| Literature DB >> 30409226 |
Cristina Garcia-Vaquero1, Cristina Mir2, Domingo Graterol1, Nuria Ortiz1, Maria Isabel Rochera-Villach1, Matilde E LLeonart3, Juan Lorente4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although considerable progress has been made in the last 30 years in the treatment of cleft palate (CP), a multidisciplinary approach combining examinations by a paediatrician, maxillofacial surgeon, otolaryngologist and speech and language pathologist followed by surgical operation is still required. In this work, we performed an observational cross-sectional study to determine whether the CP grade or number of ventilation tubes received was associated with tympanic membrane abnormalities, hearing loss or speech outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Audiometry; Cleft palate; Hearing loss; Otology
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30409226 PMCID: PMC6225714 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1312-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Fig. 1Otoscopic evaluation and cleft palate type. a Otoscopy results of 121 individuals (57 female, 64 male) with an age range of 6–31 years. b Distribution of patients based on the Veau classification
Association between the number of ventilation tubes and type of cleft palate (p = 0.820)
| Number of ventilation tubes | Type of cleft palate | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||
| 0 | 7 (70%) | 15 (65.22%) | 35 (52.24%) | 10 (47.62%) | 67 (55.37%) |
| 1 | 3 (30%) | 5 (21.74%) | 18 (26.87%) | 9 (42.86%) | 35 (28.93%) |
| 2 | 0 (0%) | 3 (13.04%) | 11 (16.42%) | 2 (9.52%) | 16 (13.22%) |
| 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.99%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.65%) |
| 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.49%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.83%) |
| Total | 10 (8.26%) | 23 (19.01%) | 67 (55.37%) | 21 (17.36%) | 121 (100%) |
Fig. 2Audiometric measurement of hearing loss in cleft palate (CP) patients. a Audiometric analyses were performed to measure hearing loss (%). Data were correlated with the grade of identified CP patients (p = 0.616). b Middle ear impedance was measured (%) and tympanogram type is represented in relation to the CP type (p = 0.800)
Association between chronic otitis media (COM) and the type of cleft palate. Here, 121 individuals categorized as COM positive and COM negative were examined based on the grade (from I to IV) of cleft palate (p = 0.505)
| COMa | Type of cleft palate | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||
| YES | 5 (50%) | 11 (47.83%) | 40 (59.70%) | 9 (42.86%) | 65 (53.72%) |
| NO | 5 (50%) | 12 (52.17%) | 27 (40.30%) | 12 (57.14%) | 56 (46.28%) |
| Total | 10 (8.26%) | 23 (19.01%) | 67 (55.37%) | 21 (17,36%) | 121 (100%) |
aCOM chronic otitis media
Association between chronic otitis media and the number of ventilation tubes inserted (p = 0.000)
| COMa | Number of ventilation tubes | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||
| YES | 21 (31.34%) | 27 (77.14%) | 14 (87.50%) | 2 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 65 (53.72%) |
| NO | 46 (68.66%) | 8 (22.86%) | 2 (12.50%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 56 (46.28%) |
| Total | 67 (55.37%) | 35 (28.93%) | 16 (13.22%) | 2 (1.65%) | 1 (0.83%) | 121 (100%) |
aCOM chronic otitis media
Association between chronic otitis media (COM) and hearing loss (p = 0.000)
| COMa | Degree of hearing loss | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Mild | Moderate | Severe | ||
| YES | 5 (17.24%) | 39 (60%) | 18 (78.26%) | 3 (75%) | 65 (53.72%) |
| NO | 24 (82.76%) | 26 (40%) | 5 (21.74%) | 1 (25%) | 56 (46.28%) |
| Total | 29 (23.97%) | 65 (53.72%) | 23 (19.01%) | 4 (3.31%) | 121 (100%) |
aCOM chronic otitis media
Multivariate analysis showing the association among the grade of cleft palate, age, number of ventilation tubes inserted, hearing loss (independent variables) and chronic otitis media (COM) (dependent variable)
| Variable | ORa | 95% CIa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of cleft palate | I | 1 | 0.9690 | |
| II | 0.73 | (0.11; 5.01) | ||
| III | 1.02 | (0.19; 5.34) | ||
| IV | 0.90 | (0.13; 6.33) | ||
| Age | 0.92 | (0.84; 1.01) | 0.0958 | |
| Number of ventilation tubes inserted | 8.42 | (3.40; 20.89) | 0.0000 | |
| Hearing loss | Normal | 1 | 0.0013 | |
| Mild | 9.88 | (2.37; 41.20) | ||
| Moderate | 32.83 | (5.61; 191.97) | ||
| Severe | 15.85 | (0.66; 379.68) | ||
aOR Odds Ratio, CI confidence interval
Association between hypernasality and the cleft palate grade (p = 0.053)
| Nasality | Type of cleft palate | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||
| 0 | 4 (40%) | 3 (13.04%) | 5 (7.46%) | 3 (14.29%) | 15 (12.4%) |
| 1 | 5 (50%) | 14 (60.87%) | 40 (59.7%) | 8 (38.1%) | 67 (55.37%) |
| 2 | 1 (10%) | 6 (26.09%) | 22 (32.84%) | 10 (47.62%) | 39 (32.23%) |
| Total | 10 (8.26%) | 23 (19.01%) | 67 (55.37%) | 21 (17.36%) | 121 (100%) |