BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ethnic disparities in stroke are well described, with a higher incidence of disability and increased mortality in Blacks versus Whites. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes between those ethnic groups after stroke endovascular therapy (ET). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the prospectively acquired Grady Endovascular Stroke Outcomes Registry between September 1, 2010 and September 30, 2015. Patients were dichotomized into two groups - Caucasians and African-Americans - and matched for age, pretreatment glucose level, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Baseline characteristics as well as procedural and outcome parameters were compared. RESULTS: Out of the 830 patients treated with ET, 308 pairs of patients (n = 616) underwent primary analysis. African-Americans were younger (p < 0.01), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p = 0.04), and had higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score values (p = 0.03) and shorter times to treatment (p = 0.01). Blacks more frequently had Medicaid coverage and less private insurance (29.6 vs. 11.4% and 41.5 vs. 60.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). The remaining baseline characteristics, including baseline NIHSS score and CT perfusion-derived ischemic core volumes, were well balanced. There were no differences in the overall distribution of 90-day modified Rankin scale scores (p = 0.28), rates of successful reperfusion (84.7 vs. 85.7%, p = 0.91), good outcomes (49.1 vs. 44%, p = 0.24), or parenchymal hematomas (6.5 vs. 6.8%, p = 1.00). Blacks had lower 90-day mortality rates (18 vs. 24.6%, p = 0.04) in univariate analysis, which persisted as a nonsignificant trend after adjustment for potential confounders (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.03, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Despite unique baseline characteristics, African-Americans treated with ET for large vessel occlusion strokes have similar outcomes as Caucasians. Greater availability of ET may diminish the ethnic/racial disparities in stroke outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ethnic disparities in stroke are well described, with a higher incidence of disability and increased mortality in Blacks versus Whites. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes between those ethnic groups after stroke endovascular therapy (ET). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the prospectively acquired Grady Endovascular Stroke Outcomes Registry between September 1, 2010 and September 30, 2015. Patients were dichotomized into two groups - Caucasians and African-Americans - and matched for age, pretreatment glucose level, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Baseline characteristics as well as procedural and outcome parameters were compared. RESULTS: Out of the 830 patients treated with ET, 308 pairs of patients (n = 616) underwent primary analysis. African-Americans were younger (p < 0.01), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p = 0.04), and had higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score values (p = 0.03) and shorter times to treatment (p = 0.01). Blacks more frequently had Medicaid coverage and less private insurance (29.6 vs. 11.4% and 41.5 vs. 60.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). The remaining baseline characteristics, including baseline NIHSS score and CT perfusion-derived ischemic core volumes, were well balanced. There were no differences in the overall distribution of 90-day modified Rankin scale scores (p = 0.28), rates of successful reperfusion (84.7 vs. 85.7%, p = 0.91), good outcomes (49.1 vs. 44%, p = 0.24), or parenchymal hematomas (6.5 vs. 6.8%, p = 1.00). Blacks had lower 90-day mortality rates (18 vs. 24.6%, p = 0.04) in univariate analysis, which persisted as a nonsignificant trend after adjustment for potential confounders (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.03, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Despite unique baseline characteristics, African-Americans treated with ET for large vessel occlusion strokes have similar outcomes as Caucasians. Greater availability of ET may diminish the ethnic/racial disparities in stroke outcomes.
Authors: David L Roth; Orla C Sheehan; Jin Huang; James D Rhodes; Suzanne E Judd; Meredith Kilgore; Brett Kissela; Janet Prvu Bettger; William E Haley Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Diogo C Haussen; Mehdi Bouslama; Jonathan A Grossberg; Aaron Anderson; Samir Belagage; Michael Frankel; Nicolas Bianchi; Leticia C Rebello; Raul G Nogueira Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hugh S Markus; Usman Khan; Jonathan Birns; Andrew Evans; Lalit Kalra; Anthony G Rudd; Charles D A Wolfe; Paula Jerrard-Dunne Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Brett Kissela; Alexander Schneider; Dawn Kleindorfer; Jane Khoury; Rosemary Miller; Kathleen Alwell; Daniel Woo; Jerzy Szaflarski; James Gebel; Charles Moomaw; Arthur Pancioli; Edward Jauch; Rakesh Shukla; Joseph Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Heidi Mochari-Greenberger; Ying Xian; Anne S Hellkamp; Phillip J Schulte; Deepak L Bhatt; Gregg C Fonarow; Jeffrey L Saver; Mathew J Reeves; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Stephanie G Thompson; P Alan Barber; John H Gommans; Dominique A Cadilhac; Alan Davis; John N Fink; Matire Harwood; William Levack; Harry McNaughton; Valery L Feigin; Virginia Abernethy; Jackie Girvan; Hayley Denison; Marine Corbin; Andrew Wilson; Jeroen Douwes; Annemarei Ranta Journal: Lancet Reg Health West Pac Date: 2022-01-03
Authors: Sushanth Rao Aroor; Kaiz S Asif; Jennifer Potter-Vig; Arun Sharma; Bijoy K Menon; Violiza Inoa; Cynthia B Zevallos; Jose G Romano; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Larry B Goldstein; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: J Stroke Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 6.967