Literature DB >> 30411008

Cellulose Nanocrystal-ZnO Nanohybrids for Controlling Photocatalytic Activity and UV Protection in Cosmetic Formulation.

Fatima Awan1, Muhammad Shahidul Islam1, Yeyu Ma1, Cindy Yang1, Zengqian Shi1, Richard M Berry2, Kam C Tam1.   

Abstract

A high-performance semiconductor zinc oxide (ZnO) on melamine formaldehyde-coated cellulose nanocrystals (MFCNCs) was synthesized and evaluated for its application in smart cosmetics. These ZnO@MFCNC hybrid nanostructures were evaluated for their in vitro sun protection factor performance and photocatalytic activity under simulated UV and solar radiation. The photodegradation kinetics of a model pigment (methylene blue) was fitted to the Langmuir-Hinshelwood model. A 4-fold increase in the photocatalytic activity of ZnO@MFCNCs was observed when compared to pure ZnO. This is associated with (i) increased specific surface area provided by the MFCNC template, (ii) confined surface energy and controlled growth of ZnO nanoparticles, and (iii) entrapment of photoinduced charge carriers in the pores of the core-shell MFCNC rod, followed by fast promotion of interfacial e-charge transfer to the surface of the catalyst. The present study demonstrates how an increase in photocatalytic activity can be engineered without the introduction of structural defects or band gap tailoring of the semiconductor. The aqueous-based ZnO@MFCNC hybrid system displayed attractive UV-absorption and photocatalytic characteristics, offering the conversion of this renewable and sustainable technology into intelligent cosmetic formulations.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30411008      PMCID: PMC6217527          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Recent advances in the epitaxy of semiconductor materials have made it possible to fabricate metal oxide structures, where the confined electrons (e–) and holes (h+) could potentially be used to fine-tune the redox functionalities.[1,2] For solid-state systems, ZnO semiconductors with a wide band gap energy of 3.37 eV and with inherent UV-absorbing characteristics are promising materials because of their high quantum efficiency. They have found applications in optical devices, sensors, transparent electrodes, solar cells, photocatalysis, antibacterial activity, and cosmetics.[3−5] For these principal applications, the structural defects, morphology, size, surface area, and crystallinity are prime factors that determine the efficacy of the metal oxide. Research on these systems has focused on strategies to enhance the properties mainly through the introduction of oxygen vacancies, structural defects on the surface of the crystal, and widening the band gap of the metal oxide to limit the fast recombination of photogenerated charge carriers.[4] Doping with a variety of materials including both metal ions[6−8] and metal oxides[4,9−11] has shown that the band gap can be tailored and the range is promising for functional optoelectronic devices. However, in applications that require formulation in solution, the use of colloidal ZnO nanocrystals has encountered various challenges because of their tendency to aggregate through Ostwald ripening associated with their high surface energy.[3] As a result, these nanoparticles (NPs) are unstable during storage and their surface reactivity is reduced, which hinders their application in waste water treatment, photocatalysis, personal care, and biological systems. The possibility of using hybrid nanocomposites to fabricate functional systems in a simple aqueous solution process could overcome this issue and allow broader engineering application. One such hybrid that has the flexibility to meet these demands is a cellulose-based nanorod derived from wood pulp known as cellulose nanocrystal (CNC). The biocompatible 150 × 5 nm dimensional crystalline domains, extracted from wood fiber, are excellent substrates for the growth of semiconductor ZnO NPs. Large scale production of CNCs has been demonstrated by CelluForce Inc. in Montreal, Canada. The naturally uniform nanocrystal offers high specific surface area, long term stability in water, consistent dimensions, and high mechanical strength.[12] A comparison on the preparation methods, size, morphology, and application of reported CNC–ZnO nanocomposites is summarized in Table .
Table 1

