| Literature DB >> 30410565 |
Jie Wang1,2, Xu-Fang Liang1,2, Shan He1,2, Jiao Li1,2, Kang Huang1,2, Yan-Peng Zhang1,2, Dong Huang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies in teleost have demonstrated the adaptive strategy to maintain hepatic lipid homeostasis within certain limit. The excess of fat-intake could induce abnormal lipid deposition in liver but not adipose tissue. However, the molecular mechanism between the impaired lipid homeostasis and the aggravated lipid deposition in liver has not been elucidated well in fish.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese perch; Dietary fat; FAs β-oxidation; Gluconeogenesis; Hepatic steatosis; Lipid homeostasis; Lipogenesis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30410565 PMCID: PMC6211486 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-018-0315-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Compositions of diets added with different levels of lipid
| Experimental diets | L2 | L7 | L12 | L17 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (g kg− 1) | ||||
| Fish meal | 745 | 695 | 645 | 590 |
| Caseina | 11 | 48 | 85 | 126 |
| Fish oilb | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 |
| Soybean oilc | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 |
| Corn starchd | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Cellulose | 134 | 97 | 60 | 24 |
| Mineral mixe | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Vitamin mixf | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Carboxymethylcellulose sodium | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Total | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 |
| Proximate composition | ||||
| Dry matter (DM) (%) | 81.38 | 86.75 | 89.12 | 93.52 |
| Crude protein (% DM) | 47.58 | 47.52 | 47.55 | 47.51 |
| Crude lipid (% DM) | 2.32 | 7.72 | 12.44 | 17.15 |
| Carbohydrate (% DM) | 13.39 | 13.36 | 13.40 | 13.42 |
| Ash (% DM) | 17.48 | 18.13 | 15.77 | 15.44 |
| Gross energy (kJ g−1) | 1.23 | 1.41 | 1.59 | 1.77 |
aCrude protein and crude lipid content of casein was 84.4 and 0.6%, respectively
bFatty acids composition of fish oil (%): 14:0, 10.01; 16:0, 15.61, 16:1, 10.25; 18:0, 1.63; 18:1, 11.88; 18:2, 4.29; 18:3, 6.20; 20:0, 0.07; 20:4, 3.80; 20:5 (EPA), 19.10; 22:6 (DHA), 7.69; SFA, 27.32; UFA, 63.21; PUFA, 41.08; MUFA, 22.13
cFatty acids composition of soybean oil (%): 10:0, 0.01; 14:0, 0.03; 16:0, 12.04; 16:1, 0.07; 18:0, 1.81; 18:1-9c, 28.77; 18:1-9 t, 0.01; 18:2-9c12c, 55.57; 18:2-9t12t, 0.02; 20:0, 0.39; 20:1, 0.20; 20:2, 0.01; 22:0, 0.11; 23:0, 0.02; 24:0, 0.01; 24:1, 0.04; SFA, 14.69; UFA, 85.29; MUFA, 29.12; PUFA, 56.16
dCrude protein and crude lipid content of corn starch was 0.3 and 0.2%, respectively
eMineral premix (per kg of diet): MnSO4, 10 mg; MgSO4, 10 mg; KCl, 95 mg; NaCl, 165 mg; ZnSO4, 20 mg; KI, 1 mg; CuSO4,12.5 mg; FeSO4, 105 mg; Na2SeO3, 0.1 mg; Co, 1.5 mg
fVitamin premix (per kg of diet): vitamin A, 2000 IU; vitamin B1 (thiamin), 5 mg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin), 5 mg; vitamin B6,5 mg; vitamin B12, 0.025 mg; vitamin D3, 1200 IU; vitamin E 21 mg; vitamin K3 2.5 mg; folic acid, 1.3 mg; biotin, 0.05 mg; pantothenic acid calcium, 20 mg; inositol, 60 mg; ascorbic acid (35%), 110 mg; niacinamide, 25 mg
Primer sequences for the quantitative real-time qPCR
