Literature DB >> 30415453

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Osteoarthritis Quality of Life (OAQoL) questionnaire for use in Portugal.

João Lagoas Gomes1,2, Ana Filipa Águeda3, Alice Heaney4, Cátia Duarte5,6, Carina Lopes7,8, Tiago Costa7,8, José Marona7,8, Santiago Rodrigues-Manica7,8, Sara Maia8, Manuela Costa7, Jaime C Branco7,8, Stephen P McKenna4, Anabela Barcelos3,9, Fernando M Pimentel-Santos7,8.   

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent rheumatic disease and is a leading cause of decreased quality of life (QoL). The OA Quality of Life questionnaire (OAQoL) is an OA-specific patient-reported outcome measures. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the original UK English version of the Osteoarthritis Quality of Life (OAQoL) questionnaire into European Portuguese. The translation of the questionnaire was carried out according to a dual panel methodology (bilingual panel followed by lay panel). This was followed by cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs) with OA patients to assess comprehension and relevance of the translated questionnaire. Finally, a validation survey was conducted to assess its psychometric properties. The Portuguese OAQoL, a comparator scale (the Nottingham Health Profile-NHP) as well as questions relating to demographic and disease information were administered to OA patients. A sub-sample of patients also completed the Portuguese OAQoL two weeks later, to assess test-retest reliability. The internal consistency, construct validity and known group validity (according to perceived OA severity) of the scale was also assessed. Both the bilingual and lay panels consisted of five individuals and no major difficulties relating to the translation process were identified. A total of ten patients with OA participated in the CDIs. The mean time to complete the questionnaire was 5 min. These interviews revealed that the Portuguese version of the OAQoL was clear, relevant and easy to complete. Finally, 53 OA patients (44 females; mean age of 67.6 years) completed the validation survey. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.87, demonstrating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability, assessed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, was 0.86. Moderate correlations were found with the majority of the NHP sections, providing evidence of construct validity. Significant differences in OAQoL scores were found between patients who differed according to their perceived OA severity, providing evidence of known group validity. The Portuguese version of the OAQoL is a valid and reliable questionnaire that can be used to assess QoL in OA, both in clinical practice and for research purposes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative arthritis; OAQoL; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis Quality of Life questionnaire; Patient-reported outcome measures; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30415453     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-4197-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  28 in total

1.  Care and management of osteoarthritis in adults: summary of NICE guidance.

Authors:  Philip G Conaghan; John Dickson; Robert L Grant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-01

Review 2.  Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Duarte Pereira; Elisabete Ramos; Jaime Branco
Journal:  Acta Med Port       Date:  2015-02-27

3.  Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.

Authors:  Diane Wild; Alyson Grove; Mona Martin; Sonya Eremenco; Sandra McElroy; Aneesa Verjee-Lorenz; Pennifer Erikson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R Altman; G Alarcón; D Appelrouth; D Bloch; D Borenstein; K Brandt; C Brown; T D Cooke; W Daniel; D Feldman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1991-05

5.  The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Donald L Patrick; Jordi Alonso; Paul W Stratford; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Osteoarthritis: epidemiology.

Authors:  Nigel Arden; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.098

7.  Osteoarthritis: From Palliation to Prevention: AOA Critical Issues.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Michael B Millis; Steven A Olson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Development and validation of a needs-based quality of life instrument for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Anne-Maree Keenan; Stephen P McKenna; Lynda C Doward; Philip G Conaghan; Paul Emery; Alan Tennant
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-06-15

9.  Effects of method of translation of patient-reported health outcome questionnaires: a randomized study of the translation of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL) Instrument for Sweden.

Authors:  Peter Hagell; Per-Johan Hedin; David M Meads; Lennart Nyberg; Stephen P McKenna
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Anna Litwic; Mark H Edwards; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.291

View more
  1 in total

1.  Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the osteoarthritis quality of life questionnaire (OAQoL) in Saudi patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Mansour AlAjmi; Sameer Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.186

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.