Summary of Preparation Methods and Application of CNC–ZnO Nanohybrids

CNC sourcepreparation methodmorphologysizeapplicationrefs
commercial viscose acetal fibersprecipitationflower-like nanorod clusters2.56 μmantibacterial & photocatalytic(13)
microcrystalline celluloseprecipitationsphere-like structure143.1 nmantibacterial & photocatalytic(14)
microcrystalline cellulosehydrothermalsheet-like converted to flower-like structure210 nmantibacterial & UV-shielding(15)
oil palm empty fruit bunchesin situ solution casting techniqueirregular disc-like structure65 nmantibacterial & photocatalytic(16)
Whatman filter paperprecipitationhexagonal wurtzite structure19.3 nmantimicrobial(17)
MF coated CNCnanotemplate mediated controlled chelationleaf-likegrowth15.1 nmUV protection & photocatalyticpresent work
The present study is directed toward evaluating the combination of semiconductor ZnO with a biocompatible CNC template and the advantage it offers in controlling the size of NP for high performance smart cosmetic systems. We focus on the design and synthesis of an optimal and highly porous nanohybrid system for use as a UV filter and a photocatalytic agent for the degradation of dye pigments or organic pollutants. This nanostructure was developed using a melamine-formaldehyde (MF)-coated CNC template that provides a mesoporous and nitrogen-rich substrate for the chelated growth of ZnO NPs in aqueous solution, without the need of high temperature calcination, surfactants, or capping agents. First, the sun protection factor (SPF) of the ZnO@MFCNC was evaluated through spectrophotometric analysis, and the role of the template in controlling the size of ZnO NPs to enhance the SPF values was demonstrated. Second, the photocatalytic degradation of a model pigment (methylene blue) under UV and solar radiation was evaluated using a pseudo-first order Langmuir–Hinshelwood model and explained with the solid band theory. The ZnO@MFCNC hybrid produced a 4-fold increase in photocatalytic performance through (i) the increased surface area of the MFCNC matrix, (ii) the confined surface energy and growth of the ZnO NPs, and (iii) the fast promotion of interfacial charge transfer to the surface of the catalyst. This last effect is in part due to the mesoporous core–shell structure of the MFCNC that traps the photoinduced charge carriers and prevents e–/h+ recombination without the need for tailoring the band gap or using structural defects on the surface. A complete analysis and characterization of the system using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), zeta potential, UV–vis spectroscopy, and transmission electron spectroscopy (TEM) measurements validated the properties and performance of the ZnO nanohybrid system.

Results and Discussion

The FTIR spectra shown in Figure A offer some insight into the chemical functionalities of the nanocomposite, as well as the MFCNC and pure ZnO structure. Pure ZnO is normally recognized in the infrared (IR) spectrum by the characteristic Zn–O stretching vibration between 430 and 500 cm–1, and broad peaks in the range of 3800–3900 cm–1 attributed to adsorbed H2O molecules present on the lattice.[8] For comparison, the IR spectrum for the MFCNCZnO (Figure A) hybrid shows a distinct absorption at 428 cm–1 (Figure A, spectrum b), which confirms the presence of ZnO in the nanocomposite. Another noticeable peak at 813 cm–1 arises from the 1,3,5-triazine ring of melamine, which confirms the presence of MFCNC in the hybrid.[18] This FTIR spectrum was compared with that of MFCNC (Figure A, spectrum c), which shows the typical peaks at 814 and 1565 cm–1 arising from the 1,3,5-triazine ring in the melamine structure, the C–H bending vibration absorption of the methylene group at 1330 cm–1, and the characteristic bands at 1020 cm–1 assigned to the −CH2–O–CH2 or −CH2–OH ether linkage of the MF resin.[18] It should be noted that the ZnO stretching vibration at 430 cm–1 is absent from the pure MFCNC spectrum.
Figure 1

(A) FTIR spectra of ZnO, ZNO@MFCNC, and MFCNC measured between 4000 and 400 cm–1. (B) TGA measurements of ZnO, ZnO@MFCNC, and MFCNC obtained at a heating rate of 20 °C/min under air.

