| Literature DB >> 30413095 |
Haiyang Lv1, Rongfeng Zhou2, Lu Li3, Haitao Ni4, Jiang Zhu5, Tong Feng6.
Abstract
The effect of electric current pulse on the microstructure and corrosion resistance of hypereutectic high chromium cast iron was explored. The morphology of carbides in solidification microstructure was observed by an optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope and the composition was determined by an electron probe micro-analyzer. The microhardness of primary carbides and corrosion resistance of samples were also compared. Under the active of electric current pulse, the microstructure of hypereutectic high chromium cast iron was homogenized and its performance improved accordingly. On treatment by electric current, the morphology of primary carbides changed from thick long rods to hexagonal blocks or granular structures. The interlayer spacing of eutectic carbide decreased from ~26.3 μm to ~17.8 μm. Size statistics showed that the average diameter of primary carbide decreased from ~220 μm to ~60 μm. As a result, microhardness increased from 1412 HV to 1511 HV. No obvious microcrack propagation was found at the microindentation sites. The average length of microcracks decreased from ~20.7 μm to ~5.7 μm. Furthermore, corrosion resistance was remarkably enhanced. The average corrosion rate decreased from 2.65 mg/cm²·h to 1.74 mg/cm²·h after pulse current treatment.Entities:
Keywords: corrosion resistance; electric current pulse; high chromium cast iron; morphology; primary carbide
Year: 2018 PMID: 30413095 PMCID: PMC6266668 DOI: 10.3390/ma11112220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of hypereutectic high chromium cast iron (wt%).
| Element | C | Cr | Si | Mn | Ni | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 3.94 | 20.30 | 2.10 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 72.76 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of ECP treatment device (a) and process flow (b).
Figure 2Optical micrographs of solidification microstructure of hypereutectic HCCI with or without ECP treatment: (a) Non-ECP treatment; (b) ECP treatment.
Figure 3SEM microgrphs of Solidification microstructure of hypereutectic HCCI with or without ECP treatment: (a) Non-ECP treatment; (b) ECP treatment.
Figure 4Phase analysis of the primary carbides by EPMA and XRD. The EPMA location on the primary carbides in the (a) non-ECP sample and (b) ECP sample. (c) Typical XRD patterns of the non-ECP sample and ECP sample.
Composition of the primary carbides in hypereutectic high chromium cast iron.
| Element | C (at%) | Cr (at%) | Fe (at%) | C (wt%) | Cr (wt%) | Fe (wt%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| non-ECP sample | 31.27 | 40.22 | 28.51 | 7.17 | 52.44 | 40.39 |
| ECP sample | 30.39 | 38.03 | 31.58 | 7.45 | 49.63 | 42.92 |
Figure 5The cooling curve of HHCCI during solidification.
Figure 6The micro-indentation on the surface of primary carbides: (a) Non-ECP sample; (b) ECP sample.
Figure 7Relationship between weight and corroding time.
Figure 8Relationship between corrosion rate and corroding time.
Figure 9SEM microgrphs of the surface of samples and primary carbides: (a) surface of Non-ECP sample; (b) surface of ECP sample; (c) surface of non-ECP primary carbides; (d) surface of ECP primary carbides.