Literature DB >> 30415112

Semen collection by electro-stimulation in a variety of bird orders.

Mayra H Frediani1, Fernanda J V Guida2, Paula A B Salgado2, Débora R Gonçalves3, Marcel H Blank1, Gabriel A Novaes1, Ricardo J G Pereira4.   

Abstract

It is unquestinable that artificial insemination (AI) offers many benefits to avian conservation programs, but a serious impediment towards implementing AI for wild species is the development of effective techniques to consistently collect good quality ejaculates. Thus, we aimed to examine the success rate of electro-stimulation (ES) in collecting semen from 49 unconditioned males from orders Piciformes, Strigiformes, Accipitriformes, Cathartiformes, Galiformes, Anseriformes and Psittaciformes at different times of the year. Sixty out of 299 ES attempts provided ejaculates with sperm, but collection success rates varied widely (0-50%) depending on the species. Except for swans whose greater results were registered during spring-summer, males from most orders responded better to ES during winter-spring, suggesting seasonal variations on semen collection success rates. Overall, ES enabled successful semen collection from males of unproven and proven fertility under mixed pairing conditions. However, the highest success rate occurred in paired males with fertile clutches (40.6%) followed by unpaired males (22.1%), paired males without clutches (13.9%), and paired males with infertile clutches (6.8%). Behavioral responses of male birds to electrical impulses were also recorded to assess any discomfort during semen collection. Furthermore, macroscopic and microscopic analysis provided ejaculate parameters from several species, even from orders that hitherto have never been assessed for semen collection, which may serve as a starting point in the future. Altogether, these findings demonstrate the feasibility of ES in collecting semen from unpaired, unconditioned and non-imprinted males from a variety of bird orders. In the medium to long term, the use of this technique in both captive and free-ranging populations offers new perspectives to ensure genetic diversity in avian conservation programs.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; Avian sperm; Cracids; Parrots; Raptors; Toucans; Waterfowl

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30415112     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of Sperm Viability and Computer-Assisted Motility Analysis in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Effect of Several In Vitro Processing Conditions.

Authors:  Manuela Madeddu; Stefano Marelli; Ahmad Abdel Sayed; Fabio Mosca; Silvia Cerolini; Luisa Zaniboni
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2022-03-22

2.  Seasonal effect on semen availability and quality of racing pigeon in Thailand.

Authors:  Suwarak Wannaratana; Em-On Olanratmanee; Kuekaroon Charoenmuang; Thanvarath Boriharnthanawuth; Banpatee Tangtrongwanich; Thanawan Jongpattana; Yanita Sukhor; Arrita Kongthip; Thanida Sananmuang
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-06-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.