(A) FTIR spectra of ZnO, ZNO@MFCNC, and MFCNC measured between 4000 and 400 cm–1. (B) TGA measurements of ZnO, ZnO@MFCNC, and MFCNC obtained at a heating rate of 20 °C/min under air. Further support on the mass loading of active ZnO on the surface of MFCNCs was determined from TGA. On the basis of the weight loss profiles of the three TGA curves (illustrated in Figure B), the residual contents of ZnO, ZnO@MFCNC, and MFCNC determined at 700 °C were 96.42, 86.73, and 9.54%, respectively. From the analysis, the content of ZnO was calculated to be 88.85%, based on eq .where CMFCNC and CZnO are the mass ratios of MFCNC and ZnO, respectively. The degradation beyond 350 °C for the hybrid and MFCNCs was mainly attributed to the size and surface area of the MF coated on CNCs.[19] No net weight loss was observed in the TGA curve of pure ZnO, confirming the thermal stability of ZnO.[20] In Figure A, the diffraction peak in both the MFCNC and ZnO@MFNCNC spectra observed at 2θ = 18.5°, and t marked with (*) are from cellulose 1. XRD data confirmed that all of the samples produced (without any additional calcination) were crystalline and possessed phase transformations corresponding to bulk ZnO that matched the reported literature values.[21−23] The highest intensity peak of the (101) plane observed along with other smaller intensity peaks at 100, 002, 101, 102, 110, 103, 112, and 004 were indexed to the hexagonal wurtzite ZnO structure (Crystallography Open Database, COD 1011258). These diffraction patterns were then analyzed using the Debye–Scherrer (eq ) to determine the crystallite size of the ZnO NP presents in the nanohybridwhere D is the crystallite size in (nm) perpendicular to the crystal (hkl) plane, k is a constant equals to 0.94, λ is the wavelength of the incident X-ray radiation [Cu Kα (0.154 nm)], β is the integral breadth of the full width at half maximum (fwhm), (π/180) is the correction factor to convert β into radians, and θ is the scattering angle for the (hkl) plane. The size calculated for the pure ZnO crystal was 39.90 ± (1 nm), whereas the crystallite size of ZnO in the ZnO@MFCNC hybrid was 15.19 ± (1 nm). The estimated crystallite sizes of the two samples agree with the XRD patterns shown in Figure A because the larger crystal size that is linked to pure ZnO, is characteristically associated with more pronounced sharp intensity peaks, whereas the smaller and broader peaks that are observed for the ZnO@MFCNC spectrum are linked to a smaller crystal size.[22,23] Additionally, the presence of these crystal planes and intensity peaks confirmed the successful formation of ZnO NPs on the surface of MFCNCs.
Figure 2

(A) XRD patterns of MFCNCs, synthesized ZnO, and the ZnO@MFCNC nanohybrid. (B) Zeta potential measurements of the three systems in aqueous solutions as a function of acidic pH.

(A) XRD patterns of MFCNCs, synthesized ZnO, and the ZnO@MFCNC nanohybrid. (B) Zeta potential measurements of the three systems in aqueous solutions as a function of acidic pH. The stability of the NPs was evaluated from zeta potential measurements of the ZnO@MFCNC complex and the metal oxide aqueous suspensions as a function of pH. This method is ideal for assessing the colloidal stability of the dispersion through evaluating the surface charge of the NPs. For the targeted sunscreen application, it is important to have a dispersion that is stable under acidic conditions at the natural skin surface (pH of below 5).[24] Research studies have indicated that a pH of less than 5 is critical for maintaining the biophysical parameters and resident skin microflora on the epidermal surface.[24]Figure B shows a strong pH dependency of the three systems; MFCNC, ZnO@MFCNC, and ZnO based on the electrophoretic mobility in well-dispersed Millipore water. The presence of chemical groups such as ZnOH2+, ZnOH, and ZnO on the surface of the ZnO NP is highly pH dependent.[25] As such, a low positive charge of around +10 mV (between pH 3 and 5) observed for pure ZnO in acidic solution can be attributed to the partial transfer of protons (H+) from the acidic environment, leading to an unstable Zn(OH)2+ surface chemical composition.[25] In comparison, it is interesting to note that the ZnO@MFCNC hybrid yielded a strong positive charge (+35 mV) in acidic conditions with pH < 4.5 because of the protonation of amine groups and a triazine ring, revealing a strong (+) charge from nitrogen (N1) on the melamine structure.[26] With a nitrogen-rich polymer backbone covering the surface of CNC, there is a large positive charge, making the ZnO@MFCNC nanohybrid electrochemically stable in aqueous solution. Beyond the pKa constant for melamine in water (5.0),[26] the zeta potential decreased from +34.1 mV at pH 4 to +22 mV at pH 5, indicating the practical usage of the nanohybrid in the acidic condition (pH < 5). The morphology of the hybrid system and the form of ZnO NPs were characterized using TEM. Figure A,B show the increase in the diameter and slight darkening of CNCs when coated with MF as observed previously.[19,27] The ZnO@MFCNC hybrid exhibited a unique leaf-like growth of ZnO on the CNC rods, as shown in the inset of Figure C. Although the size of the MFCNCs remained unchanged, the average diameter of ZnO NPs on the surface of CNCs was less than 20–25 nm. In contrast, the ZnO particles synthesized without the MFCNC template displayed micron-sized clusters of particles (>200 nm), primarily because of the high interface energy of NPs that lead to the formation of aggregates in solution.[28]
Figure 3

