Literature DB >> 30413929

Short-term outcomes after elective colon cancer surgery: an observational study from the Norwegian registry for gastrointestinal and HPB surgery, NoRGast.

L S Nymo1,2, S Norderval3,4, M T Eriksen5,6, H H Wasmuth7, H Kørner8,9, B A Bjørnbeth6,10, T Moger11, A Viste9,12, K Lassen4,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To describe the real burden of major complications after elective surgery for colon cancer in Norway, and to assess which predictors that are significantly associated with the short-term outcome.
METHODS: An observational, multi-centre analysis of prospectively registered colon resections registered into the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery, NoRGast, between January 2014 and December 2016. A propensity score-adjusted subgroup analysis for surgical access groups was attempted, with laparoscopic resections grouped as intention-to-treat.
RESULTS: Out of 1812 resections, 14.0% of patients experienced a major complication within 30 days following surgery. The over-all reoperation rate was 8.7%, and rate of reoperation for anastomotic leak was 3.8%. Twenty patients (1.1%) died within 30 days after surgery. Higher age was not a significant predictor of major complications, including 30-day mortality. After correction for all co-variables, open access surgery was associated with higher rates of major complications (OR 1.67 (CI 1.22-2.29), p = 0.002), higher 30-day mortality (OR 4.39 (CI 1.19-16.13) p = 0.026) and longer length-of-stay (HR 0.58 (CI 0.52-0.65) p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a low complication burden and high rate of uneventful patient journeys after elective surgery for colon cancer in Norway. Age was not associated with higher morbidity or mortality rates. Open access surgery was associated with an inferior short-term outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Elective surgery; Laparoscopy; Short-term outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30413929     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6575-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Taek-Gu Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Duck-Woo Kim; Samin Hong; Seung Chul Heo; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of the effect of postoperative in-hospital morbidity on long-term patient survival.

Authors:  P H Pucher; R Aggarwal; M Qurashi; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Randomized clinical trial of chewing gum after laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Authors:  N F Shum; H K Choi; J C K Mak; D C C Foo; W C Li; W L Law
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Giuseppe Giraudo; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Bodil Gessler; Olle Eriksson; Eva Angenete
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Compliance and outcomes of a multicenter study from the Spanish working group on ERAS.

Authors:  Santiago Gonzalez-Ayora; Carlos Pastor; Hector Guadalajara; Jose Manuel Ramirez; Pablo Royo; Elizabeth Redondo; Antonio Arroyo; Pedro Moya; Damian Garcia-Olmo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes.

Authors:  Masoud Babaei; Yesilda Balavarca; Lina Jansen; Adam Gondos; Valery Lemmens; Annika Sjövall; Tom Brge Johannesen; Michel Moreau; Liberale Gabriel; Ana Filipa Gonçalves; Maria José Bento; Tony van de Velde; Lana Raffaela Kempfer; Nikolaus Becker; Alexis Ulrich; Cornelia M Ulrich; Petra Schrotz-King; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?

Authors:  Michael P M de Neree Tot Babberich; Julia T van Groningen; Evelien Dekker; Theo Wiggers; Michel W J M Wouters; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Contemporary Practice, Evidence, and Knowledge Gaps.

Authors:  Jacob Ghotbi; Mushegh Sahakyan; Kjetil Søreide; Åsmund Avdem Fretland; Bård Røsok; Tore Tholfsen; Anne Waage; Bjørn Edwin; Knut Jørgen Labori; Sheraz Yaqub; Dyre Kleive
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Myrseth; Linn Såve Nymo; Petter Fosse Gjessing; Hartwig Kørner; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Stig Norderval
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.