| Literature DB >> 30413767 |
Williams E E Nabofa1, Oluwadamilola O Alashe2, Oyetunde T Oyeyemi3, Alfred F Attah4, Ademola A Oyagbemi5, Temidayo O Omobowale6, Adeolu A Adedapo7, Akinola R A Alada8.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI) is the most prevalent cause of cardiovascular death. A possible way of preventing MI maybe by dietary supplements. The present study was thus designed to ascertain the cardio-protective effect of a formulated curcumin and nisin based poly lactic acid nanoparticle (CurNisNp) on isoproterenol (ISO) induced MI in guinea pigs. Animals were pretreated for 7 days as follows; Groups A and B animals were given 0.5 mL/kg of normal saline, group C metoprolol (2 mg/kg), groups D and E CurNisNp 10 and 21 mg/kg respectively (n = 5). MI was induced on the 7th day in groups B-E animals. On the 9th day electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded, blood samples and tissue biopsies were collected for analyses. Toxicity studies on CurNisNp were carried out. MI induction caused atrial fibrillation which was prevented by pretreatment of metoprolol or CurNisNp. MI induction was also associated with increased expressions of cardiac troponin I (CTnI) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) which were significantly reduced in guinea pig's pretreated with metoprolol or CurNisNp (P < 0.05). The LC50 of CurNisNp was 3258.2 μg/mL. This study demonstrated that the formulated curcumin-nisin based nanoparticle confers a significant level of cardio-protection in the guinea pig and is nontoxic.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30413767 PMCID: PMC6226538 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35145-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Properties of CurNisNp (a) Size distribution of CurNisNp (b) Zeta potential distribution of CurNisNp.
Figure 2Effect of CurNisNp on hypertrophy index in MI induced guinea pigs. Note; data in bar chart are in Mean ± standard deviation. aP < 0.05 compared with group A; b+P < 0.01 compared with group B; b++P < 0.001 compared with group B.
Figure 3Histopathological changes of myocardial tissue (H&E); magnification ×400. (A) Control; (B) ISO alone; (C) ISO and metoprolol (D) ISO and CurNisNp (10 mg/kg) (E) ISO and CurNisNp (21 mg/kg). Group B showed myocardial cells necrosis, separation of cardiac myofibrillar and inflammatory cells infiltration due to ISO which were significantly reduced by pretreatment of metoprolol and CurNisNp respectively (Groups C–E).
Effect of pretreatment of CurNisNp on heart rate and ECG parameters in MI induced guinea pigs.
| HR (min) | P (ms) | PR int (ms) | QRS (ms) | QT int (ms) | QTc | R-amp (mV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 267.0 ± 7.8 | 25.0 ± 6.57 | 61.00 ± 2.56 | 32.33 ± 6.74 | 111.0 ± 21.03 | 234.0 ± 37.54 | 0.39 ± 0.12 |
| Group B | 237.0 ± 8.5a++ | 24.00 ± 7.00 | 52.50 ± 2.50a++ | 26.50 ± 1.50a | 156.5 ± 9.50a | 299.5 ± 5.50a | 1.27 ± 0.07a++ |
| Group C | 255.0 ± 10b+ | 26.00 ± 2.00 | 62.50 ± 2.50b++ | 30.50 ± 3.50b | 165.5 ± 6.50a | 327.0 ± 1.00 a | 0.45 ± 0.11b++ |
| Group D | 249.5 ± 4.5a,b | 22.50 ± 6.50 | 62.00 ± 1.00b++ | 27.00 ± 5.00 | 128.0 ± 12.0b | 260.5 ± 21.50b | 0.33 ± 0.07b++ |
| Group E | 253.5 ± 11.5b | 24.00 ± 3.00 | 61.00 ± 1.00b++ | 35.00 ± 5.00b+ | 132.5 ± 21.5b | 255.0 ± 28.00b | 0.66 ± 0.31b++ |
Note; HR, heart rate; P, PR, QRS and QT are durations on the ECG wave form; QTc, corrected QT interval; R-amp, R-wave amplitude. The results in the table above are in Mean ± standard deviation of each group of five guinea pigs. aP < 0.05 compared with group A; a++P < 0.001 compared with group A; bP < 0.05 compared with group B; b+P < 0.01 compared with group B; b++P < 0.001 compared with group B.
Figure 4Effect of pretreatment of CurNisNp on ECG pattern in MI induced guinea pigs.