TEM micrographs of (A) pristine CNCs; (B) MF coated CNCs; (C) leaf-like growth of ZnO NPs on the surface of MFCNCs; and (D) pure ZnO particles >100 nm.

TEM micrographs of (A) pristine CNCs; (B) MF coated CNCs; (C) leaf-like growth of ZnO NPs on the surface of MFCNCs; and (D) pure ZnO particles >100 nm.

SPF Measurements

The efficacy of a sunscreen was determined by a quantitative measurement of the SPF, which is a numerical-rating system that reflects the degree of protection provided by a sunscreen product. The SPF is based on the ratio of the least amount of UV energy (UVB) required to produce minimal erythema on sunscreen-protected skin over the amount of energy required to produce the same erythema on unprotected skin.[29,30] The solar spectrum is composed of UVA (320–400 nm) and UVB (290–320 nm) radiation, where UVA is primarily involved in penetrating the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin that damage the keratinocytes, which is known to cause skin cancer.[100,200] Although the effects of UVA sound dramatic, the risk of UVB exposure is approximately 1000× more erythemogenic compared to UVA, which can cause severe photo damage and sunburns because of the shorter UVB wavelength.[29] As such, the SPF is primarily a measure of protection against UVB. Here the photoprotection of the hybrid structure and pure ZnO aqueous solutions were determined based on an in vitro spectroscopic method to calculate the SPF values using the well-developed Mansur mathematical expression (eq )[31]where CF is the correction factor (10), EE(λ) is the erythemogenic effect and solar radiation intensity at wavelength I(λ), and Abs(λ) is UV spectrophotometric absorbance values at wavelength λ determined at every 5 nm increments. The values of EE × I were normalized constants determined by Sayre et al., 1979[32] as shown in Table .
Table 2

Normalized EE × I Values Corresponding to Wavelength (nm) for the Calculation of SPF[32]

wavelength (nm)EE × I
2900.0150
2950.0817
3000.2874
3050.3278
3100.1864
3150.0839
3200.0180
Figure shows the comparative SPF values of the ZnO@MFCNC nanohybrid and pure ZnO prepared from various hydroxide ratios. The results from the experimental studies demonstrated that ZnO deposited on the surface of the MFCNC substrate and the pure ZnO system displayed good SPF values of between 10 and 14 when the ratio of ([MFCNC]/[Zn2+])/[OH] ranged from 1:2 to 1:10. In cases where ZnO@MFCNC displayed a better SPF value than pure ZnO, it is likely to be related to the better dispersion stability of the ZnO@MFCNC system. The role of the MFCNC matrix is obvious from these results as it (i) contributes to an increased surface area because of the sponge-like porous matrix, (ii) offers the chelation of zinc ion (Zn2+) with enhanced affinity through the rich nitrogen groups of the MF resin,[33,34] and (iii) promotes the confined growth of the metal oxide in the mesopores of the MF resin leading to a controlled NP size that offers better UV absorption compared to pure micron-size ZnO.
Figure 4

Bar graph illustrating the comparative SPF values of aqueous ZnO@MFCNCs and pure ZnO solutions, with increasing [OH] ratios.

Bar graph illustrating the comparative SPF values of aqueous ZnO@MFCNCs and pure ZnO solutions, with increasing [OH] ratios. By systematically varying the ratio of MFCNC-Zn2+ to hydroxide, an optimal composition of [Zn2+]/[OH–] of 1:3 was observed. It is suggested that this optimal ratio for the measurement of SPF is directly related to the particle size and morphology, where the reduction in the particle size, from micro to nano, directly affects the SPF. From our observation, it is evident that for the hydroxide ratio of between 4 and 10, the reaction between the zinc ion and hydroxide proceeded rapidly, producing larger particles that were less stable, in contrast to the optimal ratio of 1:3. By further increasing the hydroxide ratio beyond 10, no ZnO crystal was produced, which was confirmed by the absence of the characteristic exciton energy peak of ZnO at 350 nm in the UV region, in addition to the disappearance of the cloudy aggregates.[35] The result demonstrated that the alkaline ratio controlled the ZnO particle formation after the initial nucleation on the MFCNC substrate.