| Gene name | Sequence 5′-3′ | Tm (°C) | Product size (bp) | E-values (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CACCCTATGACAAGAGGAAGC | 59 | 100 | 102.9 |
| TGTGCCAGACGCCCAAG | ||||
|
| CTGAGTTTGTGAAGAGAGCGG | 57 | 170 | 100.3 |
| GTCCTTTGGGTCTGTGCGT | ||||
|
| CTCCCTCCTTTCTGTCGGCTC | 58 | 111 | 103.2 |
| TCATTTGCTGGCAGTCGTGG | ||||
|
| ATGGAAATCACCCCTGTAATCTT | 57 | 203 | 101.9 |
| CTTATCTGACTACGGAATGAATCG | ||||
|
| TATGCCCACTTACCCAAATGC | 58 | 129 | 102 |
| TGCCACCATACCAATCTCGTT | ||||
|
| ATGGTGTATTGGCTGGAGTCT | 57.5 | 139 | 102.8 |
| CTGTGTGGTAGGTTTTCCTTGAT | ||||
|
| GAATGCCACCTACTTCCTTGT | 57 | 166 | 98 |
| CCCCTCATACCTCCATAAACC | ||||
|
| GTCCCGTTCCAGATGC | 54 | 257 | 101 |
| CTGCCAGTTTCAGATAGTAGTCC | ||||
|
| TGTGGATGGCTTTTTGGGT | 58 | 342 | 101.5 |
| CAGAGTGAGTGGGCATTTTGAT | ||||
|
| TGAGCGACATTTCCACCATA | 57 | 267 | 95.8 |
| CACCAACCAACTACAACCCAT | ||||
|
| TTACCCCAATGGAGGCACTT | 58 | 277 | 98.8 |
| CGGACCTTGTTGATGTTGTAG | ||||
|
| CAACCCTGAAGACAAATCTAATA | 57.5 | 180 | 96.3 |
| CAATCAAATGAGCCTTTCTAACT |
Growth performance and feed utilization of Chinese perch
| Item | L2 | L7 | L12 | L17 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IW | 44.52 ± 0.04 | 44.31 ± 0.06 | 44.59 ± 0.12 | 44.73 ± 0.05 |
| FW | 56.07 ± 0.51a | 61.86 ± 0.21c | 65.03 ± 0.49d | 60.00 ± 0.39b |
| WG (%) | 25.93 ± 1.03a | 39.58 ± 0.66c | 45.84 ± 1.45d | 34.15 ± 0.66b |
| SGR (%) | 0.66 ± 0.02a | 0.95 ± 0.01c | 1.07 ± 0.03d | 0.84 ± 0.01b |
| FI (g fish−1) | 533.55 ± 32.45bc | 563.46 ± 20.32c | 585.94 ± 24.16c | 468.22 ± 17.80ab |
| PR (%) | 23.50 ± 0.41a | 36.15 ± 0.64c | 42.22 ± 0.26d | 26.49 ± 0.53b |
Values are means ± SEM of four replicates, and values within the same row with totally different letters in superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05). IW (g), initial weight; FW (g), final weight; Weight gain (WG, %) = 100 × (final weight – initial weight) / initial weight; Specific growth ratio (SGR, %) = 100 × (ln FW – ln IW) / time (days); FI (g fish− 1), food intake; PR (%) = (fish protein gain) × 100 / (protein intake)
Fig. 1Lipid distribution of different tissues in Chinese perch. a The crude lipid content of whole fish body. b Hepatic somatic index. c TG content in liver. d Mesenteric fat index. e Visceral somatic index. f TG content in visceral adipose tissue. g TG content in muscle. h TG content in blood. For A-H, Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values with totally different letters on columns statistically differ at P < 0.05 and values without letters on columns mean no difference (one factor ANOVA, Duncan’s post hoc test)
Serum lipid fractions of Chinese perch
| Item | L2 | L7 | L12 | L17 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLU | 1.99 ± 0.18a | 3.42 ± 0.49b | 4.68 ± 0.60c | 2.16 ± 0.11a |
| TC | 5.12 ± 0.39b | 5.24 ± 0.63b | 4.59 ± 0.40b | 7.75 ± 0.35a |
| HDL | 0.80 ± 0.04ab | 0.88 ± 0.05ab | 0.96 ± 0.09b | 1.21 + 0.05c |
| LDL | 0.71 ± 0.09b | 0.83 ± 0.10b | 0.69 ± 0.16b | 1.26 ± 0.07a |
Values are mean ± S.E.M of six replicates and values within the same row with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). GLU, glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, total triglyceride; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein
