Literature DB >> 30414772

In vitro comparison of the hemocompatibility of two centrifugal left ventricular assist devices.

Rashad Zayat1, Ajay Moza2, Oliver Grottke3, Tim Grzanna2, Tamara Fechter3, Tadashi Motomura4, Christian Schmidt-Mewes4, Thomas Breuer5, Rüdiger Autschbach2, Rolf Rossaint3, Andreas Goetzenich2, Christian Bleilevens3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Shear stress from left ventricular assist devices induces von Willebrand factor degradation and platelet dysfunction, leading to nonsurgical bleeding. We characterized the hemostatic changes induced by 2 centrifugal left ventricular assist devices, the HeartMate 3 (Abbott Inc, Chicago, Ill) and the EVAHEART (Evaheart Inc, Houston, Tex), for comparison.
METHODS: Whole blood from 8 healthy volunteers was used ex vivo. Blood from the same donor was used for 6 hours of circulation in a miniature mock-loop system consisting of 2 identical extracorporeal circuits to compare the following experimental settings: (1) optimal revolutions per minute (rpm) for the HeartMate 3 (n = 4; 5000 rpm) and the EVAHEART (n = 4; 2500 rpm) and (2) equal rpm (3000 rpm for the HeartMate 3 and EVAHEART, n = 4 vs n = 4). For both settings, blood flow was adjusted to 1 mock-loop filling volume per minute (HeartMate 3 = 82 mL/min, EVAHEART = 100 mL/min). A panel of coagulation markers was analyzed to investigate hemostatic changes.
RESULTS: The free plasma hemoglobin concentration was significantly lower in the EVAHEART compared with the HeartMate 3 after 6 hours of mock-loop circulation under both settings (optimal: 37 ± 31 vs 503 ± 173 mg/dL, P < .0001; equal: 27 ± 4 vs 139 ± 135 mg/dL, P = .024). Loss of von Willebrand factor high-molecular-weight multimers occurred in both left ventricular assist devices and settings, but the von Willebrand factor:activity/von Willebrand factor:antigen ratio after 6 hours was significantly lower in optimal settings for the HeartMate 3 (P = .009). The thrombin-antithrombin complex level was significantly lower with the EVAHEART for both settings (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The EVAHEART left ventricular assist device caused less hemolysis, resulted in lower coagulation activation, and provided better preservation of von Willebrand factor functional activity compared with the HeartMate 3 device. These findings prove that left ventricular assist device design plays a major role in minimizing blood damage during left ventricular assist device support.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EVAHEART; HeartMate 3; Left ventricular assist device; circulatory mock-loop; haemolysis; hemocompatibility

Year:  2018        PMID: 30414772     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit.

Authors:  Patrick Borchers; Patrick Winnersbach; Sandra Kraemer; Christian Beckers; Eva Miriam Buhl; Steffen Leonhardt; Rolf Rossaint; Marian Walter; Thomas Breuer; Christian Bleilevens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Therapy for Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: More Data, More Questions.

Authors:  Gaurav Gulati; Michael S Kiernan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Validation of a Miniaturized Test Loop for the Assessment of Human Blood Damage by Continuous-Flow Left-Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Eva Woelke; Ilona Mager; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Ulrich Steinseifer; Johanna C Clauser
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.934

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.