Literature DB >> 30411431

Predictive model algorithms identifying early and advanced stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer in claims data.

Daniel C Beachler1, Cynthia de Luise2, Ruihua Yin1, Kelsey Gangemi1, Philip T Cochetti1, Stephan Lanes1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Claims databases offer large populations for research, but lack clinical details. We aimed to develop predictive models to identify estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and human epidermal growth factor negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (ESBC) and advanced stage breast cancer (ASBC) in a claims database.
METHODS: Female breast cancer cases in Anthem's Cancer Care Quality Program served as the gold standard validation sample. Predictive models were developed from clinical knowledge and empirically from claims data using logistic and lasso regression. Model performance was assessed by classification rates and c-statistics. Models were applied to the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (claims) to identify cohorts of women with ER+/HER2- ESBC and ASBC.
RESULTS: The validation sample included 3184 women with ER+/HER2- ESBC and 1436 with ER+/HER2- ASBC. Predictive models for ER+/HER2- ESBC and ASBC included 25 and 20 factors, respectively. Models had robust discrimination in identifying cases (c-stat = 0.92 for ESBC and 0.95 for ASBC). Compared with a traditional a priori algorithm developed with clinical insight alone, the ER+/HER2- ASBC-predictive model had better positive predictive value (PPV) (0.91, 95% CI, 0.90-0.93, vs 0.69, 95% CI, 0.66-0.73) and sensitivity (0.54 vs 0.35). Models were applied to the claims database to identify cohorts of 33 001 and 3198 women with ER+/HER2- ESBC and ASBC.
CONCLUSION: We conducted a validation study and developed predictive models to identify in a claims database cohorts of women with ER+/HER2- ESBC and ASBC. The models identified large cohorts in the claims data that can be used to characterize indications in the evaluation of targeted therapies.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIRD; breast cancer; claims; lasso regression; molecular subtype; pharmacoepidemiology; predictive modeling; stage; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30411431     DOI: 10.1002/pds.4681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Structured Process to Identify Fit-For-Purpose Data: A Data Feasibility Assessment Framework.

Authors:  Nicolle M Gatto; Ulka B Campbell; Emily Rubinstein; Ashley Jaksa; Pattra Mattox; Jingping Mo; Robert F Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.903

2.  Real-world safety of palbociclib in breast cancer patients in the United States: a new user cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel C Beachler; Cynthia de Luise; Aziza Jamal-Allial; Ruihua Yin; Devon H Taylor; Ayako Suzuki; James H Lewis; James W Freston; Stephan Lanes
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paula Dhiman; Jie Ma; Constanza L Andaur Navarro; Benjamin Speich; Garrett Bullock; Johanna A A Damen; Lotty Hooft; Shona Kirtley; Richard D Riley; Ben Van Calster; Karel G M Moons; Gary S Collins
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Trial designs using real-world data: The changing landscape of the regulatory approval process.

Authors:  Elodie Baumfeld Andre; Robert Reynolds; Patrick Caubel; Laurent Azoulay; Nancy A Dreyer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  The emerging role of real-world data in advanced breast cancer therapy: Recommendations for collaborative decision-making.

Authors:  Paul Cottu; Scott David Ramsey; Oriol Solà-Morales; Patricia A Spears; Lockwood Taylor
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.