Effect of pretreatment of CurNisNp on markers of oxidative stress in MI induced guinea pigs.
| Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Heart | 38.35 ± 2.29 | 41.73 ± 4.41a | 37.98 ± 1.61b | 36.54 ± 2.14b | 37.04 ± 2.27b |
| Kidney | 42.06 ± 7.48 | 60.48 ± 5.76a++ | 44.39 ± 6.48b++ | 43.25 ± 7.10b++ | 38.50 ± 2.71b++ |
|
| |||||
| Heart | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.78 ± 0.06a++ | 0.55 ± 0.03a+,b++ | 0.55 ± 0.03a+,b++ | 0.18 ± 0.01a++,b++ |
| Kidney | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.73 ± 0.19a | 0.71 ± 0.19a | 0.59 ± 0.10b | 0.74 ± 0.04a |
|
| |||||
| Heart | 56.68 ± 11.70 | 54.33 ± 6.87 | 60.14 ± 7.94 | 57.41 ± 9.34 | 53.01 ± 11.09 |
| Kidney | 41.46 ± 8.41 | 33.74 ± 3.69a | 34.64 ± 5.32a | 31.81 ± 3.41a | 48.71 ± 7.99b+ |
|
| |||||
| Heart | 8.43 ± 3.22 | 9.58 ± 1.64 | 12.82 ± 1.52a,b+ | 10.54 ± 2.48 | 15.93 ± 0.21a,b |
| Kidney | 20.74 ± 5.87 | 15.72 ± 1.36a | 31.20 ± 10.23a,b++ | 15.00 ± 4.53a | 21.51 ± 6.058b |
Note; results in the table above are in Mean ± standard deviation of each group of five guinea pigs. aP < 0.05 compared with group A; a+P < 0.01 compared with group A; a++P < 0.001 compared with group A; bP < 0.05 compared with group B; b+P < 0.01 compared with group B; b++P < 0.001 compared with group B.
Effect of pretreatment of CurNisNp on antioxidant systems in MI induced guinea pigs.
| Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | Group E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Heart | 7.59 ± 1.897 | 11.16 ± 1.17a | 14.36 ± 1.14a++,b+ | 13.25 ± 1.71a++,b | 16.32 ± 2.28a++,b++ |
| Kidney | 16.51 ± 1.67 | 13.75 ± 2.41a | 15.97 ± 1.06b | 17.61 ± 1.95b | 16.81 ± 0.79b |
|
| |||||
| Heart | 0.031 ± 0.01 | 0.015 ± 0.01a | 0.029 ± 0.003b | 0.03 ± 0.01b+ | 0.029 ± 0.01b |
| Kidney | 0.046 ± 0.01 | 0.023 ± 0.01a | 0.041 ± 0.005b | 0.042 ± 0.01b | 0.04 ± 0.01b |
|
| |||||
| Heart | 123.4 ± 3.82 | 119.1 ± 3.23a+ | 122.2 ± 2.57b | 129.0 ± 6.06a+,b++ | 123.7 ± 5.17b |
| Kidney | 194.1 ± 11.18 | 282.6 ± 33.53a++,b++ | 155.3 ± 15.47a++,b++ | 139.1 ± 9.72a++,b++ | 130.3 ± 5.35a++,b++ |
Note; results in the table above are in Mean ± standard deviation of each group of five guinea pigs. aP < 0.05 compared with group A; a+P < 0.01 compared with group A; a++P < 0.001 compared with group A; bP < 0.05 compared with group B; b+P < 0.01 compared with group B; b++P < 0.001 compared with group B.
Figure 5Immunohistochemical staining patterns of (a) cardiac troponin I (CnTI) in cardiac tissues, (b) Kidney Injury Molecule-1 in kidney tissues. (A) Control; (B) ISO alone; (C) ISO and metoprolol (D) ISO and CurNisNp (10 mg/kg) (E) ISO and CurNisNp (21 mg/kg). (F) Graphical representation of immunohistochemistry positive area. Intensity of staining is indicated with black arrows. Magnification ×100. aP < 0.05 compared with group A; a+P < 0.01 compared with group A; a++P < 0.001 compared with group A; b+P < 0.01 compared with group B; b++P < 0.001 compared with group B.
Percentage mortality of brine shrimp at different doses of CurNisNp.
| Test Material | % Mortality under the concentration studied (μg/mL) | LC50 (μg/mL) | 95%confidence Interval | Toxicity Profile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 100 | 500 | 1000 | ||||
| CurNisNp | 13 | 26 | 33 | 40 | 43 | 3258.2180 | 414.15–28705360.00 | Non-toxic |
| K2Cr2O7(positive control) | 20 | 47 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 8.9218 | 4.3953–16.1212 | toxic |
| Sea water (negative control) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Non-toxic |