UV Absorbance & Optical Properties

The formation of the ZnO crystal on the surface of MFCNCs was validated by the presence of the characteristic UV absorption peak at 350 nm for ZnO, in addition to the peak at 209 nm because of the triazine ring of MF.[36] The excited electronic states of semiconductor ZnO NPs with a direct band gap energy of 3.31 eV differ to a great degree from that of the bulk ZnO. This change causes a quantum confinement effect in ZnO NPs.[37,38] The widening of the band gap energy corresponds to a reduction in the NP size and is evidenced by an overall blue shift in the spectrum.[38] From the optical measurements of the ZnO@MFCNC nanohybrid structure, there was a visible blue shift detected in the wavelength from the bulk ZnO at 365 nm to the ZnO@MFCNC at 350 nm, as illustrated in the inset of Figure . The blue shift is a good indication of the relative reduction in the particle size compared to pure ZnO, and it confirmed the importance of a chelating template of the porous MFCNC in controlling the NP formation in aqueous solution.
Figure 5

UV–vis absorbance of the ZnO@MFCNC nanocomposite and unmodified pure ZnO.

UV–vis absorbance of the ZnO@MFCNC nanocomposite and unmodified pure ZnO.

Photocatalytic Evaluation under Solar Simulation and UV Radiation

The rate of degradation of methylene blue (MB), as determined by colorimetric measurements (Figure A,B), was used to assess the photocatalytic performance of the ZnO@MFCNC nanohybrid. A substantial enhancement over the bulk ZnO system was found with the ZnO@MFCNC system. The pseudo-first order linear kinetic rate analysis shown in Figure C was fitted to the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model (eq )where C is the concentration at irradiation time (t), C0 is the initial concentration at irradiation time 0, and k is the first-order rate constant. Linear regressions of the data presented in Figure C revealed a 4-fold increase in the kinetic rate for the ZnO@MFCNC system (0.0117 min–1) compared to ZnO (0.00314 min–1), and an even faster rate of 0.0387 min–1 was observed for the study under sunlight of the CNC-supported nanohybrid. The ZnO@MFCNC system showed a complete degradation under solar stimulation after 60 min, and 96.49% degradation under artificial UV light after 200 min, as illustrated in Figure D, whereas bulk ZnO displayed only half the degradation (51.14%) at 200 min, with complete degradation observed after 6 h. The kinetics under sunlight for the CNC-supported hybrid system indicated that the efficiency of dye degradation is better (0.0387 min–1) under sunlight in comparison to UV alone (0.0117 min–1), as shown in Figure . We postulate the faster kinetics to be primarily attributed to sunlight irradiation,[39,40] with both UV and visible incorporated activation of the MFCNC-supported catalyst. The faster kinetics can be defined by the UV + visible (sunlight intensity) over the 60 min interval, where first the light activates the surface of the catalyst, and progressively penetrates the porous MFCNC network and the ZnO catalyst. The results offer evidence that the hybrid system was activated by both the UV, as well as the visible region for photocatalytic degradation, making it advantageous for practical outdoor applications.
Figure 6

(A) UV–vis attenuation profile and absorption spectra of methylene blue (MB) photocatalytic degradation by ZnO@MFCNCs; (B) absorption spectra of the photocatalytic degradation of MB by pristine ZnO; (C) pseudo-first order kinetic rate plot of ZnO and ZnO@MFCNCs under sunlight and UV; (D) photocatalytic % degradation of ZnO and ZnO@MFCNCs under sunlight and UV as a function of the irradiation time (min).

