Amanda Walch1, Philip Loring2, Rhonda Johnson3, Melissa Tholl1, Andrea Bersamin4. 1. Dietetics and Nutrition Department, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK. 2. Department of Geography, Environment, and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Health Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK. 4. Center for Alaska Native Health Research and Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK. Electronic address: abersamin@alaska.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify practices, attitudes, and beliefs associated with intake of traditional foods among Alaska Native women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study that measured traditional food intake; participation in food-sharing networks; presence of a hunter or fisherman in the home; the preference, healthfulness, and economic value of traditional foods; and financial barriers to obtaining these foods. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 71 low-income Alaska Native women receiving Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) assistance in Anchorage, AK. ANALYSIS: Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Traditional foods contributed 4% of total daily calories. Given a choice, 63% of participants indicated that they would prefer half or more of the foods they ate to be traditional (ie, not store-bought). The majority of participants (64%) believed that traditional foods were healthier than store-bought foods. Of all participants, 72% relied on food-sharing networks for traditional foods; only 21% acquired traditional foods themselves. Participants who ate more traditional foods preferred traditional foods (B = .011 P = .02). IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE: Traditional food intake was low and findings suggested that Alaska Native women living in an urban setting prefer to consume more but are unable to do so. Future research might examine the effect of enhancing social networks and implementing policies that support traditional food intake.
OBJECTIVE: To identify practices, attitudes, and beliefs associated with intake of traditional foods among Alaska Native women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study that measured traditional food intake; participation in food-sharing networks; presence of a hunter or fisherman in the home; the preference, healthfulness, and economic value of traditional foods; and financial barriers to obtaining these foods. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 71 low-income Alaska Native women receiving Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) assistance in Anchorage, AK. ANALYSIS: Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Traditional foods contributed 4% of total daily calories. Given a choice, 63% of participants indicated that they would prefer half or more of the foods they ate to be traditional (ie, not store-bought). The majority of participants (64%) believed that traditional foods were healthier than store-bought foods. Of all participants, 72% relied on food-sharing networks for traditional foods; only 21% acquired traditional foods themselves. Participants who ate more traditional foods preferred traditional foods (B = .011 P = .02). IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE: Traditional food intake was low and findings suggested that Alaska Native women living in an urban setting prefer to consume more but are unable to do so. Future research might examine the effect of enhancing social networks and implementing policies that support traditional food intake.
Authors: Jacopo A Baggio; Shauna B BurnSilver; Alex Arenas; James S Magdanz; Gary P Kofinas; Manlio De Domenico Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Elizabeth D Nobmann; Rafael Ponce; Claudia Mattil; Richard Devereux; Bennett Dyke; Sven O E Ebbesson; Sandra Laston; Jean MacCluer; David Robbins; Terry Romenesko; Giacomo Ruotolo; Charlotte R Wenger; Barbara V Howard Journal: J Nutr Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Diane M O'Brien; Alan R Kristal; Sarah H Nash; Scarlett E Hopkins; Bret R Luick; Kimber L Stanhope; Peter J Havel; Bert B Boyer Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kyungcheol Choy; Sarah H Nash; Courtney Hill; Andrea Bersamin; Scarlett E Hopkins; Bert B Boyer; Diane M O'Brien Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Diana G Redwood; Gretchen M Day; Julie A Beans; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Sarah H Nash; Barbara V Howard; Jason G Umans; Kathryn R Koller Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2019-10-09
Authors: Julia McCartan; Emma van Burgel; Isobelle McArthur; Sharni Testa; Elisabeth Thurn; Sarah Funston; Angel Kho; Emma McMahon; Julie Brimblecombe Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2020-11-24