Leo Luo1, John Cuaron2, Lior Braunstein2, Erin Gillespie2, Atif Kahn2, Beryl McCormick2, Dennis Mah3, Brian Chon3, Henry Tsai3, Simon Powell2, Oren Cahlon4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, United States. Electronic address: luol1@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, United States. 3. Procure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey 08873, United States. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, United States. Electronic address: cahlono@mskcc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy proton radiotherapy improves normal tissue sparing in comparison to photon-based approaches. Several studies have reported dosimetry comparison and tolerable acute toxicity profile with limited follow-up. We report our institutional experience of postmastectomy proton radiation including clinical efficacy and toxicities. METHODS: From December 2013 to February 2015, 42 consecutive patients who received mastectomy for non-metastatic breast cancer were treated with adjuvant chest wall and regional nodal proton therapy at a single proton center. 3D conformal uniform scanning with en face matching fields was used. RESULTS: The median follow-up among patients was 35 months (range 1-55 months). There was one local failure, zero regional nodal failure, and six distant failures. The 3-year rate of locoregional disease-free survival was 96.3%, metastasis-free survival was 84.1%, and overall survival was 97.2%. The only local failure event occurred on the chest wall within the radiation field, approximately 2.5 years after the completion of radiation. Skin dermatitis, fatigue, and esophagitis were the most common acute toxicity. All patients developed grade 1 or 2 acute skin toxicity and there was no grade 3 or 4 acute skin toxicity. Proton radiation is able to achieve excellent target coverage with median PTV V95 over 95% and heart sparing with median mean heart dose less than 1 Gy (RBE). CONCLUSION: With close to three years of median follow-up, post-mastectomy proton radiation has shown excellent locoregional control rates and favorable toxicity profile. Long-term adverse effect of heart-sparing radiation will require longer follow-up time and randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy proton radiotherapy improves normal tissue sparing in comparison to photon-based approaches. Several studies have reported dosimetry comparison and tolerable acute toxicity profile with limited follow-up. We report our institutional experience of postmastectomy proton radiation including clinical efficacy and toxicities. METHODS: From December 2013 to February 2015, 42 consecutive patients who received mastectomy for non-metastatic breast cancer were treated with adjuvant chest wall and regional nodal proton therapy at a single proton center. 3D conformal uniform scanning with en face matching fields was used. RESULTS: The median follow-up among patients was 35 months (range 1-55 months). There was one local failure, zero regional nodal failure, and six distant failures. The 3-year rate of locoregional disease-free survival was 96.3%, metastasis-free survival was 84.1%, and overall survival was 97.2%. The only local failure event occurred on the chest wall within the radiation field, approximately 2.5 years after the completion of radiation. Skin dermatitis, fatigue, and esophagitis were the most common acute toxicity. All patients developed grade 1 or 2 acute skin toxicity and there was no grade 3 or 4 acute skin toxicity. Proton radiation is able to achieve excellent target coverage with median PTV V95 over 95% and heart sparing with median mean heart dose less than 1 Gy (RBE). CONCLUSION: With close to three years of median follow-up, post-mastectomy proton radiation has shown excellent locoregional control rates and favorable toxicity profile. Long-term adverse effect of heart-sparing radiation will require longer follow-up time and randomized clinical trials.
Authors: Allison E Garda; Ashley E Hunzeker; Ann K Michel; Sayeh Fattahi; Satomi Shiraishi; Nicholas B Remmes; Heather L Schultz; W Scott Harmsen; Dean A Shumway; Elizabeth S Yan; Sean S Park; Robert W Mutter; Kimberly S Corbin Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-01-24
Authors: Prashant Gabani; Hetal Patel; Maria A Thomas; Beth Bottani; S Murty Goddu; William Straube; Julie A Margenthaler; Laura Ochoa; Jeff D Bradley; Imran Zoberi Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-10-02
Authors: Robert W Mutter; J Isabelle Choi; Rachel B Jimenez; Youlia M Kirova; Marcio Fagundes; Bruce G Haffty; Richard A Amos; Julie A Bradley; Peter Y Chen; Xuanfeng Ding; Antoinette M Carr; Leslie M Taylor; Mark Pankuch; Raymond B Mailhot Vega; Alice Y Ho; Petra Witt Nyström; Lisa A McGee; James J Urbanic; Oren Cahlon; John H Maduro; Shannon M MacDonald Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 8.013