(A) UV–vis attenuation profile and absorption spectra of methylene blue (MB) photocatalytic degradation by ZnO@MFCNCs; (B) absorption spectra of the photocatalytic degradation of MB by pristine ZnO; (C) pseudo-first order kinetic rate plot of ZnO and ZnO@MFCNCs under sunlight and UV; (D) photocatalytic % degradation of ZnO and ZnO@MFCNCs under sunlight and UV as a function of the irradiation time (min). These results were primarily associated with the molecular activity at the atomic level, followed by series of photocatalytic redox reactions at the surface of the semiconductor ZnO@MFCNC. The emphasis of the optical absorption in colloidal semiconductors is interestingly dissimilar from bulk materials.[11,41] The electronic conduction in a solid could be explained through the molecular orbital (MO) theory, where the MOs are treated as energy bands instead of discrete levels because of the small difference in energy.[38,41] As in the case of the solid semiconductor ZnO@MFCNC, electrons occupy the energy bands according to their energy. Upon UV excitation, the electrons in the highest occupied orbital of the valence band (VB) are promoted to the unoccupied orbital of the conduction band (CB) above it; leaving behind a hole (positive charge) in the VB.[41] The space between these energy bands is the band gap which acts as a barrier to electronic mobility. The e–/h+ formation dictates photocatalysis, where e–/h+ pairs migrate to the semiconductor surface and participate in a redox reaction with the adsorbed organic compound which in this case is methylene blue.[6,7,9,42] The migration rate increases when there is a widening of the band gap which occurs with a reduction in the particle size. The faster rate allows e– or h+ to react to a greater degree with surface-adsorbed species rather than recombine; thus, improving the catalytic efficiency.[28,40] Here, the role of the nanotemplate of the mesoporous MFCNC becomes important, as it confines the growth of ZnO because of the high specific surface provided by the MFCNC (212.8 m2 g–1),[19] where the surface area for ZnO NPs in the wurtzite phase is approximately 29.35 m2 g–1.[43] This phenomenon has three related consequences, namely; (1) it controls the NP growth, (2) it increases the specific surface area of the semiconductor ZnO, and (3) it effectively prevents e–/h+ recombination and increases the concentration of the photoinduced charge carriers at the surface of the catalyst, which has major implications for the photocatalytic performance of the structure. A schematic illustration of a proposed mechanism, with explanation of the redox reactions is described in Figure .
Figure 7

Proposed mechanism of degradation and schematic representation of semiconductor ZnO grown on the surface of MFCNCs.

Proposed mechanism of degradation and schematic representation of semiconductor ZnO grown on the surface of MFCNCs. With UV excitation energy exceeding the band gap, electrons (e–) are promoted from the ground state to the CB, resulting in vacancy (h+) in the VB. The e–/h+ formation dictates the photocatalytic activity of the semiconductor hybrid. The photogenerated h+ oxidizes the H2O molecules adsorbed on the surface of ZnO to OH. radicals. In the upper band, the excited e– of CB reacts with pre-adsorbed O2 molecules to form reactive oxygen species (ROS) (i.e. superoxide anion radicalO2–).[44] Given the high quantum yield of photogenerated holes, actual degradation of the dye can arise from direct transfer of photogenerated carriers or through the formation of ROS,[42] which complete the reaction by degrading any organic pollutants in primary contact. The photocatalytic activity of ZnO in altering the optical properties of dye pigments can be utilized to design smart cosmetic products, where the tone color of the cosmetic on skin can be tuned to fade as a function of exposure to sunlight. In addition, in countries where air pollution from organic debris is a significant concern, these photocatalysts can be actively utilized as a method to degrade the contaminants, making it an important aspect of the proposed system. Table shows a comparison of the kinetics for the photocatalytic performance of other ZnO-based systems reported in the literature for the degradation of organic pollutants. Our synthesized hybrid material demonstrates comparable rate constants for irradiation under UV and ameliorated values for the solar-radiated samples.
Table 3

Comparison of the Photocatalytic Performance of ZnO-Based Systems for the Degradation of Organic Pollutants

ZnO based photocatalytic systemsmodel pollutantrate constant (min–1) UVrate constant (min–1) sunlightrefs
Fe3+ doped ZnO calcined@400 °C2-CPnot studied0.0263(45)
Mn3O4 doped ZnO4-CPnot studied0.0133(46)
TiO2/ZnO chitosan complexMOnot studied0.0256(47)
Au–ZnO heterostructuresMB0.0210.0350(48)
ZnO chelated on mesoporous MFCNC matrixMB0.01170.0387present work

Experimental Methods

Materials

CNCs with dimensions 150 nm in length and 5 nm wide were supplied by Celluforce Inc. Quebec, Canada. All of the analytical grade chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received.

