Literature DB >> 30407954

Positive Airway Pressure Versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Prevention of Extubation Failure in Infants After Congenital Heart Surgery.

Robert P Richter1, Jeffrey A Alten2, R Wilson King3, Asaf D Gans4, Akm Fazlur Rahman5, Yuvraj Kalra6, Santiago Borasino7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Compare the impact of initial extubation to positive airway pressure versus high-flow nasal cannula on postoperative outcomes in neonates and infants after congenital heart surgery.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity-matched analysis.
SETTING: Cardiac ICU within a tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: Patients less than 6 months old initially extubated to either high-flow nasal cannula or positive airway pressure after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included (July 2012 to December 2015).
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 258 encounters, propensity matching identified 49 pairings of patients extubated to high-flow nasal cannula versus positive airway pressure. Extubation failure was 12% for all screened encounters. After matching, there was no difference in extubation failure rate between groups (positive airway pressure 16% vs high-flow nasal cannula 10%; p = 0.549). However, compared with high-flow nasal cannula, patients initially extubated to positive airway pressure experienced greater resource utilization: longer time to low-flow nasal cannula (83 vs 28 hr; p = 0.006); longer time to room air (159 vs 110 hr; p = 0.013); and longer postsurgical hospital length of stay (22 vs 14 d; p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: In this pediatric cohort, primary extubation to positive airway pressure was not superior to high-flow nasal cannula with respect to prevention of extubation failure after congenital heart surgery. Compared with high-flow nasal cannula, use of positive airway pressure was associated with increased hospital resource utilization. Prospective initiatives aimed at establishing best clinical practice for postoperative noninvasive respiratory support are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30407954     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  3 in total

1.  Predicting nasal high-flow therapy failure by pediatric respiratory rate-oxygenation index and pediatric respiratory rate-oxygenation index variation in children.

Authors:  Dincer Yildizdas; Ahmet Yontem; Gokce Iplik; Ozden Ozgur Horoz; Faruk Ekinci
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Adjuvant lidocaine to a propofol-ketamine-based sedation regimen for bone marrow aspirates and biopsy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Yu; Ryan Louer; Riad Lutfi; Samer Abu-Sultaneh; Mouhammad Yabrodi; Janine Zee-Cheng; Kamal Abulebda
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Comparison of high flow oxygen therapy versus noninvasive mechanical ventilation for successful weaning from invasive ventilation in children: An observational study.

Authors:  Nur Berna Celik; Murat Tanyildiz; Filiz Yetimakman; Selman Kesici; Benan Bayrakci
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.