of prostate cancer and csPCa in lesions with PI-RADS scores 4 and 5 than in those with a score of 3.
CONCLUSION: Prebiopsy mpMRI and subsequent targeted biopsy had a higher detection rate than TRUS-Bx in patients with prostate cancer and csPCa.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Systematic random biopsy; Targeted biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30415878     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  3 in total

1.  Detection of prostate cancer using prostate imaging reporting and data system score and prostate-specific antigen density in biopsy-naive and prior biopsy-negative patients.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Ryoo; Min Yong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 2.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10

3.  Optimal PSA Threshold for Obtaining MRI-Fusion Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients.

Authors:  Luke L Wang; Brandon L Henslee; Peter B Sam; Chad A LaGrange; Shawna L Boyle
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2021-07-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.