Synthesis of the ZnO@MFCNC Colloidal Nanohybrid

MF-coated CNCs (MFCNCs) were prepared via the poly-condensation of MF precursor on the CNC rod as described previously by Wu et al. 2016.[19] The optimal hybrid ratio was obtained by dispersing 143 mg of MFCNC in 15 mL of water. After which, 165 mg of zinc acetate dihydrate was dissolved in another 15 mL of water and added dropwise to the MFCNC solution and stirred at 5 °C for 1 h, where the positive zinc ions were chelated by the nitrogen groups of the MFCNC rods. Then, 30 mL of 0.0225 molar NaOH was introduced dropwise to hydrolyze the Zn2+@MFCNC solution, which was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The samples were exposed to hydrothermal treatment at 100 °C for 1 h, and purified through dialysis. The preparation of pure ZnO followed the same procedure but without the addition of MFCNC; 165 mg of zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn2+) was predissolved in 15 mL of water and reacted with 30 mL of 0.0225 molar NaOH at room temperature for 2 h. This was followed by hydrothermal treatment and purification. A schematic describing the synthesis procedure is illustrated in Figure .
Figure 8

Schematic illustration of the synthesis of semiconductor ZnO on the surface of MF-coated CNC rods.

Schematic illustration of the synthesis of semiconductor ZnO on the surface of MF-coated CNC rods. The absorption characteristics of the sunscreen agents were determined based on spectrophotometric analysis of dilute aqueous suspensions of ZnO@MFCNC and pure ZnO based on 5% active ingredient. Samples were diluted in water at a final concentration of 2 μL/mL and analyzed by UV spectrophotometry from 290 to 800 nm at 5 nm intervals using a 1 cm quartz cell according to Mansur’s method.[31] Water was used as a blank sample for the baseline correction. All of the tested materials were measured three times to obtain the standard error for the SPF measurements.

Photocatalytic Evaluation

UV: 50 mg of ZnO@MFCNC powder was mixed with 50 mL of 0.02 mg/mL methylene blue (MB) solution. The mixture was sonicated and vortexed to prepare a uniform dispersion of the hybrid powder, which was continuously stirred in the dark for 1 h to achieve an equilibrium absorption–desorption state. A Blak-Ray B-100AP-R High Intensity (100 W) 365 nm 2.5 A, 115V-60 Hz Lamp was used for UV irradiation of the samples. The solution was exposed to high-intensity UV irradiation, and 3 mL aliquots were withdrawn at 20 min intervals, diluted 10 times, and centrifuged for 10 min at 7000 rpm. The absorbance was recorded using an ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectrophotometer (Cary Bio 100) measured from 200 to 800 nm at 1 nm intervals. The reaction was continued for 240 min by which time the dye was completely degraded. A parallel study to compare the photocatalytic performance of pure ZnO using the same protocol was conducted for 360 min. Sunlight: identical reaction conditions were used for the evaluation on the effect of sunlight on the photocatalytic performance of ZnO@MFCNCs and pure ZnO, and 3 mL aliquots were withdrawn every 10 min for analysis. The experiments were conducted in direct sunlight, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm in late July and early August, where the average UV index was 8. The temperature of the reaction was monitored with a temperature probe, and the solutions were sealed to minimize the evaporation of the liquid.

