Literature DB >> 3041558

Omeprazole or ranitidine in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Results of a double-blind, randomized, Scandinavian multicenter study.

S Sandmark1, R Carlsson, O Fausa, L Lundell.   

Abstract

One hundred and fifty-two patients with endoscopically verified erosive and/or ulcerative esophagitis entered a double-blind, randomized study comparing 20 mg omeprazole given once daily and ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. The efficacy and safety of 4 to 8 weeks' treatment were studied. Macroscopic healing of esophagitis was defined as complete epithelialization of all esophageal erosive and/or ulcerative lesions. One hundred and forty-four patients completed the first 4 weeks of treatment in accordance with the protocol. The healing rate was 67% in the omeprazole group and 31% in the ranitidine group (p less than 0.0001). The corresponding figures after 8 weeks' treatment were 85% and 50%, respectively (p less than 0.0001). The higher healing rate for omeprazole was also accompanied by a significantly faster and more substantial improvement in reflux symptoms. In the patient's own overall evaluation of symptoms, these had resolved in 51% of the omeprazole-treated patients already at the end of the 1st week of treatment, compared with 27% of those given ranitidine (p = 0.009). Both omeprazole and ranitidine were well tolerated, and there were no adverse events or clinically significant changes in the laboratory values attributable to the trial medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3041558     DOI: 10.3109/00365528809093923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  59 in total

1.  What is heartburn worth? A cost-utility analysis of management strategies.

Authors:  G R Heudebert; R M Centor; J C Klapow; R Marks; L Johnson; C M Wilcox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Assessment of reflux symptom severity: methodological options and their attributes.

Authors:  P Bytzer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Best practice in symptom assessment: a review.

Authors:  E McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Gastroenterology.

Authors:  L J O'Donnell; E M Alstead; M J Farthing
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Omeprazole.

Authors:  M J Langman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-31

Review 6.  A systematic review of symptomatic outcomes used in oesophagitis drug therapy trials.

Authors:  N Sharma; C Donnellan; C Preston; B Delaney; G Duckett; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Does massive obesity promote abnormal gastroesophageal reflux?

Authors:  L Lundell; M Ruth; N Sandberg; M Bove-Nielsen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Erosive oesophagitis: outcome of repeated long term maintenance treatment with low dose omeprazole 10 mg or placebo.

Authors:  K D Bardhan; P Cherian; A Vaishnavi; R B Jones; M Thompson; P Morris; A Brooks; J D'Silva; K R Gillon; C Wason; J Patterson; J Polak; A Bishop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases.

Authors:  S M Grant; H D Langtry; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six year follow up of 107 patients.

Authors:  E Kuster; E Ros; V Toledo-Pimentel; A Pujol; J M Bordas; L Grande; C Pera
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.