Fig. 2Histology analyses of liver section and determination of hepatocyte inflammation. a Hepatic tissue section (40× magnification) of Oil Red O staining of Chinese perch fed with 2, 7, 12 and 17% dietary lipid levels. b Hepatic tissue section (40× magnification) of hematoxylin and eosin staining of Chinese perch fed with 2, 7, 12 and 17% dietary lipid levels. c Oil Red O relative area. d Measurement of hepatic cell nuclei. e Blood aspartate aminotransferase. Lipid droplets appear red after staining Oil Red O, and the depth of color of the red stain and the amount of the lipid droplet were positively correlated with lipid content. The nuclei of hepatocyte appear blue and the vacuole present to be hyaline after staining hematoxylin and eosin, and the numbers of nuclei were negatively correlated with hepatic steatosis. Ld, lipid droplet; Nu, nuclei; Va, vacuole. For C and D, Values are means ± SEM (n = 3); for E, Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values with totally different letters on columns statistically differ at P < 0.05 (one factor ANOVA, Duncan’s post hoc test)
Fig. 3The mRNA expression of the genes in hepatic triglyceride metabolism of Chinese perch. a-b The relative mRNA levels of hl and lpl were related to the triglyceride hydrolysis and hepatic FAs transport. c The relative mRNA abundance of cpt1 was related to FAs β-oxidation. d The relative mRNA level of cs was related to the conversion from acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate into citrate. e The relative mRNA abundance of srebp1 was related to lipogenesis in liver. f-g The relative mRNA levels of accα and fas were related to FAs biosynthesis. h The relative mRNA abundance of apoe was related to triglyceride transport. i-k The relative mRNA levels of pc, pepck and g6pase were related to gluconeogenesis de novo. For A-K, Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). Values with totally different letters on columns statistically differ at P < 0.05 (one factor ANOVA, Duncan’s post hoc test)
Fig. 4Proposed model of lipid metabolic strategy in Chinese perch responding to appropriate fat-intake. L7 and L12 represent diets containing of 7 and 12% lipid content, which was the optimal range of lipid level for fish growth and utilization in the present study. In the liver, the elevated FFAs-uptake could trigger FAs β-oxidation and then inhibit the lipogenesis to maintain stabilization of TG pool. The Acetyl-CoA derived from FAs β-oxidation could participate in TCA cycle for providing energy. Indeed, the substrate-glycerol derived from dietary TG hydrolysis would participate in gluconeogenesis and then prevent TG from accumulating in the liver. In this model, the homeostasis of hepatic TG pool and serum glucose was through the cooperation of FAs β-oxidation and gluconeogenesis
Fig. 5Proposed model of hepatic TG deposition in Chinese perch responding to high-fat intake. L17 represents diets containing of 17% lipid content, which was not benefit for hepatic lipid utilization and metabolism in the present study. In the liver, excess dietary fat-intake could accelerate the esterification of FFAs with the absence of FAs β-oxidation. Indeed, the extra uptake of FFAs could provide the mass Acyl-CoA substrate for lipogenesis via the up-regulation of srebp1. The sharply increased lipogenesis could effectively inhibit gluconeogenesis and aggravate TG deposition in liver although a part of newly-synthesized TG had been delivered to peripheral tissues via VLDL in blood