Physical and Chemical Characterization

Optical, SPF, and photocatalytic measurements were monitored using an ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectrophotometer (Cary Bio 100). TGA was performed using a TGA Q600 from TA Instruments (New Castle, Delaware). The experiments were conducted at a heating rate of 20 °C/min in the presence of air, from 25 to 800 °C. The morphology of the uranyl-stained CNCs was obtained with a JEM-2100 high resolution transmission electron microscope. MFCNC, ZnO@MFCNC, and unmodified ZnO particles were characterized using a Philips CM10 transmission electron microscope. The XRD patterns of the samples were performed with a Rigaku D/MAX-RB diffractometer using filtered Cu Kα radiation. FTIR spectra were recorded using a PerkinElmer 1720 spectrophotometer of freeze-dried samples mixed with KBr, at a resolution of 4 cm–1, and analyzed using OPUS software. The zeta potentials of the solutions were measured as a function of pH from 3.0 to 5.0 every 0.5 units. This range was tested to check the stability of the system by measuring the surface charge of the NPs using Zetasizer Malvern Nano ZS90.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that surface-modified porous CNCs in aqueous solution can be used to control the growth of semiconductor ZnO nanocrystals. We have evaluated and characterized the surface active ZnO@MFCNC nanohybrid as an ultraviolet filter and a photocatalytic agent. The material has high UV absorption with an SPF value of 14 based on 5% active ingredient. It also provides a 4-fold increase in photocatalysis under UV and solar radiation. This work shows that the introduction of structural defects and the tailoring of the band gap are not the only means to enhance the photocatalytic activity of ZnO. It shows that greater activity can be engineered through the control of the size, geometry, and orientation of the semiconductor via the use of a porous template. The nanohybrid produced has several advantages: it confines the surface energy and growth of ZnO NPs, and it promotes interfacial e– charge transfer to the surface of the catalyst through entrapment of the photoinduced charge carriers in the pores of the MFCNC rod which in turn prevents the e–/h+ recombination. In summary, by combining the functionality of the N-rich mesoporous MFCNC with semiconductor ZnO, we have developed a nanostructure that may find application in the design of smart cosmetic products.
  18 in total

1.  Engineering light absorption in semiconductor nanowire devices.

Authors:  Linyou Cao; Justin S White; Joon-Shik Park; Jon A Schuller; Bruce M Clemens; Mark L Brongersma
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Construction of cellulose based ZnO nanocomposite films with antibacterial properties through one-step coagulation.

Authors:  Feiya Fu; Lingyan Li; Lianjie Liu; Jun Cai; Yaping Zhang; Jinping Zhou; Lina Zhang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  A comparison of in vivo and in vitro testing of sunscreening formulas.

Authors:  R M Sayre; P P Agin; G J LeVee; E Marlowe
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Mg-doped ZnO nanoparticles for efficient sunlight-driven photocatalysis.

Authors:  Vinodkumar Etacheri; Roshith Roshan; Vishwanathan Kumar
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Extraction of nanocellulose and in-situ casting of ZnO/cellulose nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Kebadiretse Lefatshe; Cosmas M Muiva; Lemme P Kebaabetswe
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 9.381

6.  Microencapsulated fragrances in melamine formaldehyde resins.

Authors:  Stéphane Bône; Claire Vautrin; Virginie Barbesant; Stéphane Truchon; Ian Harrison; Cédric Geffroy
Journal:  Chimia (Aarau)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.509

7.  Visible light photocatalytic activity of Fe(3+)-doped ZnO nanoparticle prepared via sol-gel technique.

Authors:  Muneer M Ba-Abbad; Abdul Amir H Kadhum; Abu Bakar Mohamad; Mohd S Takriff; Kamaruzzaman Sopian
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Generalized self-assembly of scalable two-dimensional transition metal oxide nanosheets.

Authors:  Ziqi Sun; Ting Liao; Yuhai Dou; Soo Min Hwang; Min-Sik Park; Lei Jiang; Jung Ho Kim; Shi Xue Dou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Enhanced photocatalytic performance of TiO2-ZnO hybrid nanostructures.

Authors:  Chun Cheng; Abbas Amini; Chao Zhu; Zuli Xu; Haisheng Song; Ning Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A feasible strategy to balance the crystallinity and specific surface area of metal oxide nanocrystals.

Authors:  Q P Zhang; X N Xu; Y T Liu; M Xu; S H Deng; Y Chen; H Yuan; F Yu; Y Huang; K Zhao; S Xu; G Xiong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Facile Use of ZnO Nanopowders to Protect Old Manual Paper Documents.

Authors:  Ludmila Motelica; Aurelian Popescu; Anca-Gabriela Răzvan; Ovidiu Oprea; Roxana-Doina Truşcă; Bogdan-Stefan Vasile; Florina Dumitru; Alina-Maria Holban
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Upcycling discarded cellulosic surgical masks into catalytically active freestanding materials.

Authors:  Javier Reguera; Fangyuan Zheng; Ahmed Esmail Shalan; Erlantz Lizundia
Journal:  Cellulose (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.123

3.  Green synthesis of cellulose nanocrystal/ZnO bio-nanocomposites exerting antibacterial activity and downregulating virulence toxigenic genes of food-poisoning bacteria.

Authors:  Ghada E Dawwam; Mona T Al-Shemy; Azza S El-Demerdash
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.