| Literature DB >> 30413176 |
Santiago Hors-Fraile1,2, Shwetambara Malwade3, Dimitris Spachos4, Luis Fernandez-Luque5, Chien-Tien Su6, Wei-Li Jeng7, Shabbir Syed-Abdul8,9, Panagiotis Bamidis4, Yu-Chuan Jack Li3,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation is the most common preventative for an array of diseases, including lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although there are many efforts advocating for smoking cessation, smoking is still highly prevalent. For instance, in the USA in 2015, 50% of all smokers attempted to quit smoking, and only 5-7% of them succeeded - with slight deviation depending on external assistance. Previous studies show that computer-tailored messages which support smoking abstinence are effective. The combination of health recommender systems and behavioral-change theories is becoming increasingly popular in computer-tailoring. The objective of this study is to evaluate patients's smoking cessation rates by means of two randomized controlled trials using computer-tailored motivational messages. A group of 100 patients will be recruited in medical centers in Taiwan (50 patients in the intervention group, and 50 patients in the control group), and a group of 1000 patients will be recruited on-line (500 patients in the intervention group, and 500 patients in the control group). The collected data will be made available to the public in an open-source data portal.Entities:
Keywords: App; Behavioral change; Computer-tailoring; Health recommender systems; Messages; Mobile; Motivational; Smoking cessation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30413176 PMCID: PMC6230227 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-3000-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Description of the clinical and public pilot
| Name of the pilot | Number of patients | Groups | Treatment | Data to be assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical pilot (RCT; 100 patients) | 50 | Control | Usual care (behavioral therapy and pharmacological treatment) | Smoking cessation rate (clinically validated) |
| 50 | Intervention | Usual care + 3M4Chan app (advanced tailored messages) | Smoking cessation rate (clinically validated) | |
| Recommender system | ||||
| User engagement | ||||
| Physical activity | ||||
| Public pilot (RCT; 1000 patients) | 500 | Control | m-health (basic tailored messages) | Smoking cessation rate (self-reported) |
| Recommender system | ||||
| User engagement | ||||
| Physical activity | ||||
| 500 | Intervention | m-health (advanced tailored messages) | Smoking cessation rate (self-reported) | |
| Recommender system | ||||
| User engagement | ||||
| Physical activity |
RCT randomized controlled trial
Description of metrics to assess the primary and secondary outcome
| Metric | Calculation | Comparisons | Pilot | Related secondary outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome | ||||
| Smoking cessation rate | Total number of people who relapsed / total number of people in the group at 60 days, 120 days, and 180 days of their quitting date | • User engagement at an individual level | • Clinical | System influence on smoking cessation and app influence on users physical activity levels |
| Secondary outcomes | ||||
| User engagement at an individual level | Messages read by the user / total number of messages sent to the user | • Smoking cessation rate | • Public | System influence on smoking cessation |
| Engagement at an aggregated level | Mobile application rolling retention, session length distribution, session frequency, sessions per user, return rate | • Smoking cessation rate | • Public | System influence on. smoking cessation. |
| User quitting attempts | Number and date of quitting attempts | • Smoking cessation rate | • Public | System influence on smoking cessation |
| User app behavior | Time spent per app section | • User message ratings | • Public | App usage. and opinions on messages the users received |
| User satisfaction with messages | Satisfaction questionnaire | • User mobile app usage | • Clinical | App usage and opinions on messages the users received |
| User message ratings | Users’ votes for each message on a 5-star scale | • User app behavior | • Public | App usage and opinions on messages the users received |
| User lifestyle feedback | Comparison of changes in user lifestyle (at baseline and after 6 months) through the questionnaires: EQ-5D-5 L, IPAQ for physical activity, and SF-36 | • Smoking cessation rate | • Clinical | App influence on users physical activity levels |
| Physical activity | Total time (min) of activity per user, retrieved by GoogleFit | • Smoking cessation rate | • Public | App influence on users physical activity levels |
EQ-5D-5 L EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire, IPAQ International Physical Activity Questionnaire, SF-36 Short Form 36-item Health Survey
Description of additional metrics to be measured in the study
| Metric | Calculation | Pilot |
|---|---|---|
| User reliability | Comparison of the abstinence self-report at 2-week intervals with the measurements of the CO-oximeter | Clinical |
| QALY (financial aspects) | Healthcare resource utilization and cost analysis (cost of devices used, pharmacological treatment and time spent for various purposes) | Clinical |
| Precision of the recommender system | Messages sent and rated more than four stars / total number of rated messages | Public |
| Smoke-free period | Time range between quitting date and the last smoke-free report | Clinical |
CO carbon monoxide, QALY quality-adjusted life year
Fig. 1Difference of enrollment, intervention, and assessments periods in the clinical and public pilots
Fig. 2Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments
Fig. 3Screenshots of the app (English and Mandarin versions) showing different sections