Nicolas Gatimel1, Jessika Moreau2, François Isus2, Nathalie Moinard2, Jean Parinaud2, Roger D Leandri2. 1. Service de Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU Toulouse, 330 avenue de Grande Bretagne, Toulouse 31059, France; Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse-III, Groupe de Recherche en Fertilité Humaine (EA 31694, Human Fertility Research Group), 330 avenue de Grande Bretagne, Toulouse 31059, France. Electronic address: gatimel.n@chu-toulouse.fr. 2. Service de Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Paule de Viguier, CHU Toulouse, 330 avenue de Grande Bretagne, Toulouse 31059, France; Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse-III, Groupe de Recherche en Fertilité Humaine (EA 31694, Human Fertility Research Group), 330 avenue de Grande Bretagne, Toulouse 31059, France.
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION: Anti-sperm antibodies (ASA) have been shown to reduce male fertility but consensus about the precise situations in which tests should be carried out are lacking. In infertility investigations, should the mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) test be a first-line test? Should it be carried out systematically before assisted reproductive technology (ART)? What are the risk factors for ASA? DESIGN: All infertile patients (n = 1364) were tested with SpermMar (modified MAR test) between July 2013 and June 2017. Intra-patient variability of the MAR test was also assesed by comparing two tests within the same year in selected patients (n = 101). RESULTS: The main factor that influenced the percentage of ASA was the presence or absence of sperm agglutination. In the presence of agglutinations, 27 out of 72 (37.5%) patients were positive for ASA compared with 33 out of 1292 (2.6%) in the absence of agglutinations (P < 0.0001). When one risk factor was present (spontaneous sperm agglutination, history of scrotal trauma or inguinal surgery), 33 out of 179 (18.44%) tests were positive for ASA (≥50% coated spermatozoa), whereas only 27 out of 1242 (2.2%) were positive when no risk factor was present (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ASA detection should not be systematically recommended in investigations of fertility status and before ART but reserved for when sperm agglutination is found during conventional sperm examination, or if the patient has a history of scrotal trauma or has undergone inguinal surgery.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Anti-sperm antibodies (ASA) have been shown to reduce male fertility but consensus about the precise situations in which tests should be carried out are lacking. In infertility investigations, should the mixed antiglobulin reaction (MAR) test be a first-line test? Should it be carried out systematically before assisted reproductive technology (ART)? What are the risk factors for ASA? DESIGN: All infertilepatients (n = 1364) were tested with SpermMar (modified MAR test) between July 2013 and June 2017. Intra-patient variability of the MAR test was also assesed by comparing two tests within the same year in selected patients (n = 101). RESULTS: The main factor that influenced the percentage of ASA was the presence or absence of sperm agglutination. In the presence of agglutinations, 27 out of 72 (37.5%) patients were positive for ASA compared with 33 out of 1292 (2.6%) in the absence of agglutinations (P < 0.0001). When one risk factor was present (spontaneous sperm agglutination, history of scrotal trauma or inguinal surgery), 33 out of 179 (18.44%) tests were positive for ASA (≥50% coated spermatozoa), whereas only 27 out of 1242 (2.2%) were positive when no risk factor was present (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:ASA detection should not be systematically recommended in investigations of fertility status and before ART but reserved for when sperm agglutination is found during conventional sperm examination, or if the patient has a history of scrotal trauma or has undergone inguinal surgery.
Authors: Valeriy A Chereshnev; Svetlana V Pichugova; Yakov B Beikin; Margarita V Chereshneva; Angelina I Iukhta; Yuri I Stroev; Leonid P Churilov Journal: Pathophysiology Date: 2021-10-15