Literature DB >> 3040798

Comparison of methods for detection of serum antibody to murine rotavirus.

W T Ferner, R L Miskuff, R H Yolken, S L Vonderfecht.   

Abstract

Mice are frequently used as animal models for the study of rotaviral infections. Since natural infection is common in laboratory mice, it is important that rotaviral studies, as well as other studies utilizing suckling mice, employ animals of known immune status to murine rotavirus. A variety of homologous and heterologous enzyme immunoassay systems and an immunofluorescence technique were thus compared to determine the immunoassay that is most effective at detecting adult mice seropositive for rotaviral antibody. It was determined that a homologous enzyme immunoassay inhibition technique utilizing murine rotavirus-derived reagents was the most efficient serologic assay evaluated. A serologic response was consistently detected by this assay by 5 days after experimental rotaviral inoculation of adult mice. A homologous antibody-binding enzyme immunoassay, a heterologous inhibition enzyme immunoassay utilizing antigenically related simian rotavirus (SA-11) reagents, and an immunofluorescence technique utilizing Nebraska calf diarrhea virus antigens were found to be less sensitive for detecting serum antibody to murine rotavirus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3040798      PMCID: PMC269225          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1364-1369.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Epidemiology of human rotavirus Types 1 and 2 as studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  R H Yolken; R G Wyatt; G Zissis; C D Brandt; W J Rodriguez; H W Kim; R H Parrott; J J Urrutia; L Mata; H B Greenberg; A Z Kapikian; R M Chanock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for identification of rotaviruses from different animal species.

Authors:  R H Yolken; B Barbour; R G Wyatt; A R Kalica; A Z Kapikian; R M Chanock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Rotaviruses.

Authors:  M S McNulty
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 3.891

4.  Age-dependent rotavirus-enterocyte interactions.

Authors:  M Riepenhoff-Talty; P C Lee; P J Carmody; H J Barrett; P L Ogra
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1982-06

Review 5.  Rotaviruses: a review.

Authors:  M K Estes; E L Palmer; J F Obijeski
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Pathogenesis of rotavirus infection in mice.

Authors:  L M Little; J A Shadduck
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Detection of anti-rotavirus antibody-producing cells in paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Authors:  S L Vonderfecht; B I Osburn
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Sequential passages of human rotavirus in MA-104 cells.

Authors:  T Urasawa; S Urasawa; K Taniguchi
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.955

9.  Susceptibility of mice to rotavirus infection: effects of age and administration of corticosteroids.

Authors:  J L Wolf; G Cukor; N R Blacklow; R Dambrauskas; J S Trier
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  The rotaviruses.

Authors:  T H Flewett; G N Woode
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.