Literature DB >> 3040800

Impact of cell culture sensitivity and virus concentration on rapid detection of herpes simplex virus by cytopathic effects and immunoperoxidase staining.

L S Zhao, M L Landry, E S Balkovic, G D Hsiung.   

Abstract

Tremendous interest has been generated in the commercial kits now available that incorporate herpes simplex virus isolation in cell culture with immunoperoxidase staining for viral antigen detection. Most studies comparing commercial kits with conventional cell culture techniques have found the kits to be less sensitive. However, different cell cultures were used for the two methods. In this study, mink lung, rabbit kidney, MRC-5, and Vero cells were compared for reisolation of herpes simplex virus from clinical specimens in which viral infectivity titers were concurrently determined. When specimens contained high titers of infectious virus, the cell system used made little difference and all specimens were detected by immunoperoxidase staining at 48 h postinoculation. However, when specimens contained low concentrations of virus, the differences in sensitivity between cell systems became apparent in rapidity of detection and overall isolation rate. Mink lung and rabbit kidney cells were both more sensitive than MRC-5 cells; Vero cells were significantly less sensitive than the other cells tested. The application of immunoperoxidase staining shortened the time to virus detection and lessened, but did not eliminate, the differences between the cell systems. Cytopathic effects alone in the most sensitive cell system equaled or exceeded immunoperoxidase staining applied in less-sensitive cell cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3040800      PMCID: PMC269234          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1401-1405.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Comparison of Cultureset and primary rabbit kidney cell culture for the detection of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  S J Rubin; S Rogers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of Cultureset and Bartels Immunodiagnostics with conventional tissue culture for isolation and identification of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  D L Sewell; S A Horn; P W Dilbeck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of guinea pig embryo cells, rabbit kidney cells, and human embryonic lung fibroblast cell strains for isolation of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  M L Landry; D R Mayo; G D Hsiung
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens with human embryonic lung fibroblast and primary rabbit kidney cell cultures.

Authors:  D R Callihan; M A Menegus
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of the Immulok cultureset kit and virus isolation for detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens.

Authors:  F G Hayden; A S Sorensen; J A Bateman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of cultureset to a conventional tissue culture-fluorescent-antibody technique for isolation and identification of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  S L Fayram; S Aarnaes; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of human fibroblast cells and primary rabbit kidney cells for isolation of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  D F Moore
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  More rapid isolation of herpes simplex virus in a continuous line of mink lung cells than in Vero or human fibroblast cells.

Authors:  V C Salmon; L R Stanberry; J C Overall
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Comparison of viral isolation, direct immunofluorescence, and indirect immunoperoxidase techniques for detection of genital herpes simplex virus infection.

Authors:  R C Moseley; L Corey; D Benjamin; C Winter; M L Remington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of a visual, rapid, membrane enzyme immunoassay for the detection of herpes simplex virus antigen.

Authors:  S J Zimmerman; E Moses; N Sofat; W R Bartholomew; D Amsterdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid isolation of herpes simplex virus by using mink lung and rhabdomyosarcoma cell cultures.

Authors:  S L Johnston; K Wellens; C S Siegel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Amplification techniques for detection of herpes simplex virus in neonatal and maternal genital specimens obtained at delivery.

Authors:  A L Warford; J W Chung; A E Drill; E Steinberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Continuous high-speed rolling versus centrifugation for detection of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  J H Hughes; V V Hamparian; C T Mavromoustakis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of herpes simplex virus by 8 h in shell vial cultures with primary rabbit kidney cells.

Authors:  P Tse; S L Aarnaes; L M de la Maza; E M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Biographical Feature: Marie-Louise Landry, M.D.

Authors:  Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of diploid fibroblast and rabbit kidney tissue cultures and a diploid fibroblast microtiter plate system for the isolation of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  A Langenberg; R Zbanyszek; J Dragavon; R Ashley; L Corey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA from genital lesions by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  A Langenberg; D Smith; C L Brakel; M Pollice; M Remington; C Winter; A Dunne; L Corey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Conventional tube cell culture compared with centrifugal inoculation of MRC-5 cells and staining with monoclonal antibodies for detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens.

Authors:  G L Woods; R D Mills
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Herpes simplex virus type 1 is the leading cause of genital herpes in New Brunswick.

Authors:  Richard Garceau; Danielle Leblanc; Louise Thibault; Gabriel Girouard; Manon Mallet
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.